https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Are you sure about the request parameters being parsed multiple times? They
should only be parsed once per request.
Is org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.StringCache not caching the Strings or is just
that local
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz ---
How do you get a valid HTTP request (not a 400) but then find yourself in a
"Bad Request" state once async gets started?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #6 from adwsingh ---
I agree on the closing connection part. Its just weird that sync and async
behave differently, one sends out a 400 and other doesn't.
Also the way you suggested in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
I haven't looked at this yet but I suspect it may end up as WONTFIX.
A bad request indicates a syntactically invalid request. At that point, it can
be argued that given that the request is invalid, Tomcat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #4 from adwsingh ---
Any update on this? I can give fixing this a shot if no one else is planning
to.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Bug ID: 68572
Summary: migration tool does not conver xmlrpc-server3.0.jar to
be jakarta compliant
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.18
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
adwsingh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
adwsingh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adwsi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #1 from adwsingh ---
Also similar to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68228
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Bug ID: 68559
Summary: BadRequestException doesn't send back a 400 when using
Async servlets
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.85
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Bug ID: 68558
Summary: Redundant calls to ByteChunk.toString()
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.81
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Bug ID: 68555
Summary: Errors encountered after upgrading version 7.0.57 to
9.0.14
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.14
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Den changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #2 from Den ---
Mark, I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
Ok, this sounds reasonable looking at the code.
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/main/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java#L623
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
--- Comment #1 from John Engebretson ---
Sorry, error with the numbering in the last sentence: the attached speed test
shows a big improvement with #1 (right-sizing) but a greater improvement from
either #2 or #3.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Bug ID: 68546
Summary: Performance optimization in
PageContextImpl.getELContext()
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.81
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
No response after a week.
If the requested information is not provided, the issue will be closed as
WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Bug ID: 68533
Summary: Failed to load resource: net::ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
--- Comment #1 from kyuubimodero...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 39537
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39537=edit
Logs when debug is enabled
Attached commons-daemon.log file after enabling debug mode (--LogLe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Bug ID: 68518
Summary: Tomcat Windows Service fails when running in OpenJDK
11
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
SSLContext.getInstance("TLS") is the correct way.
Please go to the users mailing list to investigate.
https://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
Bug ID: 68500
Summary: occur a security vulnerable SSL connection(TLS1.1)
when send a packet for heartbeat in k8s tribes
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.52
Hardware
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #4 from Manak Bisht ---
Somehow, embarrassingly, I missed both those obvious details. Thanks for the
correcting me. I will be more mindful in the future.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Those are debug messages, not error messages and are expected when running on
Java 21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Manak Bisht changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Manak Bisht
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Bug ID: 68495
Summary: Unable to find match between the canonical context and
the URI presented by the user agent
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.85
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Bug ID: 68493
Summary: NoSuchMethodException:
java.lang.foreign.MemorySegment.getString(long) is
thrown during the application start using java 21
Product: Tomcat 11
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
There are only 5 cipher suites defied in TLSv1.3. Is this really that much of
an optimization?
I suppose it's a bit of a documentation improvement for configuration...
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Hui Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lidot...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Bug ID: 68480
Summary: Add cipher alias for TLSv1.3
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68474
Bug ID: 68474
Summary: Expertize
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.0.0-RC1
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #19 from Matt M ---
This is looking like a case where the remote endpoint is not able to respond
with its own close message.
We have seen 2 types of exception recorded in the Nio2SocketWrapper present in
the heap
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
channa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
--- Comment #18 from Matt M ---
After a recent upgrade from 9.0.63 to 9.0.75 (with the 2 websocket fixes from
9.0.77 patched in) I am seeing some occurrences of the WsSession Object stuck
on the heap with state OUTPUT_CLOSED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
--- Comment #3 from Rajkamal Pillai ---
Correction: session.setMaxInactiveInterval ( 1800 );
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
--- Comment #2 from Rajkamal Pillai ---
Steps to replicate:
1. Set
[code]
10
...
[/code]
2. Start Tomcat (I am on Tomcat 9.0.83).
3. From Java Action execute -
[code]
public void execute (HttpServletRequest request
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Jhone changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Jhone ---
It seems
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
--- Comment #7 from Mircea Butmalai ---
Dear Channa,
I have just tested with tomcat 10.1.16 that contains the fix and after passing
form authentication the session timeout reverts to default 30 minutes as
calculated from application web.xml
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67793
channa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Bug ID: 68449
Summary: session.maxInactiveInterval() is not working for SSO
Users.
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> My intention is to add this feature but with a note in the Javadoc and the
> configuration docs that it is not final and there may be breaking c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz ---
Seems easy enough to (a) change this into a DEBUG log and (b) change the
language to be more clear. It's not that the driver isn't being loaded... it's
that the pool isn't *explicitly* triggering
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #31 from Valentin Tyanov ---
Hey, is there a scheduled date for the January release?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 10 |Tomcat Modules
Component
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
I'd be a lot happier adding this if this work was included in the current
RFC6265bis work rather than having been deferred until after RFC6265. My
concern is primarily that the current approach may change
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
Bug ID: 68436
Summary: Hide "Not loading a JDBC driver as driverClassName
property is null" warning
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Har
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68378
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C source code is compatible |C source code
401 - 500 of 47005 matches
Mail list logo
