Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
I've created a patch to clean them:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21797
Many thanks.
What is the history of this code before rev. 389146 of 2006-03-27 when
/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk was created?
As I recall, the whole EL implementation was provid
Author: fhanik
Date: Tue Apr 8 23:43:37 2008
New Revision: 646196
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646196&view=rev
Log:
votes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=64619
Surely, there are irregularities.
There are many places where java.lang.Class instance is not a
parameter to the method, but obtained in place by calling
obj.getClass(). In such cases comparing object's class against
primitive type classes is meaningless.
I've created a patch to clean them:
http
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-08 18:39:52
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=21797)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21797)
Code cleanup for org.apache.el.* - removes attemp
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 22:26 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Tue Apr 8 15:26:05 2008
> New Revision: 646106
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646106&view=rev
> Log:
> Better patch for 44766. I still can't see why the original code listed the
> classes individually.
ignore my prev email about the mem leak, I wasn't up to current in
trunk, and was running into something else
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Mon Apr 7 15:47:54 2008
New Revision: 645722
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=645722&view=rev
Log:
All of the issues I was see
just taking a quick look at the patch, this is a memory leak.
the buffer will simply grow larger and larger until an OOM happens, if
one keeps marking the buffer
when I am more awake, I'll help out on this, it's very easy to reproduce
http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/upload-mark.jsp
Filip
[EMA
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44354
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 8 15:52:49 2008
New Revision: 646121
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646121&view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 44436. Make sure -dev is reported in logs for dev builds. Align version
message with mod_jk.
Patch provided by Tim Whittington (with a very minor tweak)
Modified:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44436
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44438
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 8 15:38:19 2008
New Revision: 646111
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646111&view=rev
Log:
Fix bug 44438. Provide additional debug logging during initialisation.
Patch provided by Tim Whittington.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/iis/jk_isapi_plugi
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 8 15:26:05 2008
New Revision: 646106
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646106&view=rev
Log:
Better patch for 44766. I still can't see why the original code listed the
classes individually.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ELArithmetic.java
Modi
Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Well, obviously the new code is not equivalent to the old one, because
Long.TYPE and other TYPE constants are the classes for the primitive
types (long, int etc.), and those are not an instance of
java.lang.Number.
Yep my bad. I mis-read what my IDE was telling me. Tha
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 8 15:17:34 2008
New Revision: 646102
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646102&view=rev
Log:
Revert previous fix as it needs correcting.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ELArithmetic.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/el/lang/ELArithmeti
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Well, obviously the new code is not equivalent to the old one, because
Long.TYPE and other TYPE constants are the classes for the primitive
types (long, int etc.), and those are not an instance of
java.lang.Number.
>From the sources:
o.a.el.lang.ELArithmetic.isNumberType()
is used in
o.a.el.la
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44766
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-08 14:23:38 PST ---
I've committed a fix to trunk. The original code is a mystery to me too at the
minute.
I'll propose this for 6.0.x once people on the list have had a coupl
Author: markt
Date: Tue Apr 8 14:25:04 2008
New Revision: 646076
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=646076&view=rev
Log:
This fixes 44766 but I can't see why the code was written as originally coded.
Any light much appreciated. I'll give it a couple of days and then, assuming
there are no ob
You want tomcat-users, not tomcat developers. This list is for folks who
are building the Tomcat product. You will not get an answer here.
- Jim
Hi,
I haven't used Tomcat before and is the first time I am using it. I have Web
Service that is deployed on Tomcat 5 installed on my local system.
Hi,
I haven't used Tomcat before and is the first time I am using it. I have Web
Service that is deployed on Tomcat 5 installed on my local system. Web
Service I am using Spring, Hibernate. The issue I am facing is
after deploying a service all works fine. As soon as I leave the service
idle mea
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538
--- Comment #22 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-08 09:20:30 PST
---
Those were meant to be either or options.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Mass Dosage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |INVALID
--- C
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Mass Dosage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44777
Summary: additional entries in logging.properties ignored
Product: Tomcat 6
Version: 6.0.16
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priori
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41538
--- Comment #21 from John V Denley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-04-08 02:16:55 PST
---
Mark Thomas stated:
"Short term fix options:
- add %JAVA_HOME%\bin to the PATH
- copy %JAVA_HOME%\bin\mscvr71.dll to a folder on the path"
surely if
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44463
Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Apr 8 01:43:24 2008
New Revision: 645793
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=645793&view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 44463: War file upload in manager webapp fails due to missing
commons-io dependency. Added commons-io 1.4.
Part 3/3
Modified:
tomcat/current/tc5.5.x/STATUS.txt
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Apr 8 01:42:44 2008
New Revision: 645792
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=645792&view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 44463: War file upload in manager webapp fails due to missing
commons-io dependency. Added commons-io 1.4.
Part 2
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/webapps/docs
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Apr 8 01:42:02 2008
New Revision: 645791
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=645791&view=rev
Log:
Fix BZ 44463: War file upload in manager webapp fails due to missing
commons-io dependency. Added commons-io 1.4.
Part 1
Modified:
tomcat/build/tc5.5.x/build.properties
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44775
Olivier Jaquemet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44775
Summary: restart
Product: Tomcat 5
Version: Unknown
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows Vista
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catal
33 matches
Mail list logo
