https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
Another idea.
Add a new option cgiMethods which is a comma separated list of methods to pass
to the CGI script (or * for all methods). Requests using one of those methods
are always passed to the script.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #7)
> My current thinking is to add a single new option, enableAllHttpMethods. If
> this is enabled, every request regardless of method
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
I've been thinking about this some more and experimenting with different ideas.
Trying to reconcile the combination of maximising backwards compatibility,
supporting any HTTP method and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
Good point. Fixing that starts heading in the direction of the original patch
again. More thought required.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #5 from jm009 ---
> Unless there are objections then I propose the following:
> - allow any HTTP method and let the CGI script decide how to handle it
Sounds good.
> - except HEAD, TRACE and OPTIONS which
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
Currently, the CGI servlet only handles a request body if the method is POST
and the Content-Length header is set.
Unless there are objections then I propose the following:
- allow any
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #3 from jm009 ---
(In reply to jm009 from comment #2)
> How to determine in this case, if request body data (a.k.a. "POST data")
> should be forwarded to the servlet?
If I get it right, this reverse proxy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #2 from jm009 ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> I don't like this patch (-1) for a number of reasons.
>
> 1. It uses many regular expressions during each request: poor performance
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61692
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
I don't like this patch (-1) for a number of reasons.
1. It uses many regular expressions during each request: poor performance
2. It requires configuration for what
10 matches
Mail list logo