Re: tomcat source / eclipse project

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Thomas
Done. Mark Ian Darwin wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: I have something like this for TC5 & TC4. I do keep the files up to date because I use them every time I look at Tomcat code. I need to migrate my development areas from the old CVS structure to the SVN set-up. Once I have updated my eclipse

svn commit: r330947 - in /tomcat: connectors/trunk/ container/tc5.5.x/ jasper/tc5.5.x/ servletapi/servlet2.4-jsp2.0-tc5.x/

2005-11-04 Thread markt
Author: markt Date: Fri Nov 4 16:39:24 2005 New Revision: 330947 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=330947&view=rev Log: Add Eclipse 3.x build files. Assumptions include: - Checkout of /tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/ in workspace directory - Location of libs is workspace/../libs - Sufficient sour

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Costin Manolache
Well, my point was - do we really need this feature ? If nobody is really using it - it doesn't work out of box and we didn't see any major complaint except Bob - it may be simpler to just remove the flag from the docs and server.xml - and maybe even remove the code that does this validation. Or

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Jeanfrancois Arcand
Costin Manolache wrote: I wonder what Bob does when his Windows XP is crashing or catches a virus :-) Well, at least whoever reads the user mail at MSFT is paid for reading his rants, we're not. And they got his money too. As for the 'validate' flag - maybe we should just remove it: - it slows

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Costin Manolache
I wonder what Bob does when his Windows XP is crashing or catches a virus :-) Well, at least whoever reads the user mail at MSFT is paid for reading his rants, we're not. And they got his money too. As for the 'validate' flag - maybe we should just remove it: - it slows down startup - it is option

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Remy Maucherat wrote: Bob Bronson wrote: Another lazy copout!! Even the web.xml that is distributed w/Tomcat does not validate! Did you even test this before you replied to my note or did you just assume the user was at fault??? When someone criticizes the poor state of an open sores project

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Jean-frederic Clere
Bob Bronson wrote: Comments below, for any of you who care Friendly peoples always care about the needs of other... + CUT ++ I installed a fresh copy of TC 5.5.12 (using JDK 1.5.0 on Win XP). I went into the server.xml that is distributed with TC and changed the 'xm

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Ian Darwin
If you don't feel special enough, I can do it in two seconds and can get you a cool membership to the "dev-deny" list :) Maybe we could just filter out yahoo, hotmail and the other free fake web domains so that people who want to post abusive comments and use really original insults that we've

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37356] New: - Tomcat does not invalidate sessions after session-timeout period has passed.

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Rewrite features

2005-11-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bill Barker wrote: The TomcatResolver instance is holding a reference to the Request instance, and is in a TL. As a result (because of the way the ThreadPool works) it will live very much longer than just during the processing of a given Request. This is all fine for all of the current Connecto

svn commit: r330798 - /tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.java

2005-11-04 Thread remm
Author: remm Date: Fri Nov 4 03:51:02 2005 New Revision: 330798 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=330798&view=rev Log: - Use the new methods from Mladen in the AJP connector. Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/java/org/apache/coyote/ajp/AjpAprProcessor.java Modified: tomcat/connecto

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37351] - ORM support in Tomcat

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37350] - Problems serving large (50k+) static images on linux

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Sloppy, Lazy Tomcat Developers (Was: Persistent "xmlValidation" Problem)

2005-11-04 Thread Remy Maucherat
Bob Bronson wrote: Another lazy copout!! Even the web.xml that is distributed w/Tomcat does not validate! Did you even test this before you replied to my note or did you just assume the user was at fault??? When someone criticizes the poor state of an open sores project (as I am doing now), t

Iso Demirkaya/CH/BALOISE ist außer Haus. Ferien!

2005-11-04 Thread iso . demirkaya
Ich werde ab 04.11.2005 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 14.11.2005. Ferien. Bin zurück am 14. November 2005. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte an Till Schober 032 626 08 27 oder Roland Käser 032 626 08 24. Disclaimer: The contents of this email and any attachment thereto are in

RE: Rewrite features

2005-11-04 Thread Allistair Crossley
Hi, There is a lesser-known but very good rewrite project written as a j2ee filter available at http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/ Ready for use with web apps using context listeners to load rules and so fourth. I won't pretend to know about performance implications or why it's better to achieve r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31125] - conf/web.xml not valid

2005-11-04 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu