Sorry folks, but here are two more intermittent Http2 test failures:
2020-06-25T01:09:24.3494270Z[concat] Testsuites with failed tests:
2020-06-25T01:09:24.3496415Z[concat]
TEST-org.apache.coyote.http2.TestHttp2Section_5_3.NIO2.txt
2020-06-25T01:09:24.3497981Z[concat]
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
I'm skeptical of the usefulness of this patch, but I won't stop anyone from
applying it.
I have a short review of the patch as presented.
Request.java: I am -1 on this change
- public Principal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
What about roles containing commas?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505
--- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz ---
There might be some refactoring that could help, here. It seems that mostly you
are overriding the getPassword(Connection,String) and
getRoles(Connection,String) methods from DataSourceRealm, right?
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63493
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
The patch isn't high-load-safe because the counters are vanilla ints and you
use ++ for increment.
I think you'd at least need to use AtomicInt. You might want to consider
AtomicLong... those
rotty3000 commented on pull request #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/307#issuecomment-649013143
FYI the latest iteration of this runs on Java 8 - 15-ea + windows in 11
minutes https://github.com/rotty3000/tomcat/actions/runs/146537422
The arbitrary reduction was made
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63362
--- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas ---
Working on this. On HTTP/2 at the moment.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe,
Sorry about that. I've copied the entire build log here
https://gist.github.com/rotty3000/475d92ece3f41123e7092ab31ce30f53
Hopefully you can see that one?
- Ray
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:35 AM Eduardo Quintanilla
wrote:
> The link does not work.
>
> HTTP Status: 400
> Response:
The link does not work.
HTTP Status: 400
Response: {"count":11,"value":"Uri expired"}
Eduardo Quintanilla
Software Developer
From: Raymond Auge
Sent: miércoles, 24 de junio de 2020 10:29 a. m.
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: flaky HTTP2 test
You'll notice that in the same run that
You'll notice that in the same run that test passed on JDK 14 and 15-ea.
- Ray
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 11:26 AM Raymond Auge
wrote:
> See
>
See
https://pipelines.actions.githubusercontent.com/hQhYuytC86T1GsTs7qTvThq2ESqStTSskvOzwdA12PGOh7ZWVy/_apis/pipelines/1/runs/14/signedlogcontent/7?urlExpires=2020-06-24T15%3A25%3A51.1449322Z=HMACV1=O2PyO3WhK3FTDVz3t1sTeAGHP7IOlnynp8PZIfw%2BsOQ%3D
and search for "Running
On 24/06/2020 15:56, Raymond Auge wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> The test
> org.apache.coyote.http2.TestHttp2Limits
> seems to be flaky.
Haven't seen any issues with it recently either locally or with on of
the other CI systems.
Do you have a log from a failure case?
Mark
>
> I'm playing with github
Sorry. Auto completed to wrong list.
Mark
On 24/06/2020 16:10, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 24/06/2020 15:59, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just tried to figure out whether Tomcat 9 will let be send trailer
>> fields in a chunked HTTP/1.1 response, using
>>
>>
On 24/06/2020 15:59, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to figure out whether Tomcat 9 will let be send trailer
> fields in a chunked HTTP/1.1 response, using
>
>
Hey all,
The test
org.apache.coyote.http2.TestHttp2Limits
seems to be flaky.
I'm playing with github actions as per
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/307
and I've observed that this test arbitrarily passes or fails.
For now I will filter it out of my POC but I figured it might be relevant
rotty3000 commented on pull request #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/307#issuecomment-648872489
FYI, tomcat seems to build and test (nio) fine on Java 8, 11, 14 & 15-ea!
:+1:
This is an automated message
rotty3000 commented on pull request #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/307#issuecomment-648856220
I do not disagree that adding a third could be confusing. What I like about
actions in addition to the points you've made is:
- runs on forks as well (which means I can
The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder tomcat-9-trunk while
building tomcat. Full details are available at:
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomcat-9-trunk/builds/304
Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: asf946_ubuntu
Build Reason: The
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 0ab464c Fix incorrect argument processing
0ab464c
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 0be0a6a Fix incorrect argument processing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64544
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 5efa602 Fix BZ 64544 - add built libs to the bnd
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 18d048b Fix BZ 64544 - add built libs to the
markt-asf merged pull request #308:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/308
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
martin-g commented on pull request #307:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/307#issuecomment-648633491
So far we have:
1) Apache BuildBot as the official CI
2) Travis - for testing non-x86_64 architectures (at the moment: aarch64 and
s390x)
Do we need a third CI ?
25 matches
Mail list logo
