DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41463.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41864.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41530.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41786.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39530.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm searching for a method to reload my web application from within the web
app. Like a html-button that trigger something that reloads my web app when
the user clicks it. Annyone know a good way to do this?
--
View this message in context:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41956.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41939.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41849.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: pero
Date: Tue Mar 27 03:10:45 2007
New Revision: 522854
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=522854
Log:
Fix that pattern with subtokens ended, are print out subtoken
Example cs(Host) date time cs-uri sc-status x-C(JSESSIONID) time-taken
prints 'localhost:30014' 2007-03-27
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41849.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40593.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
What would be the main motivation for a new release ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41093.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41530.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
I personally think the AnnotationProcessor is a very questionable
idea and hope no one uses it. However, it is pretty common now.
The point of the adapter is to show that tomcat can still support
people who want to
Will it be a 6.0.11 beta or a release ?
2007/3/27, Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1
the NIO Memory leak fix is very important :-)
Peter
Am 27.03.2007 um 15:45 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Any thoughts on a 6.0.11 release?
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy about
it since it's slow, too.
Bug fixes
Ok, but with the latest round of changes you made, I'd rather wait
something like one week for some stabilization (the last I've seen
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 27 07:30:06 2007
New Revision: 522931
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=522931
Log:
On Socket.create create a local pool, because the
Socket.destroy destroys that pool, so the Pool.destroy
fails with crushing VM.
Modified:
David Jencks wrote:
compiled jsps
If you read the spec literally, they can't be annotated, but this is
quite arbitrary IMO (as soon as they're mapped in web.xml, they can).
I'm pretty sure that someone who had
more than my 2 days acquaintance with jasper could in a couple of
minutes point
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 27 08:23:27 2007
New Revision: 522954
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=522954
Log:
Fix typo
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: remm
Date: Tue Mar 27 08:53:15 2007
New Revision: 522964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=522964
Log:
- Skip BOM when reading a JSP.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/JspUtil.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi list,
I'm not sure if you'd prefer this to go to the user list, but I think it
probably belongs here, so I'll start here.
We have an application that is occasionally bumping into the 8K max
packet size of mod_jk, which causes our users to get a Request Entity
Too Large page.
I find the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy about
it since it's slow, too.
Bug fixes
Ok, but with the latest round of changes you made, I'd rather wait
something like one week for some stabilization (the last I've seen is
a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This is no longer the case, get the latest version and you should be
able to configure the packet size
Filip
Dave McMurtrie wrote:
Hi list,
I'm not sure if you'd prefer this to go to the user list, but I think
it probably belongs here, so I'll start here.
We have an application that is
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Mar 27 11:23:06 2007
New Revision: 523024
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=523024
Log:
Fix accept pool cleanup and destroy in case accept fails because of parent pool
destroy
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c
Modified:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
This is no longer the case, get the latest version and you should be
able to configure the packet size
I guess I can't ask for much better than that. Thanks for saving me a
ton of wasted time!
Dave
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41853.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The new Executor
It's a nice feature, but it's not urgent IMO. I'm not that happy
about it
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonsense build :) I
don't see any need to use log4j for Tomcat logging
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built
as part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonsense build :) I
don't see any need to use log4j
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That doesn't mean that the JAR has to be in the lib directory, all I'm
asking is that it is generated during our releases
I don't see any problem then. Since it is generated during the releases
if you type ant -f extras.xml, it should be possible for the RM to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41128.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
That doesn't mean that the JAR has to be in the lib directory, all
I'm asking is that it is generated during our releases
I don't see any problem then. Since it is generated during the
releases if you type ant -f extras.xml, it should be
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Mar 27 18:36:22 2007
New Revision: 523135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=523135
Log:
Enhancement request-bugzilla
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41128
Ability to track execution thread in the RequestInfo object for management
purposes
On Mar 27, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
David Jencks wrote:
compiled jsps
If you read the spec literally, they can't be annotated, but this
is quite arbitrary IMO (as soon as they're mapped in web.xml, they
can).
Doh! Of course you're right. I just haven't seen a jsp with
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 23:22 +0200, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built as
part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a no dependencies, no nonsense
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:45 -0600, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
oh, and can we have the JULI with support for commons-logging built
as part of the standard build?
if, yes, then I will be happy to do it
IMO, no. I'd like to keep a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41430.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
55 matches
Mail list logo
