https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #10 from pan4o ssku4...@web.de 2012-03-22 12:51:21 UTC ---
if you need a more detailed POM ... i will submit a complete one :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-22 12:54:10 UTC ---
The POM is no use since Tomcat is not built with Maven. What is required is
details of what needs to go into the manifests.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #12 from pan4o ssku4...@web.de 2012-03-22 13:18:20 UTC ---
All dependencies (imports) you need in a project, should be in Import-Package:
All packages you want to expose (make them public), should be in
Export-Package:
In the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #9 from pan4o ssku4...@web.de 2012-03-21 06:18:23 UTC ---
Very important for each bundle are the imports and exports sections in the
MANIFEST file. We do this so:
plugin
groupIdorg.apache.felix/groupId
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2012-03-20 22:36:51 UTC ---
As far as I am aware, there is very little OSGI expertise amongst the Tomcat
devs. What is really required for this enhancement is either:
- a patch that generates
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #6 from Glyn Normington gnorming...@vmware.com 2012-02-17
11:17:56 UTC ---
If OSGi metadata is added, I suggest also adding a basic test to Tomcat's build
to check that the Tomcat bundle resolve. (I created a similar test for
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov akurta...@gmail.com 2012-02-17
11:21:59 UTC ---
In order to avoid cyclic dependencies and yes servlet.jar is used in too many
places so having dependencies to build its osgi metadata will be a big
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #5 from violet...@apache.org 2012-01-12 21:49:43 UTC ---
Hello,
In Eclipse Virgo we add OSGi metadata using Bundlor. The process is pretty
straightforward and we have projects that do that stuff. Unfortunately we do
not add
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
violet...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||violet...@apache.org
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
pan4o ssku4...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssku4...@web.de
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #4 from pan4o ssku4...@web.de 2012-01-05 12:45:51 UTC ---
This is a very important issue for us too, because of our Apache Karaf
environment. See bugs 52318 and 52429
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-12-23 21:27:07 UTC ---
Not knowing much about OSGI, if you could provide suitable manifests that would
be great. Once we have them, plugging them into the build is relatively simple.
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52381
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurta...@gmail.com 2011-12-22
12:40:36 UTC ---
The manifests used aren't good enough for inclusion but I'll try to come with
something better after vacation.
--
Configure bugmail:
14 matches
Mail list logo
