https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
--- Comment #4 from Conny Seifert ---
Created attachment 38551
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38551=edit
minimal testcase
attached app returns string "test" without any headers.
In case of failure output looks like
Dear team,
Server might sends message headers for the request done by client
Here the response might be empty atheist I considered it a servlet
Regards
Koti
On Wed, 3 May 2023, 14:43 , wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
>
> --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
--- Comment #3 from Conny Seifert ---
If I understood the code correctly, the "header-loop" beginning in line 950 is
not entered at all in case of 0 headers. So no https status code is appended to
AJP response and also the number of headers is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66591
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks for the report.
My reading of RFC 9110 (section 3.4) is that responses do not require headers.
I am a little curious how the fix for bug 66512 triggered this but it does look
like a bug.
I'm working