https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63767
--- Comment #8 from 王化亮 <6900...@qq.com> ---
thank you very much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kfujino pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new dd2faec fix comment
dd2faec is described
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63771
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63771
Bug ID: 63771
Summary: A way to strip 'Secure' From the cookie
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.46
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63767
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
Installed Windows Update Agent 7.8.9200.16924 - no change.
Installed 2019-09 Preview of Monthly Quality Rollup for Windows Server 2012 for
x64-based Systems (KB4516069) - problem resolved.
This does indeed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63690
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
9.0.26 fixed a typo in the attribute name. You want overheadDataThreshold in
9.0.26 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63767
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
I have been able to re-create this. Here are a few more details for the record
en_windows_server_2012_vl_x64_dvd_917758.iso
- via My Visual Studio
- Standard install with GUI
- UK locale
- All other
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63690
--- Comment #19 from Boris Petrov ---
Mark, I'm observing a similar behavior on 9.0.26. The socket is closed even
when the `overheadDataThreadhold="0"` setting is set. Browser is Chromium
77.0.3865.90. I had to revert to 9.0.24 with that
Hello.
Recently we received complaints from a customer about slow response times (45
seconds) every morning. Every morning starting a fresh session in the browser
would require a long wait time for the first user, but once this hurdle had
been taken everything seemed to work fine.
We could
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63767
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
Found it. A good demonstration of my lack of C coding skills. I failed to
initialise a variable so it was non-NULL when I expected it to be NULL causing
Commons Daemon to try and call a function that didn't
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63767
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Already reported against Commons Daemon as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-408
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
This is a question, to start with at least, for the users mailing list.
Mark
On 25/09/2019 11:46, Gunnar Brand wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
>
> Recently we received complaints from a customer about slow response
> times (45 seconds) every morning. Every morning starting a fresh session
> in the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 17890c3 Refacfor to (hopefully) aid fixing
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder tomcat-trunk while building
tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4629
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler
Am 19.09.19 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas:
> On 19/09/2019 08:07, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> That is obviously spam.
> When discussing spam please don't quote the material - particularly any
> links - as getting the links published as many times as possible is the
> aim of the spam.
Will try to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63690
--- Comment #21 from Boris Petrov ---
Thanks for the tip, Mark. I'll try that tomorrow. But... is this setting still
needed? I thought that Tomcat 9.0.26 would remove the need for custom
configuration and would work out-of-the-box with Chrome
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 7.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/7.0.x by this push:
new 3ad2262 Fix test failures with APR/native.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new bfff085 Fix test failures with APR/native.
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push:
new 3aba970 Fix test failures with APR/native.
On 25/09/2019 21:39, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> markt pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
>
>
> The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/4630
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63690
--- Comment #22 from Mark Thomas ---
9.0.26 will handle the behaviour in the original trace. That doesn't mean there
isn't more "unusual" behaviour that will trigger the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63690
--- Comment #23 from Boris Petrov ---
Well, I'm not sure what exactly you mean, but if you need more stacktraces,
here you go:
```
javax.ws.rs.ProcessingException: Failed to buffer the message content input
stream.
at
23 matches
Mail list logo
