problems with urlrewrite filter 3.2.0

2009-08-14 Thread danielecal...@gmail.com
Hi, I have istalled urlrewrite filter on my tomcat 5.5. The rewrite with the file urlrewrite.xml work, but I can’t configure the rewrite with the htaccess file…This is my files: THE CODE THAT I ADD TO WEB.XML FILE

Re: [proposal] remove worker based connector thread pools in trunk

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Here is why I think its good 1. Current pools can't shrink, so when peak has been hit, that's where were at 2. Current pools are unfair, synchronized (workers) { workers.wait() }, executors are a bit more fair since they only hold a lock for a short period

Re: problems with urlrewrite filter 3.2.0

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Thomas
danielecal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I have istalled urlrewrite filter on my tomcat 5.5. The rewrite with the file urlrewrite.xml work, but I can’t configure the rewrite with the htaccess file 1. This is the dev list, not the user list. 2. This is the Tomcat project, not the UrlRewriteFilter

svn commit: r804132 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-08-14 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Fri Aug 14 08:57:18 2009 New Revision: 804132 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=804132view=rev Log: vote and comment Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

svn commit: r804140 - /tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

2009-08-14 Thread kkolinko
Author: kkolinko Date: Fri Aug 14 09:38:01 2009 New Revision: 804140 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=804140view=rev Log: vote Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt URL:

Re: [proposal] remove worker based connector thread pools in trunk

2009-08-14 Thread Costin Manolache
+1 - Executor seems the right interface, didn't exist when workers were started - ifanyone needs the pool behavior it can probably be implemented as an Executor. I assume you'll have some way to configure what kind of executor ? Costin On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Mark Thomas

Re: [proposal] remove worker based connector thread pools in trunk

2009-08-14 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
On 08/14/2009 10:48 AM, Costin Manolache wrote: +1 - Executor seems the right interface, didn't exist when workers were started - ifanyone needs the pool behavior it can probably be implemented as an Executor. I assume you'll have some way to configure what kind of executor ? Yes we do,

/dev/urandom usage

2009-08-14 Thread George Sexton
I've got a question and it's kind of deep developer question. I was poking around today looking at my tomcat instance running under Linux. I was looking in the /proc/pid/fd directory, which is the list of file descriptors open by my servlet application. There are around 1400 open file

Re: /dev/urandom usage

2009-08-14 Thread Mark Thomas
George Sexton wrote: I've got a question and it's kind of deep developer question. I was poking around today looking at my tomcat instance running under Linux. I was looking in the /proc/pid/fd directory, which is the list of file descriptors open by my servlet application. There are

Re: Making AJP secret attribute consistent

2009-08-14 Thread Bill Barker
Since Mark has already removed the o.a.jk connector from trunk, I'd prefer to just fix the docs there and use requiredSecret etc. In the other branches it is easy enough to teach the o.a.jk connector to accept requiredSecrect as an alias for request.secrect, so even here I'd vote to add the

RE: /dev/urandom usage

2009-08-14 Thread George Sexton
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 5:57 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: /dev/urandom usage George Sexton wrote: I've got a question and it's kind of deep developer question. I was poking around today looking