https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #6 from Matt M ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #5)
> I'm ignorant of the threading details of Websocket, so maybe this is a
> stupid question: Could a single thread be used to perform these kinds of
> cleanups,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
I'm ignorant of the threading details of Websocket, so maybe this is a stupid
question: Could a single thread be used to perform these kinds of cleanups,
instead of an army of threads? That would let
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #4 from Matt M ---
Thank you for the feedback and completely agree that there are other factors
involved in creating the conditions for this issue to occur.
The intent behind the proposal is to make those scenarios more
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Matt M changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39658|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
Patches should be in diff -u form.
The Tomcat team avoids using system properties for configuration unless
absolutely necessary (it isn't necessary here).
Given that this requires a network interruption or
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39658|1 |0
is patch|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Oded Brilon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oded.bri...@servicenow.com
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Matt M changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||inconceiva...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from
