Re: [potential?] bug in Tomcat 7's websocket UpgradeUtil when handling concurrent connections that use a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator

2013-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/10/2013 21:14, Bob DeRemer wrote: First off, this is the 2nd [potential] bug I've reposted from the user list, so my apologies. After reading the mailing list descriptions, it seems potential bugs should be posted to the DEV list. If this is wrong, just let me know. Generally, if you

Re: [potential?] bug in Tomcat 7's websocket UpgradeUtil when handling concurrent connections that use a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator

2013-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/10/2013 21:14, Bob DeRemer wrote: Potential Bug? I [think] there may be a problem in Tomcat's static UpgradeUtil.doUpgrade logic when handling concurrent connection/upgrade requests that rely on a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator.modifyHandshake to grab

Re: [potential?] bug in Tomcat 7's websocket UpgradeUtil when handling concurrent connections that use a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator

2013-10-28 Thread Mark Thomas
On 28/10/2013 12:18, Mark Thomas wrote: I'm going to start work on updating Tomcat just as soon as I finish typing this. Try now. I've applied to fix to both 8.0.x and 7.0.x for the next release of each. Mark - To

RE: [potential?] bug in Tomcat 7's websocket UpgradeUtil when handling concurrent connections that use a custom ServerEndpointConfig.Configurator

2013-10-28 Thread Bob DeRemer
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:53 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: [potential?] bug in Tomcat 7's websocket UpgradeUtil when handling concurrent connections that use a custom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53151] Tomcat 7 SimpleTCPCluster.java does not send payload on Start Stop

2012-04-27 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 --- Comment #3 from Nilesh sapl...@yahoo.com 2012-04-27 06:01:48 UTC --- Thanks Keiichi for the detailed reply. Appreciated! Thanks Nilesh -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53151] Tomcat 7 SimpleTCPCluster.java does not send payload on Start Stop

2012-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 Nilesh sapl...@yahoo.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version||All --- Comment #1 from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53151] Tomcat 7 SimpleTCPCluster.java does not send payload on Start Stop

2012-04-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53151 Keiichi Fujino kfuj...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #6 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de 2011-06-30 08:14:57 UTC --- I think Mali is right and his test case is valid. If you try the servlet in a freshly downloaded tomcat you will get 0 as result. If you

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #7 from Felix Schumacher felix.schumac...@internetallee.de 2011-06-30 10:39:50 UTC --- Created attachment 27230 -- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27230 init every servlet if it is a SingleThreadMode

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-06-30 11:58:40 UTC --- Further investigation shows that o.a.catalina.startup.Tomcat (that is the basis for most of the unit tests) didn't handle SingleThreadModel servlets. I have fixed

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2011-06-30 12:17:35 UTC --- As an aside, I used a variation of Felix's patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #11 from Mali bhatu.m...@gmail.com 2011-06-30 12:59:43 UTC --- May I know how to fix this bug in tomcat 7.0.16 or I have to wait for tomcat 7.0.17 ! May I know the tentative date for tomcat 7.0.17 release ! -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #12 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net 2011-06-30 20:07:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) May I know how to fix this bug in tomcat 7.0.16 or I have to wait for tomcat 7.0.17 ! May I know the tentative

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net 2011-06-29 14:04:44 UTC --- Please provide a test case that fails on a current version of Tomcat downloaded directly from the Apache site. Mark's analysis is that the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 Mali bhatu.m...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal --- Comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51445] Tomcat 7 SingleThreadModel Problem

2011-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51445 --- Comment #3 from bhatu.m...@gmail.com bhatu.m...@gmail.com 2011-06-29 05:18:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) This works for me with the latest 7.0.x code. I've added to test case that checks this just to be on the safe side. (In

Re: Confirming a bug with Tomcat 7 and Java Mail.

2011-03-15 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/03/2011 23:11, Peter P. Lupo wrote: Just to be clear: you don't have to try sending an e-mail. Just add the jar and try to get a response or two from an app running on Tomcat 7. I don't see this error. The users list is the place to debug this. Mark

Re: Confirming a bug with Tomcat 7 and Java Mail.

2011-03-15 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/3/15 Peter P. Lupo ppl...@gmail.com: I would open an issue on Bugzilla but first I'd like to check it with you guys.  I'm trying to add mail.jar (Java Mail) to my app's lib (the problem also happens with tomcat's lib). It is quite simple. If I do it, I start getting Exception in thread

Confirming a bug with Tomcat 7 and Java Mail.

2011-03-14 Thread Peter P. Lupo
I would open an issue on Bugzilla but first I'd like to check it with you guys. I'm trying to add mail.jar (Java Mail) to my app's lib (the problem also happens with tomcat's lib). It is quite simple. If I do it, I start getting Exception in thread http-bio-8080 error and it keeps printing it

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50571] Tomcat 7 JDBC connection pool exception enhancement

2011-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 --- Comment #6 from Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org 2011-01-12 11:11:22 EST --- What I propose, is to fix the actual bug, of ConnectionState swallowing the exception on pool startup. And we fix this bug, without introducing new bugs by

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50571] Tomcat 7 JDBC connection pool exception enhancement

2011-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 --- Comment #7 from Jeremy Norris jnorri...@gmail.com 2011-01-12 12:37:33 EST --- Agreed, the actual bug is ConnectionState swallowing the exception on pool startup, however I suspect that fixing it properly will require some of the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50571] Tomcat 7 JDBC connection pool exception enhancement

2011-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 Filip Hanik fha...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50571] Tomcat 7 JDBC connection pool exception enhancement

2011-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50571 --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Norris jnorri...@gmail.com 2011-01-11 18:36:33 EST --- Hello, This initial use-case I was needing was for SQLExceptions originating in ConnectionState.reset() to propagate out of ConnectionPool.getConnection().

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-10-19 13:12:05 EDT --- I've done a little digging on this. The best definition of the required behaviour is actually in the Javadoc: quote Interface for receiving notification events

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #10 from Flávio Henrique serv...@ig.com.br 2010-10-19 16:57:02 EDT --- Thanks Marks, the fix of this feature will accelerate CDI adoption in TOMCAT. (In reply to comment #9) I've fixed Tomcat 7 so it fires the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2010-10-12 08:13:04 EDT --- I don't see any reason to add this to Tomcat but it will probably be optional behaviour. If added this to my list of things to keep an eye on when the EG starts

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #5

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #6 from Pete Muir pm...@bleepbleep.org.uk 2010-10-10 11:47:10 EDT --- (Unfortunately) the Servlet spec provides no guarantees of the behaviour of request listeners if a forward occurs e.g. for FORM auth or to an error page.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #2 from Flávio Henrique serv...@ig.com.br 2010-10-08 11:36:21 EDT --- Sorry, the problem is related to FORM authentication, not JAAS. Again: sorry for this mistake. I will prepare the test as soon I reach my Office. Thanks

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #3 from Flávio Henrique serv...@ig.com.br 2010-10-08 22:25:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26144) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26144) Tomcat FormAuthentication and CDI problem You will need to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 49991] Tomcat 7 JAAS problem with CDI

2010-10-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49991 --- Comment #4 from Flávio Henrique serv...@ig.com.br 2010-10-08 22:28:11 EDT --- Mark, here is the project for Eclipse Helios 3.6 SR1. You will need to grab Weld 1.1.0 and put weld-1.1.0.Beta1\artifacts\weld\weld-servlet.jar inside

is this bug in tomcat 7 ?

2009-04-14 Thread Anas Ahmed
hello all, mbean-descripator.xml in org.apache.catalina.tribes package is the same as mbean-descripator.xml in org.apache.catalina.ha package Anas _ More than messages–check out the rest of the Windows Live™.

Re: is this bug in tomcat 7 ?

2009-04-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
it's work to be done :) Anas Ahmed wrote: hello all, mbean-descripator.xml in org.apache.catalina.tribes package is the same as mbean-descripator.xml in org.apache.catalina.ha package Anas _ More than messages–check out the