https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #15 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
If you can, please delete today's comments here (except for the first one) to
avoid confusion for others.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Marvin Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #13 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
Sure. This one is for the variant with only
"${catalina.base}/foo/bar/myentity.xml"
java.net.MalformedURLException: no protocol:
${catalina.base}/foo/bar/myentity.xml
at java.base/java.net.URL.(
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas ---
I'll take a look. Meanwhile, can you provide the full stack trace please.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #11 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
I also tried
which led to:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: ${catalina.base}/foo/bar/myentity.xml (Datei
oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Marvin Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #9 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
Wow, that was quick. Unfortunately I missed the notification. Sorry for that.
This solution is perfect. Thanks a lot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Glad we are thinking in the same direction.
The EntityResolver isn't currently configurable. I'll consider that option as
well but adding support for ${...} looks like the simplest solution at the
moment.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #6 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
Yes, I was about to suggest that. I was thinking about using ${CATALINA_BASE}
as part of the import path.
So, yes, that would help a lot.
Is it possible by the way to specify a custom entity resolver, w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Would it help if Tomcat added ${...} property replacement support so you could
do something like:
##
]>
##
And then you could add
property.containing.correct.path=/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
Steve Sanders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevesander...@gmail.com
--
You are r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
Dealing with this first. The behaviour on Linux and Windows is the same. There
is no platform specific code in Tomcat's resource handling. Junctions !=
symbolic links and the JRE treats them differently.
Unf
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #3 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
How about the difference between Linux and Windows? Shouldn't this fail on
Windows, too, if it does on Linux? Or vice versa, work on both?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #2 from Marvin Fröhlich ---
Hi Mark,
thanks a lot for taking a look at this.
What a pity, that this is considered correct behavior. Couldn't this be
configurable like allowLinking? I mean, it may be correct for many, but not for
a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64089
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm afraid I am going to take a different view.
The behaviour you were relying on was a bug and, now that bug has been fixed,
the behaviour has changed.
For reference the change was as a result of this thre
16 matches
Mail list logo
