DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

2011-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 --- Comment #3 from Edward Quick edwardqu...@hotmail.com 2011-09-02 10:35:50 UTC --- Hi there, I was testing this out to see if my site was vulnerable and got the following results. I'm not sure looking at the code comments in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

2011-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 --- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-09-02 10:49:16 UTC --- Bugzilla is not a support forum. Please use the users mailing list. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

2011-09-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 --- Comment #5 from Edward Quick edwardqu...@hotmail.com 2011-09-02 13:04:04 UTC --- Sorry about that. Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

2011-08-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51698] ajp CPing/Forward-Request packet forgery, is a design decision? or a security vulnerability?

2011-08-20 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698 --- Comment #1 from zhh zhh200...@gmail.com 2011-08-20 07:55:51 UTC --- Created attachment 27417 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27417 ajp Forward-Request packet forgery second example: ajp Forward-Request packet