https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #12 from fach hoch fachh...@gmail.com ---
is this fix available in tomcat 7.0.50? I am getting this error in jdk1.7 64
bit tomcat 7.0.50
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #13 from Chuck Caldarale chuck.caldar...@unisys.com ---
(In reply to fach hoch from comment #12)
is this fix available in tomcat 7.0.50?
No, it's in 7.0.55, as stated in comment #10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
The workaround and simple debug code was pretty simple so I have backported it
to 7.0.x (it will be in 7.0.55 onwards) and proposed if for 6.0.x.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com ---
Javadoc for ServerSocket.accept() says that SocketTimeoutException can be
thrown by the method if a timeout was previously set with setSoTimeout. [1]
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #6)
BTW,
Javadoc for ServerSocket.setSoTimeout() says that to set an infinite timeout
one uses the value of 0. Is somebody confusing '0'
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org ---
Workaround added to 8.0.x for 8.0.10 onwards. If the timout occurs a warning is
logged that reports how long accept was blocking for before the timeout.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
Gustavo Lopes gust...@thehyve.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #3 from Gustavo Lopes gust...@thehyve.nl ---
The strace output may actually be a bug in strace because poll() takes a signed
int as timeout; it would seem strace is interpreting the value as an unsigned
int. Indeed:
$ cat a.c
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56684
--- Comment #4 from Gustavo Lopes gust...@thehyve.nl ---
A quick observation: the poll syscall used to take a long, and now takes an
int. Maybe strace hasn't been updated yet:
http://lwn.net/Articles/483078/
--
You are receiving this
12 matches
Mail list logo
