On 03/08/2010 08:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I propose to relax our RTC policy and use CTR for the types of changes
listed below:
Usually a vote has a single voting item, but all those
things you've put to vote are something many projects
already have as a policy.
Allow C-T-R for cha
Your vote proposal is not very much readable.
Please make a standard single request for vote and
check boxes +1, -1 (+0, -0 are irrelevant thought, but might be added as well)
On 03/08/2010 06:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
1. We already have Commit-Then-Review for any documentation, includ
On 03/08/2010 08:57 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
Thanks
I'm trying to track down a VC6 install so I can test the .dsp build before I
commit.
Maybe a move to VC2003 as a minimum might be in order some day.
We just need MSVCRT, and the functions you've added are
Microsoft vision of POSIX function
On 03/08/2010 09:08 AM, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: timw
Date: Mon Mar 8 08:08:46 2010
New Revision: 920225
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920225&view=rev
Log:
Fixing VC6 build by replacing uses of strcpy_s with StringCbCopy.
There are bunch of other functions with _s suffix you've
On 03/07/2010 09:31 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: timw
+/* Remember the current log file name for the next potential
rotate */
+strcpy_s(log_file_effective, sizeof(log_file_effective),
log_file_name);
-1
You will have to use StringCb routines here, because strcpy
On 03/07/2010 09:17 PM, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: timw
--- tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.rc (added)
+++ tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-2.0/mod_jk.rc Sun Mar 7 20:17:04 2010
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// Microsoft Visual C++ generated resource script.
+//
Nice but this should be hand craf
On 03/04/2010 12:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 02.03.2010 10:14, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 09:14:44 2010
New Revision: 917928
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917928&view=rev
Log:
Port SSLInsecureRenegotiation from mod_ssl
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/
On 03/03/2010 01:19 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/02/2010 05:58 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/02/2010 05:47 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
New Revision
On 03/02/2010 05:58 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/02/2010 05:47 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
New Revision: 917921
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc
On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
And few ones that need votes :)
E.g the trivial exception throwing fix for APR connector on shutdown.
Regards
--
^TM
--
On 03/02/2010 05:58 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
How does that interacts with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881179&view=rev ?
The same way as in mod_ssl
Yes but won't it be possible to allow client initiated renegotiation
with 0.9.8m?
According to the OpenSSL docs:
If the option SSL
On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
New Revision: 917921
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917921&view=rev
Log:
Add unafe legacy renegotiation support
How does that interacts with
h
On 03/02/2010 01:17 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 09:19 +, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 2 09:19:45 2010
New Revision: 917931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917931&view=rev
Log:
With unsafe reneg, minimum required is 1.2.21 caused by API chang
Hi,
I backported mod_ssl's SSLInsecureRenegotiation option
and would like to T&R 1.2.21 with compiled OpenSSL 0.9.8m
that should fully solve the CVE-2009-3555.
ABI is extended to allow checking the OpenSSL feature
supported, so usage would require 1.2.21.
Comments?
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 02/24/2010 11:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
If the release is postponed I'd like to add the
legacy renegotiation support from trunk.
It requires tomcat-native 1.2.21 release first
with compil
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 stable.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 concentrates mainly on bug fixes.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
D
On 02/28/2010 11:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
One addition: the combination of the a+c mode and fflush() shows the
problem. As soon as I remove one of the two, perforemance is fine.
What 'c' flag does is to actually call _commit (FlushFileBuffers)
on fflush(). Without that the fflush is called w
On 02/27/2010 01:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
We have collected required three binding votes
so I'll proceed and remove 1.2.29 from dist and arch,
update the site and make a notice of that with
1.2.30 announcement
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 02/27/2010 12:14 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
With my vote
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
we have collected required three binding votes
so I'll proceed with copying to dist and
making announcement.
Regards
-
On 02/28/2010 11:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.02.2010 12:14, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.30 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
On 02/27/2010 04:16 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.02.2010 15:54, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also
On 02/27/2010 03:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I just made an notice on tomcat index.html
Should be enough thought.
I'll also add the same notice to README.html files
inside binaries/
Shouldn't we also remove the 29 files form dist and archive?
Once when the vote is done.
I'd rather see it repl
On 02/27/2010 02:28 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27 Mladen Turk:
+1
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It does. Same as for release.
It's been only a day since announced, so as soon
we remove it and release 1.2.30 with fix we'll
make less users angry.
Announcem
+1
On 02/27/2010 01:02 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/27:
Author: mturk
Date: Sat Feb 27 10:16:14 2010
New Revision: 916938
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916938&view=rev
Log:
Revert withdrawal notice. Seems this requires a vote
If withdrawing needs a vote, here is my +1.
It
Hi,
We have one serious bug with 1.2.29 that causes IIS to
crash on POST request.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48826
Other web connectors are not affected by that bug
Please test the provided release so we can replace the
existing 1.2.29 ASAP.
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/
Hi,
We have a bug with IIS/1.2.29 which makes it unusable and it
crashes the IIS.
I'll tag the 1.2.30 and make immediate vote/release because
it's a serious regression.
I suppose we would need to withdraw 1.2.29 as well
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 02/26/2010 06:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/10/2010 4:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is:
[ ] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what
Hi,
I added README.html directory listing footer
as well as .htaccess with extensions description.
So, when doing release, update the README.html with
the current stable version number.
It is shown on
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-6/
(If not hit F-5)
Regards
--
^TM
---
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 stable.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 concentrates mainly on bug fixes.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc-1.2.29/miscellaneous/changelog.
On 02/26/2010 07:56 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
The above line: I think you meant
s/mainly/many/
I meant mainly
s/over ... 1.2.29/over ... 1.2.28/
Now, that WAS a typo :)
Cheers
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-un
On 02/23/2010 04:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 is:
With my vote ...
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
We have gathered
Hi,
Just released the Daemon 1.0.2.
Since now we've been using custom Daemon
spins basically tagging the trunk and
maintaining our set of binaries.
Released version has everything but some things
like jsvc.tar.gz aren't there any more.
Don't panic cause it is now inside
commons-daemon-1.0.2-nat
On 02/24/2010 11:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Checked on windows and linux.
You might wish to add the note about known issue
Windows exception thrown on shutdown
SEVERE: Socket accept failed.
T
On 02/23/2010 05:35 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Hi,
I think the new version string JK_VERSTRING should be 1.2.30 not 1.2.10.
Right, it was typo.
Thanks
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For a
Hi,
Tomcat Connectors 1.2.29 version is available for testing:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/
Sources can be found at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/jk-1.2.29/
(Note that the tomcat-connectors-1.2.29-dev-912307-src.* files will
be visible
On 02/23/2010 08:41 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Should we mention in the changelog, that it needs improvement?
Sure. Go ahead and add a notice.
changelog might not be the proper place, but it
seems we don't have anything more appropriate.
Thanks for those last minute updates!
Cheers
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.29 tomorrow around 12:00 GMT
and later propose a vote.
We had few release snapshots that had no
show-stoppers reported beside one bug and
one regression that are already solved.
In case someone has a serious reason why I
shouldn't do that, please speak.
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 02/19/2010 05:06 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Not a mod_proxy guru, but filtering X-header from responses should be near
trivial based on past experience with the proxy code.
There is the GPL licence 'problem' of the Hyperic lib which should be
'solved' isn't ?
Tomcat Native already has some c
On 02/17/2010 04:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
thanks for rolling. Did you see BZ 48742, which seems to be a
show-stopper regression.
Updated a new snapshot (911726) with BZ48742 fixed.
I plan to stick with the schedule and tag on Tuesday.
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supporting
SPDY
I have nothing against SPDY and it really looks cool,
but IMHO it's doesn't look and feel like the r
On 02/17/2010 04:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
thanks for rolling. Did you see BZ 48742, which seems to be a
show-stopper regression.
Nope, didn't see that, and it looks like a regression.
I'll fix that and make another test run on Friday.
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 02/11/2010 12:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Test snapshot for 1.2.29 is available at
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/
So far no comments, so I suppose everything works like a charm.
Since we have postponed this release mostly because core
developers are busy bees for a
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.20 stable.
This release includes a fix for JVM crash on Tomcat shutdown.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
htt
On 02/16/2010 06:57 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
I think the main driver for replacing ajp is the 2-directional protocols -
and if we
replace it, why invent a new protocol and not just adopt SPDY, which has all
we need.
Totally agree.
Both JK and AJP originate from days when the single server
We have collected 4 binding votes, so I'll proceed
with the release.
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Regards
--
^TM
On 02/17/2010 05:12 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/10 Mladen Turk:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.20 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
Tested win32 binaries only.
Minor: *.md5 and *.sha1 files should have " *" between checksum and
filename, because those files
On 02/16/2010 10:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/02/2010 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The other thing it potentially allows is the cluster to tell the proxy
about which nodes are in the cluster, allowing a more dynamic
configuration. Not sure I'd wa
On 02/16/2010 09:56 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I don't see why the current set of valid cluster nodes could not be
passed back via a header.
Exactly.
That raises the interesting question of if a node goes down, which
component will notice first? The proxy or the cluster? With long
timeouts in t
On 02/16/2010 12:24 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/02/2010 21:52, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
why not just a servlet filter?
+1. I was going to suggest the same thing.
Why not reusing the clustering code for that.
It would allow to pre-redirect the requests
without doing the actual ping
On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
Ping. Anyone?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hi,
Test snapshot for 1.2.29 is available at
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/jk/
Sources can be found inside source/jk-1.2.29 directories
while the windows binaries are inside:
binaries/win32/jk-1.2.29 and
binaries/win64/jk-1.2.29
documentation is inside
docs/jk-1.2.29
Pleas
On 02/08/2010 08:32 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
After a couple of heavily loaded weeks, I'll have time to care about it
this week. I'll review the changes done by Mladen and will then proceed
with the usual snapshot for letting people do some tests before the
final release. I guess I'll need 2 or 3 da
On 02/08/2010 08:32 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
After a couple of heavily loaded weeks, I'll have time to care about it
this week. I'll review the changes done by Mladen and will then proceed
with the usual snapshot for letting people do some tests before the
final release. I guess I'll need 2 or 3 da
Hi,
Native 1.1.20 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.19 and earlier versions it has a bug fix that
prevents crashing JVM on shutdown.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/1.1.2
On 02/08/2010 08:38 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
There's a USE_RAW_HEADERS define that will force the use of the raw HTTP
headers and avoid this problem, so I'd propose that we make that behaviour
the default.
I agree with having it default, but is it possible to have additional
configure option
Hi,
We have a nasty bug that crashes the JVM on shutdown cause
by Library.terminate call while we are inside Socket.accept
The reason for crash is that we reference later in code the
memory that was already destroyed with apr_pool_terminate, and
can lead to a JVM core.
The fix is quite simple (
On 02/03/2010 07:07 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
and all the .exe files are gone, from the .zip file, this is a pain in
the ass, no windows without installer?
why the change from .20 to .24? should just be a build update?
Like Mark said, they are in the separate .zip files.
This is IMHO
On 01/21/2010 10:33 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
To: Tomcat Users List,
Tomcat Developers List,
annou...@apache.org
There is also annou...@tomcat.apache.org mailing list,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-announce/
Done.
Regards
--
^TM
-
I just realized this never went trough announce, sorry folks.
Anyhow, better late then newer :)
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.19 stable. This release include few minor fixes
over Tomcat Native 1.1.18.
Cheers
--
^TM
---
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.19 stable. This release include few minor fixes
over Tomcat Native 1.1.18.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
h
On 01/19/2010 03:25 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Cheers
--
^TM
-
On 01/15/2010 05:21 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Also the tar produced by ant doesn't look at all
like the one produced by gtar.
Think the problem is that we should add all files
at once during the build since it looks the tar has
multiple header sections or something.
I never had problems extracti
On 01/15/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/01/2010 15:13, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update.
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
I'd prefer keep the package-zip with CRLF (and ensure CRLF in
package-deployer-zip too).
Just to update.
Since beginning of time httpd has x.x-win32-src.zip
We could have something like that as well instea
On 01/15/2010 03:41 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.01.2010 21:21, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan 14 20:21:23 2010
New Revision: 899395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899395&view=rev
Log:
zip is for non-windows platforms
Hmmm, really?
Until recently we didn't have th
On 01/15/2010 08:22 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
We have to fix the TCK failures, We shouldn't release some things which
is not TCK compliant.
+1
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
On 01/13/2010 10:09 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.23 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Third luck ;)
Please complain if that is not ok.
+1
Cheers
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
On 01/11/2010 08:47 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Tim
Whittington has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Please join me in welcoming him.
Welcome Tim!
Really glad you've been elected as a committer.
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 01/05/2010 03:50 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
OK. We have 4 binding +1 votes.
I&#x
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
I know it's a pickle season, and you guys
are all busy digesting Christmas and New Year eve's
meals, but can I have some votes here :)
The difference between released 1.1.18 is trivial,
like explained in the proposal, so you'll be voting
on package rather then
On 01/07/2010 10:49 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
That looks better - will incorporate that.
Not sure why are you using ftell_nolock
We already have a problem with ISS logging because
multiple processes (IIS 6+) can write to a single log file.
On the configuration I went for two properties wit
On 01/07/2010 09:56 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
I've attached the initial implementation, along with a docs patch, to an issue
in Bugzilla.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48501
I managed to track down the crashing - I was referencing a jk_file_logger_t
that got deallocated w
On 01/06/2010 03:28 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
The downside of the rotatelogs approach is that it's not easy to do log pruning
(since the filenames are based on the time the log rotates, rather than some
kind of backup suffix scheme), so I may do nothing about that for now - the
best I could
+1
I've done majority of planned fixes.
Let's tag and then play with IIS rotatelogs.
BTW, the IIS logging should be fixed now
(compiling with commode.obj that forces a real flush on fflush)
On 01/06/2010 11:07 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Any objections to the following plan about JK 1.2.29?
- 15.
On 01/06/2010 01:21 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/1/5 Mladen Turk:
Hi,
Native 1.1.19 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building against
OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me before the tag :)
If you want to take a look, the final source
Hi,
Native 1.1.19 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building against
OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me before the tag :)
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-
On 01/05/2010 01:34 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the
tcnative repos.
Done. After second thought the perl is more likely to be present
then unix2dos.
Regards
--
^TM
On 01/05/2010 01:34 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I seem to remember that the fix line ends perl script is part of the
tcnative repos.
Which requires perl, so chicken and egg problem again.
Probably could be used if the unix2dos is not found
and perl exists.
Regards
--
^TM
On 01/05/2010 11:57 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Get rid of nested version test by formatting
version number as one big decimal.
+ decimal_apr_version=`printf %02d%02d%03d ${1} ${2} ${3}`
+ if test "${decimal_apr_version}" -lt "0101003"; then
You should not quote the arithmetic
On 01/05/2010 11:23 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/1/5 Rainer Jung:
Konstantin: JFC is right, it was meant to also check against the third part
of the minimum apr version "1 . 3 . 3".
By the way: you should check the third number
only if the second one is equal to "3".
The simplest wo
Hi,
I've build the 1.1.19 pre-release
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/
It is build from 1.1.x branch using the
revision 859968
If no one finds any problems with that, I'll
tag the 1.1.19 in few hours and create a full release
with vote proposal.
Regards
--
^TM
On 01/05/2010 10:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 05.01.2010 10:04, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure
and doesn't need to be in repository.
This file is more like a README. It says
On 01/05/2010 09:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I think the file native/srclib/VERSIONS should be created by configure
and doesn't need to be in repository.
This file is more like a README. It says which version is
recommended/required for the builds.
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 01/04/2010 03:59 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Should we update the recommended version in AprLifecycleListener to 19?
At the moment we have recommended=17 and required=17.
This should be recommended=18 and required=17
since the .18 contains the SSL MITM fixes.
Required should stay at 17 cause it
On 01/04/2010 04:21 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
The compiled "tcnative-.dll" DLLs on
http://www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.18/binaries/win(32|64)
all show "1.1.18.0" on the Version tab in the File Properties dialog
in Windows Explorer.
The same with the ones in 6.0.2
On 01/04/2010 02:10 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
It's not the case in the OS/X version
Nope. the windows .rc file wasn't updated
before 1.1.18 tag, so when you compile a .dll
and check it's resource version, it reports 1.1.16
This can be a problem with some third party install
tools that depend on
Hi,
Version 1.1.18 wasn't properly tagged, so it
carries the 1.1.16 version in the windows binary builds
(only when you check the .dll version itself)
It's a minor issue already fixed in the SVN, so
before releasing new Tomcat I'd like we have the
native release clean.
I'll make a tag and fixed
On 12/23/2009 11:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
So I suggest we try that for TC 7 and find out how to do that in a good
way (or not) before we try with 6.0. Let's stick to the existing process
for 6.0 and do the experiments with 7.
We can easily make a script similar to the one we have for mod_jk
On 12/23/2009 08:50 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/21:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Dec 21 12:39:29 2009
New Revision: 892800
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892800&view=rev
Log:
Fix #48305. Skip if property ends with .secret
Modified:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/common/jk_status.c
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
release candidates (marking the files with rcX or dev or whatever) the
only safe thing would be to burn version number 6.0.21 and go for 6.0.22.
+1
Let's make a proper release.
I'd suggest to make a release on a specific SVN revision instead tag.
Th
On 12/22/2009 08:28 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.12.2009 20:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
I have a tendency to not put to much new stuff in 29 because it would be
nice to have a stable release with only bug fixes. Adding stuff to the
watchdog might be nice for a not to far 30 release?
Of course
On 12/22/2009 07:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.12.2009 19:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Something missing and hard to guess. The total number of currently
opened connection per worker
Cool!
Even more cool option would be the mechanism to
close all those connection from status.
Possible only
On 12/22/2009 07:18 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 22.12.2009 19:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Something missing and hard to guess. The total number of currently
opened connection per worker
Cool!
Right, It's actually amazing
ab -c 10 -n 1000 ...
with event mpm opens 24+ connections
Regards
--
^
On 12/22/2009 10:11 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
Meaning:
1. Wrong tcnative
2. Bui
On 12/22/2009 08:15 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[X] Broken
[ ] Alpha
On 12/21/2009 11:39 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[X] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
tcnative-1.dll in the zips is build with dynamically
On 12/21/2009 07:54 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.12.2009 13:55, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Fix #48276. Just like with setting port to 0, if the resolve fails,
mark the worker as disabled
If we want to support pre allocation of workers with names not yet
reolvable I'm fine with a global setting t
On 12/17/2009 05:23 PM, Semyon wrote:
Hello, all
I'm building native library for:
Tomcat 6.0.20
JNI 1.1.18
APR 1.4.1
OS: Solaris 5.10
compiler: gcc -m64
Library was built ok. When I begin starting tomcat I have such logs:
Does anybody know about such problem?
Probably because you are usin
On 12/15/2009 05:13 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Some votes... those with>=3 I will commit today or so
Shouldn't that be a responsibility of the proposer?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
On 12/15/2009 02:12 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Why is that better?
Uses significant bits out of pthread pointer.
I'm concerned, that it breaks thread id's as logged
by other components. For instance on Solaris I think the thread id
logged by mod_jk is the same as by httpd when using %{tid}P in t
501 - 600 of 1263 matches
Mail list logo
