https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #9 from Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org 2011-06-06 07:04:32 UTC ---
Is there an ETA for tomcat 7.0.15?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-05-30 08:55:57 UTC ---
Your test cases are not representative of the typical jar handling within
Tomcat.
As is explained in the code commentary in the patch, Jars in web applications
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #1 from Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org 2011-05-27 14:49:54 UTC ---
I've debugged the problem and found the issue. This is the incriminated commit:
===
While scanning JARs for TLDs and fragments, avoid using JarFile and use
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #2 from Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org 2011-05-27 14:51:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 27076
-- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27076
Test case showing the issue.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27076|application/octet-stream|text/plain
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
Lapo Luchini l...@lapo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@lapo.it
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #3 from Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org 2011-05-27 15:14:18 UTC ---
Other notes:
- the issue is reproducible on all platforms (tested configurations: OpenJDK6
on FreeBSD and Oracle JDK 1.6 on Windows)
- even modifying the test case
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-05-27 15:43:20 UTC ---
The attached test case isn't representative of how Tomcat handles JARs. The
references to the JARs are passed as URLs. The temporary copy that JarFile
creates in
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #5 from Chuck Caldarale chuck.caldar...@unisys.com 2011-05-27
16:06:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
- JarFile has most parts in native code, while JarInputStream is 100% Java
code
Sorry, that's completely untrue. All
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51276
--- Comment #6 from Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org 2011-05-27 16:58:33 UTC ---
I wanted to create the most simple test case to show up the *enormous and
unjustified* performance difference of JarFile vs JarInputStream on local
files. Passing a
11 matches
Mail list logo
