On 03/08/2012 12:59 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.03.2012 12:06, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:21 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 08.03.2012 09:08, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/08/2012 09:02 AM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Mar 8 08:02:45 2012
New Revision: 1298288
URL: http
On 03/08/2012 01:15 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/3/8:
Added:
tomcat/jk/trunk/native/iis/pcre/chartables.hw
The added file seems to be a C source text, so it needs svn:eol-style=native
Probably, but since its not meant to be editable its irrelevant.
It'll be compiled regardless of
Release candidate artefacts [1] based on tag [2] are ready for vote.
The vote will stay open for at least 72 hours.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.33 release candidate is
[+1] Stable, release
[-1] Do not release because of ...
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/jk/tags/JK_1_2_33
[2
On 03/12/2012 02:08 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Hello Tomcat developers,
Advantages:
- Easier to maintain. I have looked a bit at the ISAPI code, and as it is C++
code, it is probably somewhat hard to maintain. As I said, for this connector
(in the current stage) I only spend one day to rea
On 03/12/2012 09:07 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I add to add --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs to configure line :
CFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64' APXSLDFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64'
./configure --with-apr=/usr --with-ssl=/usr
--with-java-home=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/
--wit
On 03/12/2012 09:07 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I add to add --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs to configure line :
CFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64' APXSLDFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64'
./configure --with-apr=/usr --with-ssl=/usr
--with-java-home=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/
--wit
On 03/12/2012 10:18 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/12/2012 09:07 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I add to add --with-apxs=/usr/sbin/apxs to configure line :
CFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64' APXSLDFLAGS='-arch i386 -arch x86_64'
./configure --with-apr=/usr --with-ssl=/usr
--with-java-
On 03/12/2012 07:51 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Now imagine that a Client with a very slow connection requests a file from
Tomcat which is very big. IIS would create a SPDY stream over an existing TCP
connection to start retrieving the file. However, When the stream is
established and Tomca
On 03/09/2012 01:00 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Release candidate artefacts [1] based on tag [2] are ready for vote.
The vote will stay open for at least 72 hours.
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.33 release candidate is
[+1] Stable, release
[-1] Do not release because of ...
+1 (just for the record
With 3 binding +1 votes (Henri, Mladen and Rainer) and no other votes
I declare this vote as passed.
Will copy the artefacts to dist and create ANN after 24 hrs for mirror sync.
On 03/09/2012 01:00 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Release candidate artefacts [1] based on tag [2] are ready for vote.
The
On 03/14/2012 09:14 AM, Tim Whittington wrote:
I see 1.2.33 ended up in the root of the /jk directory...
Yeah, same as previous version.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additio
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release
of version 1.2.33 of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This release includes both bug fixes and new features compared
to version 1.2.32. Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http
On 03/17/2012 10:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.03.2012 21:00, mt...@apache.org wrote:
jk_request_conf_t *rconf = ap_get_module_config(r->request_config,&jk_module);
if (rconf == NULL) {
- jk_request_conf_t *rconf = apr_palloc(r->pool, sizeof(jk_request_conf_t));
+ rconf = apr_palloc(r->pool,
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression
and few long lasting bugs fixed.
I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk
since I concentrated mainly on IIS.
BTW, should we remove/revoke 1.2.33 or just go with 1.2.34?
IMHO 1.2.33 is unusable, so that's a valid
On 03/19/2012 03:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/03/2012 14:55, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/03/2012 14:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.34 tomorrow cause we have one regression
and few long lasting bugs fixed.
I'd appreciate if you can check the httpd builds from trunk
si
On 03/19/2012 04:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Do you have any template for that?
Sorry no. Maybe something like:
Send...
Thanks
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
Hi,
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.34 release candidate is ready
for vote at [1]. This version solves regression(s) found in
released version 1.2.33 and one long lasting IIS shared memory
synchronization bug.
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.34 is
On 03/22/2012 11:43 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.03.2012 09:49, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
+0.
Observed problem: due to a typo in the config file (wrong name of jk status
worker in a JkMount) the web server crashed during startup.
The fix was trivial.
IMHO the entire extension_uri code is
On 03/22/2012 11:43 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.03.2012 09:49, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
- strange JK_REVISION, just "()". When I run the release script, the real svn
revision is put into the variable. The value goes into the full exposed version. It was
only introduced a few versio
[1] http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.2.34/
Withdrawn because of crash in case of config typo.
That's not acceptable.
Will tag 1.2.35 later today.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.
Due to one bug that can crash httpd in case someone
has typo in JkMount directive, 1.2.34 was cancelled and
here is 1.2.35.
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.35 is
[ ] Stable, go ahead and release
[ ] Broken because of ...
[1] http://people.a
On 03/22/2012 02:46 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.35 is
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
[ ] Broken because of ...
My vote.
Since we already gathered enough votes for 1.2.34
and this version only fixes user config
With 4 binding +1 votes (Filip, Christopher, Henri and Mladen)
and no other votes, I declare this vote as passed.
I'll copy the artefacts over the weekend and post ANN on Monday
by which time mirrors should sync.
On 03/22/2012 02:46 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Due to one bug that can crash
On 03/25/2012 04:00 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305020&view=rev
LOL. Are you waiting for a release to carry the bad news :)
Anyhow, don't care much 'bout 1.3
We should probably drop further support for something
abandoned long time ago.
Cheers
--
^TM
-
On 03/25/2012 08:15 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 25.03.2012 20:05, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/25/2012 04:00 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Fixed by http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1305020&view=rev
I went through the change logs of the last three years and only very few
changes were missing, of w
Hi,
I build our courtesy windows binaries against httpd-2.4.1-dev
which has a different MMN then 2.4.1 thus refusing to load.
(other binaries are file)
I have removed the tomcat-connectors-1.2.35-windows-i386-http-2.4.x.*
file from dist site and new one are at:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/to
On 03/25/2012 11:00 PM, Le Huy wrote:
Hi
I am facing problem in using jkstatus to update subworker lb_factor,
it seems that after changing it, the mod_jk balancer does not change
anything
Looking at source code in trunk, I think that there is bug , I
include herewith the 2 changes that I think
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.35
of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This version fixes few bugs found in 1.2.33 release.
Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
On 03/26/2012 05:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.03.2012 13:03, Mladen Turk wrote:
Shouldn't it have been:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/jk/trunk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c?r1=1305020&r2=1302445
Yeah, couldn't put that into .xml cause ampersand breaks the build,
and a
> cd /x1/www/tomcat.apache.org
> svn up
svn: Failed to add directory 'maven-plugin-2.0-beta-1': an unversioned
directory of the same name already exists
Can someone remove that dir who added it to site's svn ?
Regards
--
^TM
On 03/26/2012 05:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/3/26 Mladen Turk:
cd /x1/www/tomcat.apache.org
svn up
svn: Failed to add directory 'maven-plugin-2.0-beta-1': an unversioned
directory of the same name already exists
Can someone remove that dir who added it to site's svn ?
On 03/26/2012 06:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.03.2012 17:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
Feel free to modify the index.xml and update the url.
Done in r1305416.
Lokks like we both are "svn up" the site on p.a.o nearly in parallel during the
last minutes. Will log out now.
Yeah, I
On 03/26/2012 07:00 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.03.2012 18:15, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 03/26/2012 06:10 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.03.2012 17:16, Mladen Turk wrote:
Lokks like we both are "svn up" the site on p.a.o nearly in parallel
during the last minutes. Will log out now.
On 03/26/2012 07:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 26.03.2012 19:03, Mladen Turk wrote:
This is one of the most annoying releases I had for years.
It just refuses to go out :)
There's a German saying:
The most difficult births often bring the most beautiful children.
I know you Germans h
On 03/26/2012 11:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
for (i = 0; i< p->num_of_workers; i++) {
lb_sub_worker_t *w =&p->lb_workers[i];
- if (w->sequence != w->s->h.sequence) {
+ if (w->sequence< w->s->h.sequence) {
I think this one is wrong. It is inside push not pull, so it should be if (loc
On 03/26/2012 11:46 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
for (i = 0; i< p->num_of_workers; i++) {
lb_sub_worker_t *w =&p->lb_workers[i];
- if (w->sequence != w->s->h.sequence) {
+ if (w->sequence< w->s->h.sequence) {
I think this one is wrong. It is inside push not pull, so it should be if (loc
Just wanted to note the problems we have with shared memory ...
Currently we presume that 'someone' will initialize the shared
memory and setup all struct data before the first request.
This is wrong presumption, cause shared memory on IIS is
initialized on first request, and with multiple work
On 03/28/2012 02:01 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
What about a look on file that contains the id? It gets created and lock by the
first worker that needs the shared memory and writes the id inside and unlock
the file? Other workers will just read the id in the file.
I started to work on 'ge
+1
Signatures and generic content OK
On 03/26/2012 07:01 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
The proposed 3 release of Apache Taglibs Parent POM is now available for voting.
Please vote on whether Apache Taglibs Parent 3 should be:
[+1] Released, or
[-1] Not released because ...
Regards
--
^TM
--
On 03/30/2012 10:16 PM, Le Huy wrote:
Have you look at how mod_proxy solves this issue, it seems that it
does not suffer the problem that we are experiencing , and also does
not need any share memory file.
... it uses shared memory (scoreboard in 2.0 and 2.2, mod_slotmem in 2.4)
... and it suck
On 05/05/2012 03:39 PM, Guilherme Vanz wrote:
Unregister
Unregister you too :)
Are you just annoying or darn stupid.
Each message you receive from any of the ASF mailing
lists has a clear instructions how to unsubscribe.
Should be much easier then the effort you took while
subscribing at the
Hi,
I plan to tag 1.2.36 (as promised after finishing shm rewrite).
There is one nasty bug in windows status worker and sharing
actually doesn't work in 1.2.35, so a couple of very good
reasons for a quick release.
Comments?
Regards
--
^TM
-
Hi
Did some testing and removing unlockAccept works equally
fine (and in some circumstances pause/continue and even shutdown is much
faster).
Using a simple socket close on stop/destroy and monitoring
for pause 'after' acceptSocket() by not handling single
connection received after pause elimina
On 05/07/2012 08:48 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I'm not entirely clear on what you are proposing. Can you provide a
proposed patch for this?
Sure.
Need to port that to trunk and new AbstractEndpoint.
Attached is a patch for something similar to tomcat7 :)
just to get an idea.
AFAICT this is not
On 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
By 'unlockAccept' you mean the socket connection made to the acceptor to
force the accept() to unblock ? How are you getting the socket accept() to
return, my understanding was that close() or thread interrupt don't work in
all cases/VMs.
Well, m
On 05/08/2012 01:13 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/07/2012 11:05 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
By 'unlockAccept' you mean the socket connection made to the acceptor to
force the accept() to unblock ? How are you getting the soc
On 05/08/2012 08:34 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
For real pause (stop accepting connections and wait till all sessions
times out) this can be done safely by setting 10 second timeout
on listening socket. It means that in worse case we would
On 05/08/2012 12:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The only downside I can see is if someone wants zero backlog on
pause. That is no longer going to be possible.
According to javadocs setting socket's backlog to zero means 'OS default'
so this is not reliable anyhow.
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 05/08/2012 07:09 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
IMHO neither 'graceful shutdown' nor 'deploy' are best served by not
accepting connections:
- for 'graceful' - a number of connections will get to backlog and timeout,
Not sure if ServerSocket.close() would cause cascade close of all
accepted sock
On 05/08/2012 08:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/05/2012 19:47, Costin Manolache wrote:
You may still want to accept requests for existing sessions.
Both 'graceful shutdown' and app deploy are important cases - it's just
that current 'pause()' is not that good for either of them, if you really
Hi,
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.36 release candidate is ready
for vote at [1]. This version solves shared memorz regression(s)
found in released version 1.2.35 and allows )again= compiling
against old httpd 1.3.x.
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1
On 05/09/2012 04:25 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.36 is
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
[ ] Broken because of ...
Just FTR.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.2.36/
Regards
--
^TM
With 3 +1 binding votes (Filip, Rainer, Mladen)
this vote has been passed.
I'll copy the files to dist, and create ANN in 24hrs.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.2.36/
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubs
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.36
of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This version fixes few bugs found in 1.2.35 release.
Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
Crap.
Not only late, but with the wrong @subject.
Well, hope people will figure that out.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.36
of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This version fixes few bugs found in 1.2.35 release.
Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
On 05/17/2012 09:21 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2012 05:22, Mladen Turk wrote:
Crap.
Not only late, but with the wrong @subject.
Well, hope people will figure that out.
I haven't moderated the mail to announce@t.a.o through. If you want to
resend that with the correct subject yo
On 05/20/2012 08:37 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Therefore, I intend modifying the APR/native code to support per socket
time outs. I would be grateful if those of you with more C knowledge
than I (which is most people on this list) could:
a) tell me now if this is a crazy idea (and why)
b) keep an ext
On 05/21/2012 02:55 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/05/2012 21:47, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/20/2012 08:37 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Therefore, I intend modifying the APR/native code to support per socket
time outs. I would be grateful if those of you with more C knowledge
than I (which is most
On 05/21/2012 02:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I am trying to build the 1.1.x native connector from trunk so I can test
the changes I plan to make to support per socket time outs. I can build
using dynamic linking but not statically. What tool chain are folks
currently using to build the native conne
On 05/21/2012 08:01 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
My point was that you don't need to change anything in native.
Leave APR as it is - just use '0' as timeout for the websocket sockets ( or
any scoket that needs arbitrary timeout ). That will
On 05/21/2012 04:28 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Any plan to do a release out of trunk (1.2 ) ?
interrupt() and the others seem useful.
Yeah. plan to do this as soon as Mark finishes its
pollset changes.
Since apr 1.4.x was released for quite a while think we are safe.
Regards
--
^TM
--
On 05/23/2012 10:07 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
-apr_time_t*socket_ttl;
-apr_interval_time_t max_ttl;
+apr_time_t*socket_last_active;
+apr_interval_time_t default_timeout;
Think we should move both socket_last_active and socket_timeout
to tcn_socket_t. They
On 05/24/2012 04:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/05/2012 05:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/23/2012 10:07 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
-apr_time_t*socket_ttl;
-apr_interval_time_t max_ttl;
+apr_time_t*socket_last_active;
+apr_interval_time_t default_timeout
On 05/24/2012 05:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/24/2012 04:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 24/05/2012 05:19, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 05/23/2012 10:07 PM, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
- apr_time_t *socket_ttl;
- apr_interval_time_t max_ttl;
+ apr_time_t *socket_last_active
On 05/24/2012 06:09 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
I wonder if anyone can remember some similar change that may, in certain
cases, blank-out the server's IP address for mod_jk's workers.
The only thing that can cause that could be shared memory
which has been heavily changed. If worker s
On 05/28/2012 12:42 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/5/27:
-aw->s->addr_sequence = aw->addr_sequence;
+aw->addr_sequence = aw->s->h.sequence;
The above line, was it supposed to be
aw->addr_sequence = aw->s->addr_sequence;
Yeah. Fixed. Thanks :)
Cheers
--
^TM
Hi,
We have regression in 1.2.36 which can cause core in case
workers are mixed between balance_members and worker.list thus
I plan to create a speedy release focusing on this issue.
Hope that's fine with everyone.
Regards
--
^TM
Hi,
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.37 release candidate is ready
for vote at [1]. This version solves regression(s)
found in released version 1.2.36 which can crash web server
if configured in certain way.
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.37 is
[
On 05/29/2012 11:23 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.37 is
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
[ ] Broken because of ...
... for the record.
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
With 3 +1 binding votes from Filip, Christopher and Mladen
I declare this vote as passed.
I'll copy the artefacts to dist site and create ANN after
mirror sync window.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat-connectors/jk-1.2.37/
Regards
--
^TM
--
On 05/31/2012 01:24 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu May 31 11:24:18 2012
New Revision: 678
Log:
Upload 1.2.37 artefacts
Modified:
release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/README.html
release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/README.html
???
What happened t
On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/5/31 Mladen Turk:
On 05/31/2012 01:24 PM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Thu May 31 11:24:18 2012
New Revision: 678
Log:
Upload 1.2.37 artefacts
Modified:
release/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/README.html
release
The Apache Tomcat Project is proud to announce the release of version 1.2.37
of Apache Tomcat Connectors.
This version fixes few bugs found in 1.2.36 release.
Full details of these changes and new features,
are available in the Apache Tomcat Connectors changelog:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connecto
On 06/09/2012 10:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Mladen, what are the chances of you starting a native 1.2.24 release in
the next few days?
Sure. Need to double check few things, but Monday or Tuesday we should
have RC.
Regards
--
^TM
---
On 06/10/2012 05:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 10/06/2012 16:09, Mladen Turk wrote:
Sure. Need to double check few things, but Monday or Tuesday we should
have RC.
Excellent. Thanks.
Could you check binaries from
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/tomcat/
If they are OK, I'll T&
On 06/11/2012 11:58 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 11/06/2012 10:56, mt...@apache.org wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Jun 11 09:56:31 2012
New Revision: 1348780
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1348780&view=rev
Log:
Update openssl version and patch
Modified:
tomcat/native/branches/1.1.x/na
Version 1.1.24 is feature-add release containing additional
API to set per-socket timeouts inside Poller.
The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
and the build was done using tag [2].
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.24 is
[ ] Stable, go
On 06/12/2012 03:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I implemented those for Solaris long ago and thought they existed for
Linux from the beginning. But in fact for Linux there are only memory
Thanks for such a thorough review!
Could you add some of your thoughts into trunk's README
Just add
TODO
On 06/11/2012 02:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
The VOTE will remain open for at least 48 hours.
The Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.24 is
[X] Stable, go ahead and release
[ ] Broken because of ...
Cast my vote.
Regards
--
^TM
On 06/12/2012 06:53 PM, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
Over 2 months since last release
Got some critical fixes that I would like to see released
- max connections broken
- send file in nio broken
- jdbc pool can hang during DB failure
Sure, we need native 1.1.24 for Mark's WebSocke
On 06/13/2012 10:29 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
While building it on OSX, I noticed some changes, ie no more apxs in
configure.
May be I was using an old build system ?
Probably not, since we never had apxs with tomcat native.
You were probably thinking on mod_jk, since apxs is for
building httpd m
With 5 binding +1 votes from Mark, Filip, Rainer,
Jean-Frederic and Mladen, and no other votes I declare this vote
as passed.
I'll copy the artefacts to dist site and create ANN after
mirror sync.
On 06/11/2012 02:54 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
[1] http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/1
On 06/13/2012 05:09 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
+1 from me also (build and tested on OSX Lion).
Question, did you need binaries for OSX ?
Volunteer as maintainer for consecutive versions?
Sure, create .zip files with the content similar to windows,
and put them in your people's dir, and call for
On 06/13/2012 06:09 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
+1 from me also (build and tested on OSX Lion).
Suppose you'll be doing universal builds, so the .zip should
be tomcat-connectors-1.1.24-macosx-universal-bin.zip with LICENSE,
NOTICE, README and .dylib of course ;)
I could provide .pkg or better .dm
On 06/13/2012 10:02 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Which make me think that PKG or DMG for Tomcat would be great.
Make sure all those .dmg's can be created with average 'developer'
from our SVN.
Think this can be scripted given the prerequisites are installed.
Regards
--
^TM
-
On 06/14/2012 03:07 PM, kkoli...@apache.org wrote:
Author: kkolinko
Date: Thu Jun 14 13:07:27 2012
New Revision: 1350222
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1350222&view=rev
Log:
Correct typos in release announcement
Thanks.
Add old announcement to oldnews
Why have you bring back the ol
On 06/14/2012 03:28 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
+
+Some info on that: "The JNI functions take a jbyte*, which is a signed char*
+on my Solaris system. Whereas the iovec iov_base is a caddr_t, which is a
char*."
+
... and this is what? the same.
I'm always amazed how compilers are generally stu
On 06/14/2012 03:37 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Jun 14 13:37:43 2012
New Revision: 1350235
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1350235&view=rev
Log:
Revoke proposal.
I actually think we should stop shipping KEYS with archives.
Anyone can create fake .zip with fake KE
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.24 stable.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Thank you,
--
The A
On 06/14/2012 04:42 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/6/14 Mark Thomas :
On 14/06/2012 15:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
I just had a problem with running "svn up" on tomcat.a.o.
I found a solution, but I wonder whether others will experience the same issue.
They will. Well, they would h
On 06/15/2012 11:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.28 release is now available for voting.
The proposed 7.0.27 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.28 Stable
BTW, you should have probably change the vote order to stable/broken
+1
On 06/26/2012 10:11 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
and there are some regressions in 7.0.28 that I'd rather fix
sooner than later.
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional comm
On 07/03/2012 01:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 7.0.29 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.29 Stable
- Tested on Linux and Windows
- Signatures OK
Regards
--
^TM
-
To
On 10/16/2012 10:52 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.36/
According to the release process, the 6.0.36 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_36 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[x] Stable
Regards
--
On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 7.0.33 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.33 Stable
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apach
On 11/20/2012 06:25 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
I'm also anxiously awaiting 1.0.11 (specifically the procrun piece) -- albeit
separately from Tomcat.
Originally there was talk of kicking off 1.0.11 this week, but I've not seen
any information about test builds yet.
Patience :)
I'm working on it.
On 11/19/2012 12:34 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.33 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7/v7.0.33/
I tested the .zip version, but when trying .tar.gz
I'm getting the:
$tar zxf apache-tomcat
On 11/21/2012 12:44 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/11/2012 11:38, Rainer Jung wrote:
The pieces were OK, when I downloaded them from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-7 on Monday evening.
It is varies by user agent. Some handle the double compression
correctly. Some don't.
On 11/21/2012 11:53 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
On 11/20/2012 11:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 11/20/2012 06:25 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
I'm also anxiously awaiting 1.0.11 (specifically the procrun piece) -- albeit
separately from Tomcat.
Originally there was talk of kicking off 1.0.11 this week
501 - 600 of 1263 matches
Mail list logo
