On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 17 14:14:28 2013
New Revision: 1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
Log:
Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
order and modify JasperELResolver so the
On 28/08/2013 13:00, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 17 14:14:28 2013
New Revision: 1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
Log:
Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: svn commit: r1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
Log:
Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
order and modify JasperELResolver
On 17/07/2013 15:21, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: svn
commit: r1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148 Log: Add the two new resolver
types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct order and modify
JasperELResolver so the
From: Nick Williams [mailto:nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net]
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1504148
I read so the correct resolvers are skipped as so the resolvers
that should be skipped are skipped.
That interpretation makes much more sense. I think the use of the word
correct twice in the
From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: svn commit: r1504148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
Log:
Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
order and modify JasperELResolver so the correct resolvers are skipped.
Did you really want
