https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #12 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
Please close this issue. We cannot provide a valid test case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #11 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
Bear with us for a moment as we are trying to get a viable test case together.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #10 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
Thanks for your reply. I will post an update to this issue tomorrow.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to william.crowell from comment #8)
> > Are you also able to reliably reproduce the error without RECYCLE_FACADES
> > enabled?
>
> Yes, it happens on each test run.
Great.
> > Tomcat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #8 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
> Are you also able to reliably reproduce the error without RECYCLE_FACADES
> enabled?
Yes, it happens on each test run.
> Tomcat (usually) properly protects these objects from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to william.crowell from comment #4)
> Setting org.apache.catalina.connector.RECYCLE_FACADES to true did work.
Excellent. Since it "works", are you also able to reliably reproduce the error
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #6 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
For a simple test case are you looking for application code?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat ---
I described the scenario in my comment, the application code is most likely not
aware that the async is done. To know where the problem comes from a simple
test case would be useful.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #4 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
Setting org.apache.catalina.connector.RECYCLE_FACADES to true did work. Do you
know why that fixed the issue? I am also concerned about the performance
impact of setting that flag to true.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
You are presenting what could be an issue in a complex and confusing IMO. So
let's start over.
The changes to isClosed is likely not relevant and this will not be changed.
They ensure that the socket
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64082
--- Comment #1 from william.crow...@roguewave.com ---
For reference:
Tomcat 8.5.3 - 8.5.31 and 9.0.0 - 9.0.8:
...
@Override
public boolean isClosed()
{ return !getSocket().isOpen(); }
...
Tomcat 8.5.32 - 8.5.37 and 9.0.9 - 9.0.14
...
13 matches
Mail list logo