Frédéric Viollet wrote:
Mark Thomas a écrit :
Frédéric Viollet wrote:
Hi,
I'm packaging Tomcat in a commercial product and I was wondering if I
also had to package the NOTICE file.
This is covered by section 4 of the Apache License, Version 2. See
http://www.apache.org/licenses
Folks,
A long time ago we voted to stop receiving these notices. When Bugzilla moved to
the new server, they started up again. As no-one has complained about them
starting up again, I have left them running.
However, in an effort to try and make them more useful I have dropped Watchdog
and
The RC at http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.19/bin/ seems to be
suffering from https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46910
Remy - I can't reproduce this on my machine so it looks like an issue with your
build environment. Can you take a look?
Cheers,
Mark
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 16:59 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
The RC at http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.19/bin/ seems to be
suffering from https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46910
Remy - I can't reproduce this on my machine so it looks like an issue
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:22 +0100, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 17:17 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
What platform are you running on these days?
Linux. But OTOH, the filtering is 100% useless (except for
ServerInfo.properties).
Ok, it seems I need to use
All,
I have been looking at trunk for opportunities to remove duplicate / obsolete
code. We currently have two BIO AJP connectors:
- org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler
- org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProtocol
I would like to remove org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler and associated
classes.
What
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I have been looking at trunk for opportunities to remove duplicate /
obsolete
code. We currently have two BIO AJP connectors:
- org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler
- org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProtocol
I would like to remove
Shaban Ghumri wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know based on your experience with TomCat, if there are
tools that I can use to debug a potential memory leak on servlet running on
TomCat 3.2?
Thanks in advance!
This question belongs on the users list, not the dev list. Please
review the
Bhat, Deepak (STSD) wrote:
Hi all,
I am facing a problem with my application trying to retrieve
data through the tomcat server.
This question belongs on the users list. Tomcat does cache static
resources and this is configured at the context level. See cacheTTL and
cachingAllowed on
Joe Hertz wrote:
Because like I said before, as long as these deprecated methods are being
used, Tomcat's javax.servlet.* implementation's days are numbers. The next
JDK won't have these methods. Then it's game over. No compilation under the
next JDK. If the spec hasn't changed, nor your
On 5/18/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: costin
Date: Thu May 18 17:58:16 2006
New Revision: 407674
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=407674view=rev
Log:
Cleaning up the sandbox
Removed:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java
Mark Thomas wrote:
You do an svn copy and specify the version number. Not sure of the exact
syntax. I use Tortoise SVN and do a revert this version from the log view.
I'll do this now.
Hmmm. Not working. Back to the command line...
Once i have worked out what it is, I'll post it here
David Gagnon wrote:
Hope that oki. I look the 5.5.17 code and the problem is still there.
Is that the right way to submit a Patch. If I need to open a bug
directly, let me know
It is usually best to open a bug report and attach your patch. This
way, it is less likely to get overlooked if
All,
Having just closed the last open bug for 4.1.x (only enhancement
requests left) now seems like a good time for a 4.1.32 release.
I am volunteering to be the release manager and given the discussions
on voting at the time of the last 5.5.x release, I am proposing the
following:
- vote to
It is implied, given I started the thread but to make it clear...
[X] +1 I am in favour of a 4.1.32-beta release
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian M wrote:
However, I'm having some problems understanding the structure of the
whole project because the apparent inconsistency between the
documentation (Tomcat API for v. 5.5) and the source code in the (5) Tomcat
projects. For instance, I cannot locate the org.apache.jk.* packages
Tom Miller wrote:
If none of you volunteer I will have to post my need on the
list and keep bother you all until I get some solution (-:
(-:
Or until I or one of the other list owners get fed up with your spam
and unsubscribe you. I'll keep hassling you until you help me isn't
what open
This question belongs on the users list. Please see
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html for more info.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's 2 +1's and a +0. Any committer care to chip in with another +1
so I can go ahead with the beta release?
Cheers,
Mark
Peter Rossbach wrote:
[x ] +1 I am in favour of a 4.1.32-beta release
Great job :-)
peter
-
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for UML diagrams and sequence diagrams.
Sorry, they don't exist.
About mod_jk.c, my file is quit huge (2757 lines wc -l mod_jk.c) and
there is not a lot of comments so I've some issues to understand it,
is there others docs?
Again. Sorry, but no. What
Mark Thomas wrote:
+1's
Mark Thomas
Peter Rossbach
Bill Barker
Filip Hanik
Remy Maucherat
Rainer Jung
+0's
Yoav Shapira
The release of 4.1.32 beta is therefore approved by the Tomcat PMC.
I'll cut it this weekend with the announcement going out once it is on
the mirrors.
Regards,
Mark
Bill,
Thanks for clarifying things. I read through
http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases but didn't find anything as
definitive and clear as your summary. I'll happily follow the process
you outlined for 4.1.32
To clarify the position on the beta status, the Tomcat project has
historically (at
All,
Following Bill's advice I am re-running this vote based on a tarball.
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz 6d02184d961954a6670db2d0c1e9c39e
apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.zip
Mark Thomas wrote:
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.
To kick things off, here is my +1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
I am not a tomcat expert. I got the apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz from
the link u have given. It seems to be build.xml and build.properties files
are missing in the root folder
The Tomcat 4 build structure is slightly different to TC5. The main
build.xml is in
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Build 4.1.31 was really more easy.
My intention was for the src download to mirror the SVN structure so
building from a checkout of
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x and building
from the src are exactly the same process. It is a change but it
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
What is the reason for this move? In tomcat 5.0 and tomact5.5 (even in
4.1.31 as i remember) build is created very smoothly when I run ant from
the
root folder.
So building from an svn checkout and building from a src tarball use
exactly the same process.
The build
This question belongs on the users list. See
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html for more information.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jitendra Kharche wrote:
Hi there, can anybody help me on this. I have posted this problem in
user mailing list 3-4 times in last two weeks but I havn't got any reply
that can solve my problem. Please help me.
This message does not belong on the dev list. Please keep this thread
on the users
Joachim Fuchs wrote:
My question is, what is this call good for? It results in an NPE, which is
caught a few lines later.
Or did I miss anything? Are there any side effects that are not obvious?
It prevents a memory leak. See
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=109449671603358w=2
and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add 4.1.32 beta
I haven't forgotten the announcement e-mail. When I first tried to
upload the 4.1.32 files we had a power cut for about 8 hours just as
the upload was getting started. I fixed things this morning once we
had power back but the mirrors haven't sorted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat v4.1.32-beta. This release contains dozens of bug fixes and
a number of other updates. Please consult the release notes included
in the distributions for more details.
Surya Bob wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to tighten up our Apache and Tomcat implementation. I want
to suppress server type and version to make fingerprinting harder.
This question belongs on the users list. Please repost it there.
Mark
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the config that IMHO each committer using
TortoiseSVN should set up.
There is already an Apache wide recommendation that would appear to be
more comprehensive.
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
Mark
Mladen Turk wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Here is the config that IMHO each committer using
TortoiseSVN should set up.
There is already an Apache wide recommendation that would appear to be
more comprehensive.
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
Great!
I just wish something like
Nikita Belov wrote:
Why are you ignoring me? Am I state my question so incomprehensible or
is my English so bad?
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/tomcatuser.html#why
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Lichtenfeld, Enno, ext. wrote:
Hi,
we need a Jakarta connector for Win2K3 Server (x64) with IIS 6.0.
This question belongs on the users list since it is about how to use
Tomcat.
The dev list is for questions related to the development (ie changes
in source code) of Tomcat.
Mark
Gregor Schneider wrote:
Hi list,
ok, one problems is solved so far, after I plugged my eyes back in I saw
how
to get hold of the Container (sometimes it's useful to read the Tomcat-Docs
rather than the Sun-Docs...
This question belongs on the users list. Please redirect your enquiry
to
jeusdi wrote:
Hello, I've configured Apache Web Server with mod_jk2 to communicate it with
Apache Tomcat 5.5. Mmm, I've created a Web Application with one JSP
(index.JSP) and one Servlet (it is performed form JSP).
All is ok, but when I access to my web Application the result is the code of
Gregor Schneider wrote:
Hi Mark,
I know that this usually belongs to the userlist, however, after a few days
zero answers - it seems as nobody there has the knoehow to answer those
questions :(
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/tomcatuser.html#why
prakash shanmugam wrote:
hai all,
i have one major issue in my project..
This question belongs on the users list.
users is for questions about developing applications that are hosted
on Tomcat.
dev is for developing Tomcat.
Mark
Vinaya Tirikkovalluru wrote:
Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
This question belongs on the users list. Please redirect your question
there.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
+0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira.
Mark
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ?
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
+0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira.
Why exactly ?
Continuity. It is easier to have all bugs in a single system than to
field the continual There wasn't a option for Tomcat X when creating
a new bug so I filed
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.33 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.33-src.tar.gz c4fbeda65a3d7418b129d5ec69fa18de
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If this VOTE passes, a stability vote will be held a suitable
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.33 as beta.
+1, in case it wasn't obvious ;)
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
+1 for the release.
I've added versions 4.1.33, 5.5.18, and 6.0.0 to Bugzilla so that we
have one less thing to do when we cut those releases...
Thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
All,
This vote passed (thanks to those that voted) but with the help of
Simon Kitching on the commons-dev list bug 40252 has been fully
resolved. Therefore I do not intend to go further with this release
but to go to 4.1.34. This also allows the RELEASE-NOTES changes raised
earlier today to be
Haven't been able to determine why, but the win32 binary for JK 1.2.18
doesn't work with IIS5. JK 1.2.15 works without a hitch.
There have been a number of similar reports on the users list.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
There is one serious bug in 1.2.18 that makes
it unusable for IIS if there is a missing optional
directive (rewrite_rule_file).
Thanks for your message on the users list about this.
Since we had already lots of commits fixing various
problems, 1.2.19 is something
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz 3c6aaa47279a33d8e256af620ddaac9b
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If this VOTE passes, a stability vote will be held a suitable
For the record, +1
Mark
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu Aug 31 05:46:58 2006
New Revision: 438898
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438898view=rev
Log:
I'm not an native English speaker, but the
'Changes with' compared with 'Changes in' or
'Changes from' sound more reasonable to me.
As a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: remm
Date: Fri Sep 1 06:54:50 2006
New Revision: 439322
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439322view=rev
Log:
- Revert the fix, since the situation described in the bug is not valid (and
I'm afraid my boss would murder me
if there's a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's possible it would not cause any regression, I don't know for sure
(it's a bit the issue).
The original claim was to fix 39704, which cannot be fixed (the bug is
really invalid, for the reasons I stated inside the bug, since when
creating the loader the privileged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat 4.1.34-beta. This release is a bug fix release that resolves
the issues reported against Tomcat 4.1.32-beta. Please consult the
release notes included in the
Sriram Narayanan wrote:
On 9/12/06, Yoav Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer #2, to give the user(s) a chance to help us out or at
least tell us they're no longer using that Tomcat version, or
whatever.
Ack. Thanks.
So far you seem to be too quick to mark things as invalid.
Bill Barker wrote:
But in this case, almost all of them are for 3.2.x, which hasn't had a
maintainer in over five years :). IMHO, you could mark them all as WONTFIX.
I'm happy enough that Sriram is actually testing against 3.3.2.
Anyone looking at open bugs is a good thing and I welcome
On 02/03/2010 00:20, Sandro Martini wrote:
My post here is to see if someone of Tomcat developers is interested
in supporting us making a Console for Tomcat, but instead of usual Web
pages, making it as a RIA Applet or an Application (for example
deployed via Web Start). Or at least if you think
On 02/03/2010 19:54, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Time for another one folks? Should I tag end of this week?
There has been a lot of code changes in the 5.5.x branch, so I would
expect some regressions, (similar experience to 6.0.x). So after this
one, we can roll a bit more frequently
On 03/03/2010 11:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/3/2 ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Mar 2 16:02:25 2010
New Revision: 918093
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=918093view=rev
Log:
Better fix for https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
As per
On 03/03/2010 21:01, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 3 21:01:48 2010
New Revision: 918686
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=918686view=rev
Log:
Proposal
This is the remaining regression in 6.0.24/25. Assuming this gets the
votes, once it is committed I think we'll
On 03/03/2010 21:12, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
1) first of all THANK YOU for providing some solutions to those problems.
It's not perfect, but it's very valuable
Glad you are finding it useful.
2) About JreMemoryLeakPreventionListener : Here are other leaks I know of :
2.1) When using JNDI for
On 04/03/2010 00:28, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Mar 4 00:28:47 2010
New Revision: 918792
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=918792view=rev
Log:
Followup to markt's r918594
Replace tabs with four spaces. No functional change.
Sorry about that. Rebuilt my
On 04/03/2010 18:06, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Mar 4 18:06:21 2010
New Revision: 919100
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919100view=rev
Log:
Lifecycle refactoring.
Part 1 of many.
Better define the start and stop methods as well as the overall component
On 04/03/2010 18:48, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
- do not have svn:eol-style.
/ME swears loudly
Thanks. I thought I'd fixed that. Obviously not...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
On 05/03/2010 02:47, hwachung feng wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build Tomcat 5.5 following the instructions on the page on
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/building.html
I am running into problems with the main build.xml that is trying to check
out Tomcat source from the svn
On 05/03/2010 07:21, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Just that JIRA stuff has been created for the GSoC. Should we move our
entries there?
Having a Tomcat project in Bugzilla and JIRA is going to lead to folks
creating bug reports in the wrong place.
Mark
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 05/03/2010 09:18, Shirely wrote:
I have a Tomcat 6.0 run at Window Server 2008. We mainly used it to show some
dynamic JSP by running java method at background. However, I found that
tomcat server sometimes run abnormally.
When we use a web browser, e.g. IE 8 to access the Tomcat jsp
On 04/03/2010 07:49, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/04/2010 04:04 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on it..
There is still a regression to vote (and test): bug 48827.
If no other problems the release should happen early next week.
The
On 05/03/2010 10:36, Bill Barker wrote:
Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote in message
news:4b90c4e6.2040...@apache.org...
On 05/03/2010 02:47, hwachung feng wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build Tomcat 5.5 following the instructions on the
page on
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc
On 05/03/2010 13:50, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/3/5 ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Fri Mar 5 09:38:52 2010
New Revision: 919349
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919349view=rev
Log:
Vote
* Improve logging behaviour when shutdown occurs via a shutdownhook. If
On 05/03/2010 16:37, hwachung feng wrote:
did the following (on top of checkout)
cd build
ant download
and it choked when it tries to compile dbcp-1.2.2 as shown in the build
output below:
Did you read the bit about not trying to compile with Java 6?
Mark
On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
Monday.
Comments?
+1. Do you really mean release on Monday? I'm all for that if you can
get the votes quickly enough.
Mark
On 06/03/2010 10:39, Rainer Jung wrote:
I lost track w.r.t. UTF-8 conversion: is it still OK to use ISO-8859
encoded message strings in the tc 5.5.x LocalStrings_XX.properties
files? We removed all of them in trunk and TC 6.0.x but there are lots
of them in TC 5.5.x. Any need to change?
To be
On 06/03/2010 14:48, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sat Mar 6 14:48:02 2010
New Revision: 919772
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919772view=rev
Log:
proposal
Modified:
tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
Modified: tomcat/tc5.5.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL:
On 06/03/2010 22:05, Bharath Vasudevan wrote:
BUILD FAILED
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: gnu/classpath/Configuration
Don't use gnu - download a Sun JDK.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 07/03/2010 02:43, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sun Mar 7 02:43:12 2010
New Revision: 919914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919914view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Fix remaining issues in BZ48668
The idea behind this
On 07/03/2010 10:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/03/2010 02:43, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sun Mar 7 02:43:12 2010
New Revision: 919914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919914view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Fix remaining
On 07/03/2010 11:05, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/03/2010 10:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/03/2010 02:43, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Sun Mar 7 02:43:12 2010
New Revision: 919914
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919914view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org
On 07/03/2010 14:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Can it be related that my change to Compiler.java sets those PageInfo
attributes as boolean, but PageInfo stores them both as boolean and as
a String.
This patch will fix that:
On 07/03/2010 16:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/03/2010 14:24, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Can it be related that my change to Compiler.java sets those PageInfo
attributes as boolean, but PageInfo stores them both as boolean and as
a String.
This patch will fix that:
http://people.apache.org
On 07/03/2010 18:45, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Mar 7 18:45:50 2010
New Revision: 920055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920055view=rev
Log:
Both TLD and web.xml determine if deferred EL syntax is treated as EL or as a
literal
With this, the updated tests for
On 07/03/2010 21:14, Bharath Vasudevan wrote:
My classpath is set for the tomcat working directory. Looks like
apache.ant.org is down now (so couldnt see what it should be set to).
That is ant.apache.org
As you'll see from http://monitoring.apache.org/status/ it is the EU
mirror that is down.
On 07/03/2010 21:26, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/3/7 Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com:
2010/3/7 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 07/03/2010 18:45, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sun Mar 7 18:45:50 2010
New Revision: 920055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev
On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
Monday.
Comments?
+1. Do you really mean release on Monday?
hm
On 06/03/2010 22:49, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
On 03/03/2010 21:12, Sylvain Laurent wrote:
3) a couple of months ago I had proposed on this very list a kind of memory
leak protection
for those leaks caused by threads with incorrect CCL. I called this the
ExpendableClassLoader.
Please have
On 09/03/2010 15:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/3/9ma...@apache.org:
Author: markt
Date: Tue Mar 9 15:01:05 2010
New Revision: 920907
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920907view=rev
Log:
Review feedback
1. getNameFromAttribute() returns the attribute name, not the variable name and
On 08/03/2010 17:34, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2. I think that we can have C-T-R for any svn metadata (svn:
properties), as those are not the code. I am +1.
+1 for line endings, +0 for the rest
3. I think that we can have C-T-R for any whitespace changes in the
code. These are generally
On 09/03/2010 06:05, Bill Barker wrote:
I've added a project to Gump to run the unit tests for TC 7. If I
haven't gotten the configuration right, it may nag for a bit until I
do. If so, apologies for the spam.
Cool. Many thanks.
Mark
On 09/03/2010 17:19, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
OpenPGP signatures verified
Signing key in ASF
On 10/03/2010 11:43, Bill Barker wrote:
-ERROR- Missing Output:
/srv/gump/public/workspace/tomcat-trunk/output/build/lib/tomcat-juli.jar
-ERROR- See Directory Listing Work for Missing Outputs
-INFO- Failed to extract fallback artifacts from Gump Repository
I think I have fixed this. We'll
On 10/03/2010 17:46, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:35 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Mar 10 17:35:43 2010
New Revision: 921464
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921464view=rev
Log:
Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
If
On 11/03/2010 11:09, pannar wrote:
Because ANT is a command file; you need to CALL that too.
PLEASE tell me how??
As you have been told mulitple times now:
THIS QUESTION BELONGS ON THE USERS LIST.
Please move this thread there.
Mark
this development only. I'll
make those changes and re-propose the patch.
Mark
On 3/10/2010 12:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I did consider that but I was working on the basis that in production
you wouldn't (OK shouldn't) have broken JSPs that don't compile. In that
scenario with valid JSPs if you don't pre
On 12/03/2010 11:32, buddhika chamith wrote:
Hi All,
I am interested in working on the JMX related project idea.
Great.
I am in the
process of going through the documentation and sources relating to JMX in
Tomcat. Excerpt of the idea mentions that Tomcat instance to be configured
entirely
On 12/03/2010 12:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 12/03/2010 11:32, buddhika chamith wrote:
Hi All,
I am interested in working on the JMX related project idea.
Great.
I am in the
process of going through the documentation and sources relating to JMX in
Tomcat. Excerpt of the idea mentions
On 14/03/2010 07:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I would suggest that we use JIRA instead maintaining STATUS.txt files.
Each branch can then be a separate component and each status vote
JIRA issue classified as either bug, feature, etc...
Voting is supported except that one cannot vote for the
On 19/03/2010 09:25, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/19/2010 09:23 AM, Apache Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
+ Quickstart guide to embedding Tomcat 7
+ By Mark Thomas:
+
+ . Tomcat has always been embeddable but with Tomcat 7 it has been
much simpler. This presentation will show you how you
On 19/03/2010 14:32, Ian Darwin wrote:
BTW, I saw you have Becoming a Tomcat 7 super user.
Perhaps Introducing Tomcat 7 would be a logical forerunner to this
talk ?
Filip, Tim, Yoav. Anyone of you guys interesed ?
I was thinking about that last night, but I have to check my schedule
and
901 - 1000 of 8969 matches
Mail list logo
