Mark Thomas wrote:
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final
stable release of 6.0.x.
Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch.
-1. Branches should continue to be open as long as
On Nov 6, 2007, at 7:37 PM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security
issue) final
stable release of 6.0.x.
Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch.
-1. Branches should continue to be open as
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final
stable release of 6.0.x.
Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch.
-1. Branches should continue to be open as long as committers want to
propose patches and make
Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 16:10 +, Mark Thomas wrote:
Do the (unless there is a pressing need - eg a major security issue) final
stable release of 6.0.x.
Freeze development of the 6.0.x branch.
-1. Branches should continue to be open as long as committers want to
After some more refinements, the plan to get us from where we are (RTC on a
stable 6.0.x branch) to where we want to be (6.0.x frozen, RTC on a stable
6.2.x branch, and a CTR dev branch) is:
Stage 1
===
Create a CTR dev branch now.
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk