To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project tomcat-trunk-test-apr has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63441
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Just a note that the problem statement is correct but the analysis is not. I'm
still digging into what is going wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
ChristopherSchultz commented on issue #162: Add support for same-site cookie
attribute
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/162#issuecomment-492771440
+1 for making `SameSiteCookies` into an `enum`. It will also protect against
a malicious application causing Tomcat to emit a broken/
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4358
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedul
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 76830b1 Fix javadoc
76830b1 is described below
c
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4357
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 7b7442d Remove bad looking fields access
7b7442d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63389
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
Since this is synchronous, we can use the exit code to signal success or
failure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63389
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
I have a slight objection to the term "warmup" being used, here.
Can we call it something else?
Nothing brilliant comes to mind.
"updown"?
"startstop"?
"launchtest"?
Perhaps such a special launch
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63441
Bug ID: 63441
Summary: Changes made to newly created session not replicated
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
--- Comment #4 from marek.gregor ---
Our code has implementation of feeding metrics with sent/received number of
bytes from web server. Generally the metrics is important to check amount of
data transferred from/to web application in elegant w
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
--- Comment #3 from Remy Maucherat ---
I guess it would have to be counted in the SocketWrapper, but is that kind of
metric useful at all these days ? We know/expect it will be some random large
amount, and that's all it will say. At the same t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63237
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Has the ability to disable JMX made this enhancement request obsolete?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
What is the request here? Are new statistics required? Are changes to how the
existing statistics are calculated required? Specifics would help us to
evaluate the request.
The current statistics were impleme
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4356
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchSchedul
On 15/05/2019 13:48, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Oki, I can hear it is a lot of work for a small gain, however, at least,
> it is possible to ensure the disable method is re-callable (actually
> setting the registry instance) and that there is an enableRegistry()
> method. It is ok and cheap IMO to
markt-asf commented on issue #162: Add support for same-site cookie attribute
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/162#issuecomment-492644191
Thanks for the updates. I have a few comments on the updated PR:
- You can reduce the code duplication by using CookieProcessorBase
- Sa
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 2:25 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15/05/2019 12:56, r...@apache.org wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >
> > remm pushed a commit to branch master
> > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
> >
> >
> > The f
Oki, I can hear it is a lot of work for a small gain, however, at least, it
is possible to ensure the disable method is re-callable (actually setting
the registry instance) and that there is an enableRegistry() method. It is
ok and cheap IMO to have a global reference counting and force it to be ==
On 15/05/2019 12:56, r...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> remm pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
>
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new bd2ed0f Keep the try catch just in case
bd2ed0f i
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 4691266 Fix build
4691266 is described below
com
On 15/05/2019 10:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 9.0.20 got a disableRegistry method in Registry class (for JMX server
> interaction),
> I wonder if it is possible to enhance it a bit to make it instance bound
> to the server instead of being global.
>
> It would enable to start/stop/restart serve
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4355
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new c2d6278 Refactor socket wrapper close
c2d6278 is
Hi guys,
9.0.20 got a disableRegistry method in Registry class (for JMX server
interaction),
I wonder if it is possible to enhance it a bit to make it instance bound to
the server instead of being global.
It would enable to start/stop/restart servers potentially
deactivating/activating JMX withou
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 7848be1 Fix IDE warnings
7848be1 is described be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63389
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Thinking about this some more, I think the best way to handle this is with a
new "warmup" command. Implemented in a similar manner to configtest it would
call server.start() followed by server.stop().
--
Yo
28 matches
Mail list logo