On 12/07/2012 21:42, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> You are correct, I was chasing down the following:
>
> Testsuite: org.apache.catalina.websocket.TestWebSocket
> Tests run: 6, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 2.048 sec
>
> INFO: Starting ProtocolHandler ["http-nio-127.0.0.1-auto-
tests. I'm tempted to get rid of the -1 notion
all together, no sane person should ever use no timeout :)
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:20 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r
On 12/07/2012 21:11, fha...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Thu Jul 12 20:11:31 2012
> New Revision: 1360905
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1360905&view=rev
> Log:
> Correct handling of timeout - negative or zero means no timeout but an instant
Nope. The expected and documen
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jul 12 20:11:31 2012
New Revision: 1360905
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1360905&view=rev
Log:
Correct handling of timeout - negative or zero means no timeout but an instant
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/NioSelectorPool.java
Modified