Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-06-12 Thread Mladen Turk
Konstantin Kolinko wrote: so -win32-x86-native, -win32-x64 and -win32-ia64 would make perfect sense. Fine with me. 32 in -win32-x64 looks odd. Right win64-x64 would make more sense. In the /bin folder there is now a /bin/procrun subfolder, that contains /bin/procrun/amd64/ and

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-06-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Konstantin Kolinko wrote: so -win32-x86-native, -win32-x64 and -win32-ia64 would make perfect sense. Fine with me. 32 in -win32-x64 looks odd. Right win64-x64 would make more sense. Irrelevant. There is no win64, but there could be. Linux and most Unicies use

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-06-12 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Right win64-x64 would make more sense. Irrelevant. win32-x64 means nothing to an ordinary user. There is no win64, but there could be. What are u talking about? http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb496995.aspx MS clearly distinguishes Win32 and

Updated procrun binaries

2009-05-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, As you could see from the SVN log I've updated procrun binaries to 2.0.5 version (Tagged as COMMONS_DAEMON_2_0_5 in commons) It contains a fix that might help XP/SP1 and later using Java6 on systems that do not have msvcrt71.dll in the PATH (Something Sun refuses to fix) by using

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-05-29 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/5/29 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org: Hi, As you could see from the SVN log I've updated procrun binaries to 2.0.5 version (Tagged as COMMONS_DAEMON_2_0_5 in commons) It contains a fix that might help XP/SP1 and later using Java6 on systems that do not have msvcrt71.dll in the PATH

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-05-29 Thread Mladen Turk
Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Your removal of 64-bit GUI files broke the build scripts there. Sorry ;) Thought it will be easy to fix. Is suppose the copy task should just use the *.exe instead referencing the files directly (more reusable) Nevertheless, how about creating separate .zips

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-05-29 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Mladen Turk wrote: Nevertheless, how about creating separate .zips that would contain tomcat(X)w.exe tomcat(X).exe service.bat and tcnative-1.dll eg. apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win32-native.zip apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-native.zip apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-ia64-native.zip ia64 != x64, you

Re: Updated procrun binaries

2009-05-29 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Mladen Turk wrote: Nevertheless, how about creating separate .zips that would contain tomcat(X)w.exe tomcat(X).exe service.bat and tcnative-1.dll eg. apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win32-native.zip apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-native.zip