+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Thanks for the additional review Konstantin.
ELResolver.convertToType() is public API. It is defined by the specification
and we can't change that.
Your comment about setting setPropertyResolved(false
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to John Engebretson from comment #0)
> context.setPropertyResolved(false);
> ...
>
> context can be of type ELContextImpl, ELContextWrapper, Evalu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #5 from John Engebretson ---
Yep. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #4 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment #3 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Naresh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
*** Bug 68603 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68603
Bug ID: 68603
Summary: Request Context path and Query param gets replaced
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
I did look at using !startsWith("jakarta") but that is ~2x slower than a length
check.
I've coded up the length check and am just running some tests locally.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
*** Bug 68599 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
Bug ID: 68599
Summary: migration tool jakartaee-migration-1.0.7 does not
convert xmlrpc-server-3.1.3.jar
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.18
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68597
Bug ID: 68597
Summary: hannover messe
Product: Tomcat Connectors
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #3 from John Engebretson ---
> This needs some more thought...
Thanks, I'll keep chewing on it too.
> Note: This may get moved to an enhancement if there isn't an obvious way to
> improve this)
Makes sense, thanks.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
#1 isn't an option unfortunately. With more complex EL expressions
ELContext.isPropertyResolved() will return true at the start of the call to
convertToType(). At least one test fails if this code is removed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
--- Comment #8 from John Engebretson ---
Created attachment 39575
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39575=edit
Support class for the speed test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
--- Comment #7 from John Engebretson ---
Created attachment 39574
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39574=edit
Speed test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68089
John Engebretson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68119
--- Comment #3 from John Engebretson ---
This optimization was effective in production and reduced the method cost by
approximately 2/3rds, saving more than 0.5% of cpu.
The remaining time comes from another invokevirtual in the method which
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
--- Comment #1 from John Engebretson ---
Created attachment 39573
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39573=edit
Support class for the speed test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68596
Bug ID: 68596
Summary: Remaining overhead in
javax.el.CompositeELResolver.convertToType
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.85
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68068
--- Comment #5 from John Engebretson ---
Production results confirm a small improvement - greater than zero but not
enormous. Sorry, I'm not able to provide hard numbers because of the huge
number of distinct code paths.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ---
I've been able to look at this some more. Thanks so much for the test case. It
really speeds up the process.
The processing paths for sync and async are distinct. Currently the error
handling in async
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
--- Comment #2 from John Engebretson ---
> Are you sure about the request parameters being parsed multiple times? They
> should only be parsed once per request.
Yes - this appears to be triggered when an extra param is added by a JSP
i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68593
Bug ID: 68593
Summary: Request Context is replaced after restoreRequest()
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67683
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
Are you sure about the request parameters being parsed multiple times? They
should only be parsed once per request.
Is org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.StringCache not caching the Strings or is just
that local
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz ---
How do you get a valid HTTP request (not a 400) but then find yourself in a
"Bad Request" state once async gets started?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #6 from adwsingh ---
I agree on the closing connection part. Its just weird that sync and async
behave differently, one sends out a 400 and other doesn't.
Also the way you suggested in
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
I haven't looked at this yet but I suspect it may end up as WONTFIX.
A bad request indicates a syntactically invalid request. At that point, it can
be argued that given that the request is invalid, Tomcat
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #4 from adwsingh ---
Any update on this? I can give fixing this a shot if no one else is planning
to.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68572
Bug ID: 68572
Summary: migration tool does not conver xmlrpc-server3.0.jar to
be jakarta compliant
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: 10.1.18
Hardware: PC
Status
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
adwsingh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
adwsingh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adwsi...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
--- Comment #1 from adwsingh ---
Also similar to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68228
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68559
Bug ID: 68559
Summary: BadRequestException doesn't send back a 400 when using
Async servlets
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.85
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68558
Bug ID: 68558
Summary: Redundant calls to ByteChunk.toString()
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.81
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68555
Bug ID: 68555
Summary: Errors encountered after upgrading version 7.0.57 to
9.0.14
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.14
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Den changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #2 from Den ---
Mark, I
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
Ok, this sounds reasonable looking at the code.
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/blob/main/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java#L623
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
--- Comment #1 from John Engebretson ---
Sorry, error with the numbering in the last sentence: the attached speed test
shows a big improvement with #1 (right-sizing) but a greater improvement from
either #2 or #3.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68546
Bug ID: 68546
Summary: Performance optimization in
PageContextImpl.getELContext()
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.81
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
No response after a week.
If the requested information is not provided, the issue will be closed as
WORKSFORME.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68533
Bug ID: 68533
Summary: Failed to load resource: net::ERR_HTTP2_PROTOCOL_ERROR
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
--- Comment #1 from kyuubimodero...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 39537
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39537=edit
Logs when debug is enabled
Attached commons-daemon.log file after enabling debug mode (--LogLe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68518
Bug ID: 68518
Summary: Tomcat Windows Service fails when running in OpenJDK
11
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.83
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
SSLContext.getInstance("TLS") is the correct way.
Please go to the users mailing list to investigate.
https://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
Bug ID: 68500
Summary: occur a security vulnerable SSL connection(TLS1.1)
when send a packet for heartbeat in k8s tribes
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.52
Hardware
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #4 from Manak Bisht ---
Somehow, embarrassingly, I missed both those obvious details. Thanks for the
correcting me. I will be more mindful in the future.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
Those are debug messages, not error messages and are expected when running on
Java 21.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Manak Bisht changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Manak Bisht
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68495
Bug ID: 68495
Summary: Unable to find match between the canonical context and
the URI presented by the user agent
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.85
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68493
Bug ID: 68493
Summary: NoSuchMethodException:
java.lang.foreign.MemorySegment.getString(long) is
thrown during the application start using java 21
Product: Tomcat 11
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Remy
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
There are only 5 cipher suites defied in TLSv1.3. Is this really that much of
an optimization?
I suppose it's a bit of a documentation improvement for configuration...
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Hui Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lidot...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68480
Bug ID: 68480
Summary: Add cipher alias for TLSv1.3
Product: Tomcat 10
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Mac OS X 10.1
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
301 - 400 of 46937 matches
Mail list logo
