Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

2018-10-03 Thread Mitch Claborn
My only thought was the single-source value. If it would be a lot of extra work to do the text file, then I think the original design is fine. Mitch On 10/02/2018 09:56 AM, Marek Czernek wrote: Well, I personally would prefer if it was  a soure-able (or call-able for windows) script;

Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

2018-10-02 Thread Marek Czernek
Well, I personally would prefer if it was  a soure-able (or call-able for windows) script; otherwise, you'd have to parse the text file to check which part of the text you want to output, since you don't want to output all the text at once, but only for one particular verb. Any particular

Re: Bug 62140 implementation question

2018-10-02 Thread Mitch Claborn
Are the available verbs the same for both .sh and .bat? If so, perhaps a text file that contains the actual help text that could be output from both .bat and .sh. Mitch On 10/01/2018 02:48 PM, Marek Czernek wrote: Hi there, I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some

Bug 62140 implementation question

2018-10-01 Thread Marek Czernek
Hi there, I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some opinions about the implementation details. In my mind, the following solution is quite reasonable: 1. Create new help scripts, such as help.sh and help.bat. These files contain a method for each functional verb that