https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
See https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/125
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
My suggestion is as follows:
Add a new getter for every getPort() or equivalent named getPortWithOffset()
and use it in place of getPort() whenever code needs to get the actual port
number
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #5 from Pradip Bhattacharya ---
port offset is a good thing to have, can help a lot in having multiple
installations/resolving port conflicts.
I have tried to implement it by adding portOffset
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #4 from Igal Sapir ---
Can we discuss the guidelines/specification for this feature? Anyone wants to
contribute their thoughts?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #3 from Igal Sapir ---
(moving discussion from Github to the ticket):
>I think more discussion is required on how to approach this. Specifically,
>when should the offset be applied?
I agree, and I was
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #2 from Igal Sapir ---
Comments from Mark Thomas on Github
(https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/63#issuecomment-307556995):
I think more discussion is required on how to approach this. Specifically, when
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171
--- Comment #1 from Igal Sapir ---
Please see https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/63
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.