Costin Manolache wrote:
What I want is to be able to do cvs diff -r my_label_before_sandbox_copy,
so I can see what changed.
I want to keep my experiments in the sandbox - instead of a branch.
Costin
Copies are cheap in SVN, so tags are just copies. And in a similar
manner to CVS branches
I was not sure if you can tag a small subtree ( connectors/util/java )
, or only the entire connectors/.
I think I'll just do diffs by date - it's probably easier.
Costin
On 11/20/05, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
What I want is to be able to do cvs diff -r
Author: costin
Date: Sun Nov 20 10:19:56 2005
New Revision: 345767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345767view=rev
Log:
Remove even more dups. It seems the apr and non-apr were not actually in
sync, there are at least 2 places where extra SecurityManager magic was
used in non-apr.
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 11/19/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
1. Yes, it's how things should be done
2. No, it can be done better
My opionion is (2).
My opinion is 1. I will not participate in the design of the upcoming
Tomcat branch, then.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Sun Nov 20 10:19:56 2005
New Revision: 345767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345767view=rev
Log:
Remove even more dups. It seems the apr and non-apr were not actually in
sync, there are at least 2 places where extra SecurityManager magic was
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Markus Plail [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I recently wanted to upgrade to Tomcat 5.5.12 from 5.5.9. I use JAAS
realm with a custom implementation of LoginModule. I couldn't
authenticate myself with any of the username password combinations. So
I tried 5.5.11 and 5.5.10 but nothing changed.
The
Markus Plail wrote:
Not a single answer? Can't it be reproduced or what's the problem with
my problem? If I am right it would be a significant issue wouldn't it?
Sorry. Two bug reports about this, and should be fixed in CVS.
Rémy
I hope you are not serious... Sorry if I sounded too critical of the
APR code - it is a great
piece of code in many ways, I just didn't like some (probably minor) things.
If you have a problem with 'refactoring' - right now it is in sandbox,
and I can as well
change the package name and make it a
On 11/20/05, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Sun Nov 20 10:19:56 2005
New Revision: 345767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345767view=rev
Log:
Remove even more dups. It seems the apr and non-apr were not actually in
12 matches
Mail list logo
