On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Felix Schumacher
wrote:
>
>
> Am 6. Juni 2017 20:39:44 MESZ schrieb Violeta Georgieva
> :
>>Hi,
>>
>>2017-06-05 16:51 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>>
>>> On 19/05/17 23:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > My proposal, adapted from the thread before discus
I went ahead and submitted
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61154 so I didn't
forget :)
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 02/06/2017 21:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Coty,
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 02/06/2017 21:29, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> Coty,
>>
>> On 6/2/17 2:15 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>>> I'm sure this has been brought up before, but I can't find it so I
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
> Coty,
>
> On 6/2/2017 11:15 AM, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>
>> If you guys think this is a bug I can file a BZ and fix it :D Or, mark
>> it as "Beginner" since it's trivial.
>
>
> If it'
Hi,
I'm sure this has been brought up before, but I can't find it so I
figured I'd ask...
A vanilla installation of tomcat fails to start the admin webapps with
the Security Manager enabled. This is because the manager and
host-manager webapps ship with a context.xml. The behavior isn't
documente
On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2017-05-31 6:07 GMT+03:00 Coty Sutherland :
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
>> bring in new contributors and to be more appea
Hi,
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Igal @ Lucee.org wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 5/31/2017 1:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On 31/05/17 04:07, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>>
>>> I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
>>&g
Hi all,
I've been thinking about things that we could do for Tomcat to help
bring in new contributors and to be more appealing to new developers.
Right now we have http://tomcat.apache.org/getinvolved.html which has
a few bullet points and links to documentation, which is a bit verbose,
about how
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 26/05/17 21:46, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I thought there was a BZ keyword for this, but there isn't. I've just
>> created an enhancement in BZ[1] that should be left for someone looking
>> to submit a small patch, and I'd lik
On May 26, 2017 07:46, "Mark Thomas" wrote:
On 25/05/17 18:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> All,
>
> At ApacheCon, a few of us were talking about things that could be
> removed in upcoming versions of Tomcat. The issue of connectors came up,
> and I was thinking that there doesn't seem to be a re
On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.15 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.13 release are:
>
> - Various improvements to the handling of static custom error pages
>
> - Update to Eclipse JDT Compiler 4.6.3
>
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.77 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.77/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/03/17 18:09, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In order to improve my build process I'm looking at utilizing maven to
>> build tomcat rather than ant (maven works with an existing toolset,
>> whe
Hi,
In order to improve my build process I'm looking at utilizing maven to
build tomcat rather than ant (maven works with an existing toolset,
whereas ant doesn't). Does anyone know of any groups that have tried
to do or are doing this, or any projects that I could look into? If
not, would anyone
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 29/03/17 16:56, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I see a good bit of discussion regarding testing trunk with java 9,
>> are we planning to test 8.5 with java 9 also? I've executed the unit
>>
Hi all,
I see a good bit of discussion regarding testing trunk with java 9,
are we planning to test 8.5 with java 9 also? I've executed the unit
tests for both and see that there are quite a few more failures on 8.5
than there are for trunk, so it seems that we've been fixing trunk but
not 8.5.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.13 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.12 release are:
>
> - Various HTTP/2 improvements
>
> - Fixes for sendfile related issues that could cause subsequent requests
>
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/03/17 14:11, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.76 release is now available for voting.
>>
>> It can be obtained from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.76/
>> The Maven staging repo is:
>> ht
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/03/17 19:57, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.12 release is now available for voting.
>>>
>>> The major change
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.42 release is now available for voting.
>
> The main changes since 8.0.41 are:
>
> - Limited relaxation of the HTTP request line validation
>
> - Support for Java 9 during annotation scanning
>
> - Update Tomcat Na
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.5.12 release is now available for voting.
>
> The major changes compared to the 8.5.11 release are:
>
> - Updates to the early access version of the Serlet 4.0 API to align it
> with the most recent discussions in
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/03/17 14:54, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Wed Mar 1 14:54:38 2017
>> New Revision: 1784959
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1784959&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Follow up to r1784807.
>> Removing PushToken cla
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 7:38 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Version 1.2.12 includes the following changes compared to 1.2.10:
>
> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2k
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2k
> - Better documentation for building on Windows
> (including with FIPS
Can anyone get the validate task to show this error? I think I know
what the problem is, but my local `ant validate` shows no problems...
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Bill Barker wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more informat
> LGTM. Thanks for seeing this through.
Awesome, no problem :)
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/02/17 19:42, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the suggestions; I implemented them in
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1782240
>
>
> LGT
Thanks for the suggestions; I implemented them in http://svn.apache.org/r1782240
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 07/02/17 18:13, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Tue Feb 7 18:13:40 2017
>> New Revision: 1782037
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/vi
2017-01-18 23:45 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.75 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.75/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
2017-01-19 1:07 GMT+02:00 Violeta Georgieva :
>
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.41 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.41/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/o
Congrats and welcome!
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 20/01/2017 à 18:12, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>> On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that
>> Emmanuel Bourg (ebourg) has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
>>
>> Please join me in welcomin
Hi all,
Do we intentionally ship the shell scripts along with the
tomcat-native and commons-daemon-native tarballs in bin for the
Windows distribution?
+++
$ ll apache-tomcat-7.0.73-windows-x64.zip/apache-tomcat-7.0.73/bin/ |
egrep '(tar.gz|sh)$'
-rw-r--r--. 1 coty coty 21646 Nov 7 23:29 catal
> I believe the committer names are sorted by family name...
> So probably you should not place yourself at last.
Yep, fixed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@t
> 1). *.html are generated files. Do not edit them manually!
Got it, sorry. Fixed! Thanks for catching that.
> 2). Please add yourself to the following page:
Done.
Cheers,
-Coty
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomc
mas wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 20:15, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>>> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki.
>>
>> Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up
>> link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that.
>
> Is th
> Yes. We need you MoinMoin ID for the Tomcat wiki.
Ah. OK, I created an account for the wiki (I didn't see the sign up
link before). It's "Coty Sutherland", if you need that.
> BZ account name? I'll add you as an admin
Awesome, th
Hi all,
I've been looking at the specifications listings on the
whichversions.html page and noticed JASPIC was missing, but is
implemented in 8.5+. I've added it on the site, but then I noticed
that it's also missing from the specifications page here:
https://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Specifications.
> That reference is correct. Tomcat 9 implements specs from Java EE 8.
Ah, I'll fix it. Sorry.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 21/12/2016 18:18, csuth...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: csutherl
>> Date: Wed Dec 21 18:18:32 2016
>> New Revision: 1775523
>>
>> URL: http://sv
> The proposed 8.5.9 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.9 (there's a typo here in the
> original email)
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additio
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.73 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.73/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:41 AM, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.39 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.39/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed 8.5.8 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [x] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.8
Unit tests look good and a few basic tests look good.
-
To unsubscri
Just a quick question for clarity regarding APR tests...we're testing
against the openssl-1.0.2-stable branch, correct? That passes fine,
but testing against trunk fails a couple of tests:
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.openssl.ciphers.TestCipher.testAllOpenSSLCiphersMapped
junit.framework.AssertionF
My vote is non-binding, but...
2016-09-26 19:17 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> Version 1.2.10 includes the following change:
>
> - Update minimum recommended OpenSSL version to 1.0.2j
> - Windows binaries built with OpenSSL 1.0.2j
>
> The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
> and the buil
I did this to further demarcate Milestone releases from Alpha
releases. If this sounds good to everyone, I'll push it up.
Thanks!
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Jarosław Górny
wrote:
> 2016-09-16 15:52 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
>> On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>
Ahh. That makes a lot more sense; thanks. I'll amend my patch and
attach it again in a bit.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/09/2016 13:59, Coty Sutherland wrote:
>> I'm not sure where to file a bug for this, but I produced a first pass
>> at a
s to convey the intent a bit better.
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 15 September 2016 16:32:36 BST, Coty Sutherland
> wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the
>>versioning scheme for to
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.72 release is now available for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.72/
> The Maven staging repo is:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/re
Hi all,
I'm getting quite a few questions on freenode in #tomcat about the
versioning scheme for tomcat 9. I looked at the
http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html page and it has some good
information there, but it doesn't mention what the milestone releases
are or how they fit into the alpha/b
Hi Micheal,
I hadn't heard of snaps (or used Ubuntu much) but the concept seems
interesting to me. Would you be able to send me links to what you have so
far so I can check it out? I have a few questions, but I'll reserve those
until I get a chance to review what you have.
Thanks!
On Sep 14, 201
On 31/08/2016 21:48, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The proposed 8.5.5 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
> [ ] Beta - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.5.5
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
>
2016-08-31 19:21 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed 9.0.0.M10 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 9.0.0.M10
+1
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote:
> The proposed 9.0.0.M10 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [ X ] Alpha - g
2016-09-01 12:56 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas :
> The proposed 8.0.37 release is:
> [ ] Broken - do not release
> [X] Stable - go ahead and release as 8.0.37
+1
Unit tests pass on linux with tcnative 1.2.8 and my test suite looks good.
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 01/09/2016
> It may have been branched in March, but wouldn't it have been branched from
> the 8.0 base? This change from 9.0 is not in the 8.5 code and the NPE still
> occurs.
No, 8.5 was branched from trunk and therefore included the revision
that you pointed out. Please see the dev list thread titled "T
> No. I just forgot to send out the announcement. I'll get that done shortly.
Cool, thanks!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Did this issue hold up the release announcement for 8.0.35? There was
a user in #tomcat asking why it wasn't announced and was concerned
that the release had issues.
-Coty
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
Understood. Thanks for the walk through; I think I understand what's going
on. I am going to read through the spec a bit more and verify though since
I don't know much of anything about EL :(
Thanks again!
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 09/05/201
Hi all,
I have a question regarding the way that the ResourceBundleELResolver (and
the BeanELResolver) function as part of investigations into the changes
made for https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46915 and then
reverted in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001 (very
Your -1 hasn't been seconded and doesn't seem to have sufficient
> technical
> justification. The change is only a harmless workaround in the default
> configuration and not even a code change. As a result, it is not a valid
> veto.
>
> Rémy
>
--
Coty Sutherlan
ix https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
> Implement an option within the Host Manager web pplication to persist the
> current configuration.
> Based on a patch by Coty Sutherland.
>
> Modified:
>
> tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/manager/host/HTMLHostManag
201 - 258 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
