me
code changes are required. Feel free to open a bz issue so this isn't forgotten.
Mark
>
>LieGrue,
>strub
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>> From: Mark Struberg
>> To: Tomcat Developers List
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:14 PM
&
: Sunday, July 29, 2012 1:14 PM
> Subject: Re: tomcat 7.0.29 startup time
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> thanks for the clarifications, highly appreciated!
>
> As far as the empty goes: After reading the spec
> again I've been down to that route as well. So far it didn'
omcat scan a bit too much
yet?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
> From: Mark Thomas
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2012 2:36 AM
> Subject: Re: tomcat 7.0.29 startup time
>
> On 28/07/2012 00:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
On 28/07/2012 00:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 25/07/2012 17:00, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi Lords and Ladies!
>>
>> I'm currently wrangling with a doubled boot time on tomcat7.0.29 in
>> comparison to 7.0.28 (12 webapps in my tc: 7.0.28 < 45s, 7.0.29 >
>> 90s).
>>
>> I'm aware that 7.0.29 now does th
On 25/07/2012 17:00, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi Lords and Ladies!
>
> I'm currently wrangling with a doubled boot time on tomcat7.0.29 in
> comparison to 7.0.28 (12 webapps in my tc: 7.0.28 < 45s, 7.0.29 >
> 90s).
>
> I'm aware that 7.0.29 now does the scanning for
> ServletContainerInitializer ev
Hi Lords and Ladies!
I'm currently wrangling with a doubled boot time on tomcat7.0.29 in comparison
to 7.0.28 (12 webapps in my tc: 7.0.28 < 45s, 7.0.29 > 90s).
I'm aware that 7.0.29 now does the scanning for ServletContainerInitializer
even if version=2.5 is specified. But there shall no class
