2015-09-10 15:52 GMT+03:00 jean-frederic clere :
>
> On 09/10/2015 02:10 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't exactly know what is in trunk that couldn't be in a 8.1. The
>>
>> removals of existing features make a lot of the rest probably acceptable.
>> The EE schedule saying 2017, it's really
On 09/10/2015 02:10 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
I don't exactly know what is in trunk that couldn't be in a 8.1. The
removals of existing features make a lot of the rest probably acceptable.
The EE schedule saying 2017, it's really a long time to be in beta [or
not maybe;) ].
HTTP/2 seems t
2015-09-10 10:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> On 10/09/2015 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> > 2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
> >> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be
On 10/09/2015 09:36, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> 2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
>> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be with java9 and
>> the new servlet specifications. AKA
2015-09-10 10:13 GMT+02:00 jean-frederic clere :
> Hi,
>
> I have a wording questions from my ApacheCon presentations, I am using
> tomcat9 to speak about trunk but basically tomcat9 should be with java9 and
> the new servlet specifications. AKA far future.
>
I'm not sure it will require Java 9.
