DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106 Summary: "deferred" expression fails if <jsp-version> less than 2.0 Product: Tomcat 6 Version: 6.0.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Jasper AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some JSF taglibs such as Ajax4JSF mark the jsp-version tag in the TLD like this: <jsp-version>1.2</jsp-version> Then if a developer says something like action="#{foo}" in an Ajax4JSF tag, he will get this: This causes Ajax4JSF to fail with this error: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(26,4) According to TLD or attribute directive in tag file, attribute action does not accept any expressions org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.jspError(DefaultErrorHandler.java:40) org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.dispatch(ErrorDispatcher.java:406) org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.jspError(ErrorDispatcher.java:147) Jasper tries to check the <jsp-version> in the TLD to see if the version is 2.1 and the attribute is not allowing deferred expressions. However, pre-2.1, "#{" had no meaning and was always allowed. In Validator.java, Jasper has this line: boolean checkDeferred = !tagInfo.getTagLibrary().getRequiredVersion().equals("2.0"); The problem is that while the logic will work if the TLD says <jsp-version>2.0</jsp-version>, it won't work for any jsp-version below that. A better way would be to say something like: float taglibRequiredVersion = Float.parseFloat(tagInfo.getTagLibrary().getRequiredVersion()); boolean checkDeferred = taglibRequiredVersion > 2.0f; I tried this and it works. However, this is not a complete fix because it doesn't catch NumberFormatException. Also, some refactoring might be in order because this same logic is found elsewhere in Validator.java and also in TagFileDirectiveVisitor. I'm not sure if the logic in those two places is correct or not. I'm attaching a war with a simple tag that demonstrates the problem. Stan -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
