Re: Questions on Jasper's BodyContentImpl, bug #43925, and proposed solution

2014-05-02 Thread Scott Severtson
All, We've developed a patch as proposed below, and have been running it in our production environment (currently Tomcat 6.0.37) for several months. The patch applies cleanly to the Tomcat 6.0.x, 7.0.x, and 8.0.x series, with very minor variation in the exact line numbers. The patch introduces

Re: Questions on Jasper's BodyContentImpl, bug #43925, and proposed solution

2014-05-02 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2014-05-02 17:29 GMT+04:00 Scott Severtson ssevert...@digitalmeasures.com: All, We've developed a patch as proposed below, and have been running it in our production environment (currently Tomcat 6.0.37) for several months. The patch applies cleanly to the Tomcat 6.0.x, 7.0.x, and 8.0.x

Re: Subject: Questions on Jasper's BodyContentImpl, bug #43925, and proposed solution

2013-11-05 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Nov 1, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Scott Severtson ssevert...@digitalmeasures.com wrote: All, We've noticed that our Tomcat 6.0.37 instances have increasing overhead the longer they stay up. We've captured some heap dumps, expecting to find memory leaks within our code, but found something

Subject: Questions on Jasper's BodyContentImpl, bug #43925, and proposed solution

2013-11-01 Thread Scott Severtson
All, We've noticed that our Tomcat 6.0.37 instances have increasing overhead the longer they stay up. We've captured some heap dumps, expecting to find memory leaks within our code, but found something different instead. Jasper's BodyContentImpl is actually holding most of the