Hi all,
A while back I added unix domain socket support to tomcat-native, and patched
tomcat to use it until java16 is available.
Unfortunately unix domain socket support was removed from tomcat-native 2.0+,
and now tomcat-native 2.0+ is appearing in distros, meaning that unix domain
socket
On 18 Aug 2022, at 06:57, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> Have you considered migrating from Bugzilla to GitHub Issues?
>
> I think co-locating issues, code, and PRs at GitHub would make it easier to
> browse both issues and code.
-1.
GitHub as a service is hosted by someone else, who are in no
On 01 Feb 2021, at 22:11, Michael Osipov wrote:
>> If I’m reading this correctly this breaks Windows - the permissions on the
>> UDS socket will be the same as those of the Tomcat process, which is “I can
>> talk to me, but everyone else is read only, so unless you’re me I refuse to
>> serve
On 01 Feb 2021, at 11:51, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> +if (family == Socket.APR_UNIX) {
>> +if (getUnixDomainSocketPathPermissions() != null) {
>> +FileAttribute> attrs =
>> +
>>
On 01 Feb 2021, at 14:12, micha...@apache.org wrote:
>Apply same UDS path perm approach in the AprEndpoint as in the NioEndpoint
> ---
> java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java | 10 +++---
> java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioEndpoint.java | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 5
On 01 Dec 2020, at 14:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I also object to the removal of OpenSSL code, for the same reason.
>
> It isn't being removed. The APR/Native library will be retained along
> with OpenSSL support for the NIO and NIO2.
>
> I expect the scope of the APR/Native library for Tomcat
On 01 Dec 2020, at 13:48, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> You still have years to plan a migration off the APR connector as it will
> only be removed in 10.1 and Tomcat 9.0 continues to be supported.
>
> This eventual removal or APR has been discussed for years. BTW, so that you
> know, there are also
Hi all,
I object to the deprecation of the tomcat-native/APR connector.
Most specifically, I am -1 on the following:
https://marc.info/?l=tomcat-dev=160681846808019=2
Looking at past discussion on this, the justification has been:
"It is inherently less stable. If we get the NIO code wrong,
