On 19/06/2009, Xie Xiaodong wrote:
> No, I think line767 is still needed. You could turn to the last part of this
> article for reference: "
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html";.
Oops, my bad.
The code would still work, but it would sometimes create a new D
No, I think line767 is still needed. You could turn to the last part of this
article for reference: "
http://www.cs.umd.edu/~pugh/java/memoryModel/DoubleCheckedLocking.html";.
2009/6/19 sebb
> On 19/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> > Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
> >
> > 661:
On 19/06/2009, sebb wrote:
> Just spotted this duplicate code in AccessLogValve:
>
> 661:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
> 662:if (!dateStamp.equals(tsDate)) {
>
> Not sure this double-checked looking offers any benefit ;-)
>
Line 767 is als
