Rainer Jung wrote:
Before I answer, let me first ask a question: What's wrong withg my
suggestion? Or even better: use the encoding done with mod_proxy_ajp?
Because it doesn't solve the real problem.
Original URI:
/myapp/%252e%252e/otherapp/danger
JkMount /myapp/*
Apache httpd will corr
Bill Barker wrote:
Now the reverse proxy should have the ability to modify the URI (in the
sense of mod_rewrite). If we accept, that mod_rewrite in httpd 1.3-2.2 is
only able to operate on the decoded URI, we have no chance of making this
interoperable with forwarding the original undecoded U
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If possible when new versions of Tomcat native be announced on list?
Seems Tomcat 6.0.13 requires 1.1.10. First I became aware of it, was
when user reported the problem. Granted I should have discovered it
bef
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended
is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started.
I'm not sure what more is needed.
According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10
Hi,
I've committed to the trunk the modified service.bat that
automatically detects the host CPU (x86, amd64, ia64) and
whether the JVM is 64 bit or not.
So it automatically picks tomcat6.exe, amd64/tomcat6.exe
depending on the above rules.
However it requires that the .zip distro contains those
Rainer Jung wrote:
I suggest, that we build against httpd 2.x always thread-safe, at least
unless the existing flag -enable-prefork is used and document this
behaviour.
+1
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Correct pthread_t casting in jk_gettid().
Needed at least on Mac OS X,
shouldn't hurt on other platforms.
-int tid = (int)(t & 0x);
+int tid = ((int)t) & 0x;
Since thread id is a pointer, think it can even be
rounded to the sizeof t
Something like ((int
Jean-Frederic wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Jun 4 05:08:33 2007
New Revision: 544137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=544137
Log:
Add simple URI normalizer that can deal with things like %252e%252e. This is
mostly copy
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Jun 4 05:08:33 2007
New Revision: 544137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=544137
Log:
Add simple URI normalizer that can deal with things like %252e%252e. This is
mostly copy/paste from the IIS module
Mark Thomas wrote:
>> mod_jk 1.2.23 (with default passing r->unparsed_uri) will return 404
>> from Tomcat becasue it will pass the original uri, not the one Httpd
>> already unfolded)
> This is correct and provides consistent behaviour for direct to Tomcat
> access and access via mod_jk.
>
It is
Mark Thomas wrote:
Did I mention that uri is *not* decoded twice?
You did and I still don't agree. The root cause of CVE-2007-1860 was a
double decoding. Once in httpd/mod_jk and once in Tomcat.
Why do you don't agree?
Please provide a use case and confirm your statements are
legitimate.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
As I see it, we have two options:
a) Prevent Tomcat from decoding the uri a second time at step 7 above
b) Re-encode the uri in mod_jk between steps 5 and 6
I think:
- it's the proxy which should have options for adapting to what the
proxied server do
Mark Thomas wrote:
Single ajp13 worker
jkMount /jsp-examples/* worker1
A simple 'hello world' html file was created at (directories created
where required):
/jsp-examples/%2e%2e/servlets-examples/index.html
Test 1: Tomcat only
http://localhost:8080/jsp-examples/%252e%252e/servlets-examples/i
Jean-Frederic wrote:
>>> Add ForwardURIProxy to the URl handling option.
>>> common/jk_url.c is just a porting of the routines
>>> from proxy_util.c (Apache httpd).
>> After quite a few discussions, I think this should be the only mode
available for URI handling, as the two others are broken.
>>
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Why?
Let's stop a bit and test things before.
Jean-Frédéric proposes implementing the same behavior as mod_proxy, so I
don't see how this can be a bad thing.
First of all I didn't said it's a bad thing or anything like that.
We ne
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have noted that nothing has happened in tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk3.
Nearly 2 months without real road map nor clear specifications, what is
wrong?
I don't think anything is wrong. We are waiting for the list of
requirements, and any suggestion from yours or anyb
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Jun 26 05:28:00 2007
New Revision: 550789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=550789
Log:
Do not pass session id if it is zero length. For now only log those
attempts. We should consider re
jean-frederic clere wrote:
/* We checked for space !! */
-strncpy((char *)msg->buf + msg->len, param, len + 1); /*
including \0 */
+memcpy(msg->buf + msg->len, param, len + 1); /* including \0 */
Why do you remove the (char *)?
Cause memcpy uses void* so no need for cas
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
Actually the following was happening: the LB sends requests and gets the
session sticky, continuously sending the upcoming requests to the same
cluster node. At the certain period of time the JVM started the major
garbage collection (full gc) and spent, mentioned above, 20
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
Actually the following was happening: the LB sends requests and gets the
session sticky, continuously sending the upcoming requests to the same
cluster node. At the certain period of time the JVM started the major
garbage collection (full gc) and spent, mentioned above, 20
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
You have oxymoron here. With session stickiness you are willingly
tear down the load balancer correctness because you don't wish/can
have session replication.
Generally you are right, but the ideal world is not the reality:
we use apache my faces implementation of jsf where t
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
The examples (servlet and JSP) have caused a list of security issues.
I think we should remove them from the Tomcat binary packages (6.0 and
5.x at least).
Any comments?
If the examples are broken, then we have serious problems,
either with examples or with th
Joe Nathan wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you want a 100% Java PHP engine or just a simple native to Java bridge
?
I mean PHP scripts are processed as JSP are handled inside Tomcat
without installing any other things as built-in features. Imagine if
Tomcat can handle JSP, PHP, even ASP scrip
+1
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
we had exactly 10 downloads of our quality check tarball since the
announcement yesterday. Three of the testers reported back positively
(one of them via direct mail), no reports were negative. Since I
received already a lot of positive feedback from the preceding
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.24 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Regards,
Mladen
--
Hi,
We have a problem with 1.2.24 that luckily is not security leak,
but it is security related.
The problem is that 401 from Tomcat without body
(a standard HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED) is treated as 401, meaning
that Apache is returning 401 page instead passing 401
to the client.
I already patched the
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I don't full yunderstand this fix. From your other mail i though it's a
regression, but the code in this region is the same at least since
1.2.18 (more than a year). So I have the impression, that this is not a
regression.
You can try 1.2.23 (it works). 1.2.24
Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, I'll go into it. I think I would propose a slightly different patch,
but I'll investigate, why 23 and 24 are different.
The reason why I started to pose querstions is, that I found it a little
strange to make an exception for exactly one status code.
My impression is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Aug 2 05:10:48 2007
New Revision: 562090
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=562090
Log:
Revert the quickfix r562022. It looks like we found the real problem
with r562085.
Perfect. The fix makes login working once again.
Regards,
M
although it doesn't
use it. More generally, we need to check which way we should use shm for
nsapi on which platform. I think the nsapi and general platforms
considerations should not be done before 1.2.25, but everything else
looks OK to me.
Regards,
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTE
Rainer Jung wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.25 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 29 18:14:11 2007
New Revision: 571006
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571006&view=rev
Log:
Remove source for mod_proxy_ajp that moved to httpd some time ago.
Why the hell did you do that?
You could copy it to some sandbox or something
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
You could copy it to some sandbox or something, since there is
lots of usable code in there like console mode httpd API client
for testing modules, etc.
It's trivial to
svn cp -r 571005 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trun
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Match header names exactly against pre defined constants.
p += 6;
-if (memcmp(p, "CHARSET", 7) == 0)
+if (strcmp(p, "CHARSET") == 0)
Someone would say that this is over engineering :)
memcmp *is always* faster
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Match header names exactly against pre defined constants.
p += 6;
-if (memcmp(p, "CHARSET", 7) == 0)
+if (strcmp(p, "CHARSET") == 0)
Someone would say that this
Rainer Jung wrote:
No problem, better safe than sorry.
Right. It seems I always forget the ingenuity of the users
that wish to extent the http spec :)
However, I think that we can still use the memcmp
with "xxx\0". That would still be faster then figuring out the EOL with strcmp?
Regards,
Ml
Rainer Jung wrote:
But the header could be shorter than the constant string. So there was a
second problem with the old code, we eventually compared potentially
uninitialized memory to string constants. Strictly speaking the result
was not defined.
Sorry, but you get that wrong. At the be
Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes Mladen, I know. But we never really use len :) I know, that we can
do it with memcmp, but then you, me or someone else has to add a couple
of if(len>=...) before each memcmp(). Go ahead if you like to.
Look, we have a local header[16] on which we copy toupper, and th
Rainer Jung wrote:
+/* Always do memcmp including the final \0-termination character.
+ */
switch (header[0]) {
case 'A':
-if (memcmp(p, "CCEPT", 5) == 0) {
+if (memcmp(p, "CCEPT", 6) == 0) {
Right, but like said this should be a
>if (m
Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
Following on from my previous over eager attempt to clean up the
duplicate code in connectors I would like to propose the following
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/CHANGES
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/proxy
- move connectors/trunk/ajp/ajplib to connectors/trunk/ajplib
Tho
ose of the current code
inside Tomcat 6 trunk, and the majority of developers have agreed
to put the trunk into the sandbox.
Community
-
After last quarter's new committers and PMC members, there were no
changes the committership nor PMC membership this time.
Mladen Turk was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Sep 2 15:50:40 2007
New Revision: 572181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572181&view=rev
Log:
- Document return codes of the service() method for
all worker types (lb still missing).
Below is for jk_ajp_common.c:
- Document return codes o
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I'm fine with rolling back and committing in steps.
No need to do that. Let's just take more care in the future.
It'll be much easier to follow the commits thought.
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscr
Mark Thomas wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I propose we create connectors/sanbox and move the
trunk/ajp/* code in there.
ajp/proxy code can be removed of course.
Could we just move it to tomcat/sandbox as that already exists?
We need connectors/sandbox anyway, so IMHO it's a good
initial r
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ?
It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant.
We had CTR policy till now and it was working.
Now we have a new situation with different developers POVs,
and cause of that, this requir
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 9/6/07, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do we need it? Yes, if we wish to survive as a project.
It's pain in the ass, I know, but IMHO it's also the only
way to get some sense in this chaos.
I disagree. I think the current CTR policy has
Remy Maucherat wrote:
To give an idea, "tis" could mean:
- API changing patches (any protected or above signature change)
- code changes in the critical path (for example, code which gets
executed on each HTTP request)
Fine.
- any other commit for which a committer asks for the RTC procedure
Beat Fluri wrote:
Hi,
As a member of the Software Engineering group of the University Zurich,
Switzerland, I'm investigating the evolution of software systems. For
this, I'd like to use Tomcat as a case study. Unfortunately, our tools
are limited to CVS and not yet fully adapted to Subversion
Bill Barker wrote:
Now, I'd prefer that TC is just the Servlet/JSP container
that it is meant to be, and not try to add on proprietary features. But
that is just me ;).
You are not the only one ;)
Seems we have lost the clear vision of the project somewhere
in the flame wars.
It has beco
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
This simply has to stop.
taking trunk away, this turn of events is expected. I wish everyone
would have thought of that before we got caught up in the personal, and
not what is important, trunk debate.
I did, as well others did (I hope
+1 as well.
Seems we have come to some sort of conclusion.
(At least the proposal holds the majority of votes)
I'll left this tread for a day or two and then create
an official proposal draft we can vote on.
If thats accepted, I'll create needed documents like
STATUS, ROADMAP containing that draf
Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1. Yes, the above works and addresses my concerns
as well as the problems which started this whole
thing.
[ ] 0. Whatever.
[ ] -1. The above does not work for the following reasons:
If voted (and it looks it will) we should put them s
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hey folks,
as you provide the bindings to the JSSE, even though you don't
ship the JSSE .jars - we still need Tomcat in compliance with the
federal export notification policies. I know you did some work on
this in the past, but please see
http://www.apache.org/dev/c
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
it's sort of a closed loop problem. Update the info, allow the usual
one hour after updating from minotaur to sync, and then shoot out the
notice referencing the list of notices sent :)
Can we get an example email that needs to be send and an email
address? The pa
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
it's sort of a closed loop problem. Update the info, allow the usual
one hour after updating from minotaur to sync, and then shoot out the
notice referencing the list of notices sent :)
Can we get an example
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
(I've heard this list is a good place to discuss mod_jk code; please
redirect me and accept my apologies if it is not.)
No, this is correct place :)
containers. By adding some additional instrumentation to the code, I
can see that each AJP packet is constructed with
Henri Gomez wrote:
Here is the dump
You should know by now that apache mailing doesn't
allow large attachments, zip files, etc... :)
Put a link somewhere
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addit
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a
bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Your patch won't work.
The real problem is in the initialization for vhosts where
when there is *any* Jk directive the create_jk_config is ca
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a
bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Right, this is bug indeed.
If there is no Jk... directives the vhost conf is wrongly
configured (seems that merge_jk_config is not evaluated)
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
be careful:
OK :)
I also added an option JkMountCopyAll,
OK, but clone is called when there is no "JkMountCopy All" defined
if (sconf && sconf->was_initialized == JK_TRUE && jk_mount_copy_all ==
JK_FALSE) {
clone_jk_config
So if there is *no* module direct
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
clone_jk_config is bogus, and doesn't behave like it should
(copy only the basic data and no mounts)
Was this function introduced since 1.2.25?
Yes, I was talking about trunk not 1.2.25
Regards,
Mladen
---
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Thumbs up for Linux, win32 and win64!
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Nov 11 11:22:23 2007
New Revision: 593943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593943&view=rev
Log:
Undo revision 593927.
This produced a mem leak for vhosts with private JkMounts.
No idea why.
Because uw_map is now allocated *only* if uri_to_
Rainer Jung wrote:
P.S.: I hope the other changes are fine with you?
They look OK, but I'll double check, just in case ;)
Cheers,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for the
log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the line
number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like wrong
compiler optimization or so?
Yes, that
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for
the log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the
line number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like
wrong compiler op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Tue Nov 20 09:29:26 2007
New Revision: 596747
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=596747&view=rev
Log:
Add comments to explain timestamp formatting for sub seconds resolution.
Furthermore increased the accepted format length a bit.
Before we accept
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java?rev=596761&r1=596760&r2=596761&view=diff
=
RafaQuiM wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems using the TomcatMonitor (tomcat4w.exe) when trying to
access a WinXp net file from a Servlet due to the console uses the SYTEM
user (user.name property) as credentials.
Does anybody know how to configure tomcatMonitor in order to use the logged
user?
jean-frederic clere wrote:
JBPAPP-366 is http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=589062&view=rev that was
a bug in the JAVA part not in mod_jk.
Right, however the idea to call the Socket.shutdown in a separate
thread is very good since it's blocking call.
The only problem is how to close bunch of th
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
One of the tasks we put out for the Google Highly Open Participation
contest (http://code.google.com/opensource/ghop/2007-8/) is Tim's
idea, to move our FAQ from static files to the wiki.
A student, Gianluca Varisco, is taking on that task. He has just started work.
Th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 30 02:26:42 2007
New Revision: 599767
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=599767&view=rev
Log:
Complete half-baked r599743. Care about signedness
and apply reverse order to the relevant loop to.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/nati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Fri Nov 30 00:52:17 2007
New Revision: 599743
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=599743&view=rev
Log:
Maintain idle connections in decreasing (LRU) slot order.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/common/jk_ajp_common.c
tomcat/conne
Sergey Vidyuk wrote:
Hi Tomcat Developers!
I'm contributor in the Apache Software Foundation's GHOP Contest and
working on issue
19(http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-asf/issues/detail?id=19)
Excellent!
I've plan to write scripts that generate tomcat dependency for jar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
Add function description comments and
switch return values of jk_is_socket_connected()
from 0/1 to JK_FALSE/JK_TRUE.
-return nr == 0 ? 0 : 1;
+return nr == JK_FALSE ? JK_FALSE : JK_TRUE;
int nr;
if (ioctl(sock, FIONREAD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Dec 12 07:10:32 2007
New Revision: 603637
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=603637&view=rev
Log:
Slightly rearange ajp_next_connection().
int rc;
ajp_worker_t *aw = ae->worker;
-jk_sock_t sock;
+/* Close previous socket
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hmm, I'm almost sure this is wrong.
It makes race condition in threaded servers.
shutdown is blocking call.
Any particular reason why you changed that?
The shutdown is done on the socket belonging to the endpoint, so it is
not in concurrent use (the endpoint got it's socket
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
int ajp_connect_to_endpoint(ajp_endpoint_t * ae, jk_logger_t *l)
{
@@ -841,7 +861,7 @@
if (!IS_VALID_SOCKET(ae->sd)) {
ae->last_errno = errno;
-jk_log(l, JK_LOG_INFO,
+jk_log(l, JK_LOG_ERROR,
"Failed opening
Rainer Jung wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.26 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Regards,
Mladen
-
Tim Whittington wrote:
Binary builds of 1.2.26 for various platforms are available now from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/timsjk/
These include builds of a patched IIS 5/6 ISAPI Redirector that support
HTTP 1.1 chunked encoding (and thus keep-alives on dynamic content).
Hi Tim,
Can you crea
Rainer Jung wrote:
Just in case there's any synergy between them: related to chunked
encoding for IIS there are two BZ entries/patches:
Yes, I'm aware of all the history ;)
I still think this is too huge change for 1.2 code base,
but if done via conditional compile, it might be a good
foundati
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=608842&view=rev
Log:
Correct syntax of linker flag for gcc.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/build/tcnative.m4
*linux*)
-TCN_OPENSSL_LIBS="-L$use_openssl/lib --Wl,-rpath,$use_openssl/lib
Rainer Jung wrote:
And those three are all correct and equivalent:
-Wl,-rpath,
-Wl,--rpath,
-Wl,--rpath -Wl,
Ok, so -Wl,-rpath, it is. Cool :)
Cheers,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
Hi,
Beyond the fact that org.apache.jk.* provides a generator for
the mod_jk.conf, is there any reason to have that connector
in parallel with org.apache.coyote.ajp.*
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I don't have any preference either way, since we are pretty few active
folks at the moment, the less code is usually better
My plan was not to do that (org.apache.jk is not that huge) and keep
people happy.
Nevertheless, the Apache/IIS
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Hi Malden,
Must be tcnative at tomcat60 not an external svn link?
I would like that we have the subset of connectors/jni
inside tc6/native (only the parts that are used).
The probable version will be 2.x while the version
in connectors/jni will stay as 1.x for tc 5.5.x
Hi,
With Native connector if the OS supports IPV6 the
default address (null) is translated to "::", thus
it only listens to the IPV6 addresses. In case the
OS doesn't support IPV6 (hardly to be found nowadays), the
null address is equivalent to the address="0.0.0.0".
The same is for any Java conn
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
BTW: why is this situation special wrt the native connector?
Right, but that's not the case for all supported OS-es.
Windows for sure (and Solaris I think) will refuse
127.0.0.1 when the address="::"
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Comments?
As you say, 0.0.0.0 is ipv4 so it looks like a bad default value to me,
while null means whatever the connector wants. Internally, it's up to
the native layer to figure it out, I think.
Sure, but the fact is that Java connectors will always
use IPV4. APR c
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Fri Nov 10 06:23:52 2006
New Revision: 473346
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473346
Log:
Add version control flags like in 5.5
No, it's to be added when building only, according to what the user is
building.
Sven Köhler wrote:
Hi,
i see, you're developing Tomcat 6.0.
Will Tomcat 6.0 send flush packets, when the flush()-method of the
OutputStreams or the Writers are called?
Yes. It's done in a way that is backward compatible.
When out.flush() is called an empty data packet is sent.
It's somethi
Sven Köhler wrote:
i see, you're developing Tomcat 6.0.
Will Tomcat 6.0 send flush packets, when the flush()-method of the
OutputStreams or the Writers are called?
Yes. It's done in a way that is backward compatible.
When out.flush() is called an empty data packet is sent.
Did it really need
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page.
+1
--
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guys - something got broken again in your release process against ASF policy...
I don't see three +1's for any of the recent postings to your downloads page.
Nothing got broken.
Tomcat is probably one of the latest remaining projects
where the developers and PMC st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=476817
-if (ae->worker->socket_timeout > 0) {
-if (!jk_is_socket_connected(ae->sd)) {
+if (!jk_is_socket_connected(ae->sd)) {
+1. That's possible because socket connect detection
is not dependen
Rainer Jung wrote:
If you think you can do that in a simple way, then fine.
But if it would require a lots of changes, then I think
we should go with the more powerful solution as part
of 1.3 branch, by using shared memory, web interface, etc.
I just don't think that this is so important if yo
Rainer Jung wrote:
E.g. if one empties the uriworkermap.properties, reloading it does not
change the internal mount list. Temporarily adding and later removing an
entry will not remove the entry.
That's the entire point.
But this is not what a user expects from a change in a list.
I know, bu
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I suggest to tag mod_jk 1.2.20 next weekend. There are a couple of
additions to the status worker, and only small changes concerning the
apache integration (env vars, JkOptions and virtual hosts) coming from
me in the next days, but I would be ready to tag around saturd
Rainer Jung wrote:
For those who want to test: I committed far the most part of what I
planned to improve.
Thanks Rainer, the patches you made are really great!
I think we'll have a best ever mod_jk.
However I still have doubts about you patch:
> @@ -1219,8 +1219,8 @@
> jk_log(l,
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
very nice idea making things easier for users. I like it. But dots are
standard separation characters in host names and host names might not be
totally uncommon as jvm routes. I know, that they can be symbolic, but
we might break configs or deny using such a simple
101 - 200 of 1263 matches
Mail list logo
