[Bug 53498] Atomicity violation bugs because of misusing concurrent collections

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 --- Comment #4 from mikebel...@yahoo.com --- probably a nit pick but the declarations really should be for ConcurrentMap not ConcurrentHashMap. There are variants of Concurrenthashmap coming in java8, and it's more correct to declare

[Bug 53498] Atomicity violation bugs because of misusing concurrent collections

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 --- Comment #3 from Yu Lin yu.lin...@gmail.com --- Hello, (In reply to comment #2) Many thanks for the analysis and patch. = You are welcome. Regardless, these three are fixed in trunk and 7.0.x and will be included in 7.0.30

[Bug 53498] Atomicity violation bugs because of misusing concurrent collections

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 53498] Atomicity violation bugs because of misusing concurrent collections

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29021|0 |1 is