[GitHub] [tomcat] rotty3000 opened a new pull request #302: Store common build details in a shared build-defaults.bnd

rotty3000 opened a new pull request #302: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/302 Signed-off-by: Raymond Augé This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[Bug 64528] Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- Correct HTTP/2 traffic isn't included in the the GlobalRequestProcessor metrics either. I'll add a note to Bug 63362. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 63362] GlobalRequestProcessor statistics in MBean does not count Websocket communication

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362 --- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas --- Note: HTTP/2 traffic is also excluded from the GlobalRequestProcessor metrics. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 64528] Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 --- Comment #4 from Markus Schlegel --- Given that it is related to the http/2 protocol upgrade, I think it indeed is related to Bug 63362. Nevertheless, since Tomcat Performance optimisation literature all over the net refers to

[Bug 64528] Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 --- Comment #3 from Markus Schlegel --- If I disable the http/2 upgrade, it works again: boolean ENABLE_HTTP2 = false; if (ENABLE_HTTP2) { Http2Protocol http2Protocol = new Http2Protocol();

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

Hi, Do you know if there would be a redirect of existing PR and "existing" references to master or does it break the ecosystem for a while - if so I'm not sure it is worth it ? If it does not break anything "latest" does not sound that bad and likely avoids this superior/inferior thought people

[Bug 64528] Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEW

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

Hi, On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 11:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to >

[Bug 64528] Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Fix BZ 64522 back port

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new 1c318d2 Fix BZ 64522 back port 1c318d2 is

[Bug 64527] JarWarResourceSet gc caused class loading slowly

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64527 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 64528] New: Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528 Bug ID: 64528 Summary: Regression in 8.5.56, no statistics in GlobalRequestProcessor MBean anymore Product: Tomcat 8 Version: 8.5.56 Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 64522] package jars in effective dependency order

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64522 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: Java library bug in JCEKS keystore loader

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael, On 6/13/20 14:54, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-06-12 um 23:54 schrieb Christopher Schultz: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 >> >> All, >> >> I've been writing a Java-based certification-expiration checking >> utility

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in effective dependency order

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new efa4cfc Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in effective

[GitHub] [tomcat] markt-asf merged pull request #301: Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in effective dependency order (only order…

markt-asf merged pull request #301: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/301 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

[tomcat] branch master updated: Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in effective dependency order (only order is changed, no other changes)

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new f94b2f3 Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in

Re: JPMS module names

On 16/06/2020 15:52, Raymond Auge wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:43 AM Mark Thomas > wrote: > > On 16/06/2020 15:00, Raymond Auge wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > I've extrapolated what I found as basis for a rule to create module > > names

Re: JPMS module names

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:43 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > On 16/06/2020 15:00, Raymond Auge wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > I've extrapolated what I found as basis for a rule to create module > > names and this is what I've come up with: > > > > module.name : >

Re: JPMS module names

On 16/06/2020 15:00, Raymond Auge wrote: > Hey folks, > > I've extrapolated what I found as basis for a rule to create module > names and this is what I've come up with: > > module.name : org.apache.${replace;${Bundle-Name};-;.} > > that is: > - take the `Bundle-Name` value

JPMS module names

Hey folks, I've extrapolated what I found as basis for a rule to create module names and this is what I've come up with: module.name: org.apache.${replace;${Bundle-Name};-;.} that is: - take the `Bundle-Name` value (which appears to have a consistent format) - replace dashes with dots - prefix

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Return correct response code for HTTP/2 when method is not implemented

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new cc53fc0 Return correct response code for HTTP/2

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Return correct response code for HTTP/2 when method is not implemented

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new dd2b95c Return correct response code for HTTP/2

buildbot success in on tomcat-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-trunk while building tomcat. Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-trunk/builds/5251 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu Build Reason: The

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

+1 for main On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 8:00 AM Coty Sutherland wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >>

[Bug 64522] package jars in effective dependency order

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64522 --- Comment #2 from rotty3000 --- https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/301 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe,

[GitHub] [tomcat] rotty3000 opened a new pull request #301: Fix BZ 64522 - package jars in effective dependency order (only order…

rotty3000 opened a new pull request #301: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/301 … is changed, no other changes) Signed-off-by: Raymond Augé This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[tomcat] branch master updated: Return correct response code for HTTP/2 when method is not implemented

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch master in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new a3fc47d Return correct response code for HTTP/2

[Bug 64527] JarWarResourceSet gc caused class loading slowly

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64527 aix3 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||springqi...@gmail.com -- You are receiving

[Bug 64527] New: JarWarResourceSet gc caused class loading slowly

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64527 Bug ID: 64527 Summary: JarWarResourceSet gc caused class loading slowly Product: Tomcat 8 Version: 8.5.39 Hardware: PC OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity:

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mark Thomas wrote: > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to > master/slave and

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

Am 2020-06-16 um 12:09 schrieb Mark Thomas: On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't,

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

On 16/06/2020 10:25, Michael Osipov wrote: > Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: >> All, >> >> You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF >> about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you >> haven't, the short version is that the name

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

Am 2020-06-16 um 10:02 schrieb Mark Thomas: All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to master/slave and its associations

[Bug 64522] package jars in effective dependency order

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64522 --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas --- Do you have a patch in mind for this? Or are you looking for input on what the correct order might be? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

Adopting editorconfig

Hi, We have an open pull request [1] that essentially means adopting editorconfig [2]. What does everybody think about this? I think this is doable of we start simple (along the lines of the PR) and expand it if/when there is consensus on additional settings. If we go this route, it raises

Re: Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

На вт, 16.06.2020 г. в 11:02 Mark Thomas написа: > > All, > > You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF > about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you > haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to > master/slave and

Changing the name of the default branch in our git repos

All, You may have seen the recent discussions both inside and outside the ASF about the user of "master" as the name of the default git branch. If you haven't, the short version is that the name can be traced back to master/slave and its associations with human slavery. I'd like to propose that