DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
In line with what Filip wanted to have, I propose releasing a new 6.0.3
test build, which will incorporate the fixes that have been made since
6.0.2.
Comments ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
+1, let's cut it.
Yoav
On 12/4/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
In line with what Filip wanted to have, I propose releasing a new 6.0.3
test build, which will incorporate the fixes that have been made since
6.0.2.
Comments ?
Rémy
+1
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
In line with what Filip wanted to have, I propose releasing a new
6.0.3 test build, which will incorporate the fixes that have been made
since 6.0.2.
Comments ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Good news
2006/12/4, Jacob Hookom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
In line with what Filip wanted to have, I propose releasing a new
6.0.3 test build, which will incorporate the fixes that have been made
since 6.0.2.
Comments ?
Rémy
+1
BTW, Can we make minimum native version required
for 6.0.x to 1.1.7 (It's 1.1.3 right now copied
from 5.5.x)?
I mean there was no released versions of 6.0, and
the latest one has more stable API.
Regards,
Mladen.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
In line with what Filip wanted to have, I
Yoav Shapira wrote:
+1, let's cut it.
I am not going to tag it today (I need to populate the changelog a
little bit), but most likely tomorrow.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Hi,
I tested JSF since some people said the listener wasn't being found (the
said listener is declared in a TLD which is in a JAR). I found it worked
very well, but the way it is handled is funny because of the serialized
cache:
- Catalina will cache but will not bother when adding/removing
Was there ever a condition where the listeners wouldn't run?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I tested JSF since some people said the listener wasn't being found
(the said listener is declared in a TLD which is in a JAR). I found it
worked very well, but the way it is handled is funny because of
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jacob Hookom wrote:
Was there ever a condition where the listeners wouldn't run?
For example, you can run a webapp, then stop Tomcat, put the JSF JARs in
/WEB-INF/lib, and the JSF listener will not be run.
Rémy
-
To
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41106.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
AS FOR STYLE, I THINK ALL UNNECESSARY
WHITESPACE SHOULD BE BANNED AND TABS
MADE ILLEGAL, THEY JUST INCREASE
FILE SIZE TOO MUCH AND MY COMMODORE
64 JUST CAN'T HANDLE SOME OF THOSE
LARGE SOURCE FILES ALL IN ONE GO.
PLEASE WRITE YOUR JAVA LIKE THIS:
public class Foobar{private String
NAME;public
Author: remm
Date: Mon Dec 4 17:02:06 2006
New Revision: 482434
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=482434
Log:
- Add 1.2 as well.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/TagFileProcessor.java
I don't mean to be a pest, but want to check that everyone is clear that this
poll isn't a release vote; but it's a vote to start the process.
The results of what Remy rolls into a tarball - is what gets voted on after
its created. This is an example of 'voting on vapor' since that specific
20 matches
Mail list logo
