Mark Thomas wrote:
On behalf of the Tomcat committers I am pleased to announce that Konstantin
Kolinko has been voted in as a new Tomcat committer.
Please join me in welcoming him.
+1 :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
Remy Maucherat wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.20/
According to the release process, the 6.0.20 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Looks OK :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Rémy
Mark Thomas wrote:
After a long discussion on the users the list [1], the question was
asked: Is this feature required?
Diving back into the archives, it appears it was introduced in 3.1.1 as
a backwards compatibility option for Windows users after Tomcat was made
case sensitive on that
On 07/09/2009 06:12 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
prospective and current tomcat users
I have changed the wiki to used this one.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
On 08/10/2009 11:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 08/10/2009 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Http11Processor.java
inputBuffer.parseRequestLine();
request.setStartTime(System.currentTimeMillis());
keptAlive = true;
if (disableUploadTimeout) {
On 08/10/2009 11:17 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 08/10/2009 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Http11Processor.java
inputBuffer.parseRequestLine();
request.setStartTime(System.currentTimeMillis());
keptAlive = true;
if (disableUploadTimeout) {
On 08/13/2009 10:48 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Post discussion between Tomcat PMC and Jakarta PMC (with myself as the
go between), the Jakarta Taglibs subproject is going to move over to
Tomcat land. Chiefly this means:
* The JSTL implementations: 1.0, 1.1 and unreleased 1.2.
* RDC Taglib.
* An
On 09/16/2009 06:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 16.09.2009 17:24, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 16/09/09 16:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Sep 16 13:24:54 2009
New Revision: 815768
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815768view=rev
Log:
Sync java parts of
On 10/10/2009 12:24 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're gonna run into all the same issues we already worked through with
tribes. I'm not sure why you don't just use tribes rather than
reinventing everything from scratch
Well it is not exactly solving the same problem, here we need a
On 10/12/2009 03:27 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
On 10/12/2009 01:06 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 10/10/2009 12:24 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
you're gonna run into all the same issues we already worked through with
tribes. I'm not sure why you don't just use tribes rather
On 10/20/2009 05:57 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
j-f-c has through his social networking skills indicated he is working
on it :)
jean-frederic, are you?
Yep I have tagged, prepared tarball. So we will be able to vote on it soon.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
On 10/19/2009 10:42 AM,
Hi,
Native 1.1.17 is available for testing.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/
Some binaries will be available at:
On 07/20/2011 11:11 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 20.07.2011 17:28, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Jul 20 15:28:05 2011
New Revision: 1148815
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148815view=rev
Log:
Improve fix for PR50394 Requires native 1.1.21
Does it require it
On 07/21/2011 01:34 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/7/19jfcl...@apache.org:
Author: jfclere
Date: Tue Jul 19 08:06:46 2011
New Revision: 1148216
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1148216view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR49595
Modified:
On 07/21/2011 03:55 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Why is this change needed? Look around current line 139, which already
handles that case. All the options are set there and the code before
your change mimics the code in httpd. I tested it recently and thought
it's correct for all protocol settings.
Hi,
I plan to tag
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/native/tags/TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_21/
tomorrow.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 07/25/2011 11:21 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
nope, let's go for release.
BTW, what's the main changes ?
Just bug fixes. I will update the changelog now.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Servlet EG is starting to discuss changes to the Servlet API for
3.1. It would be useful if the option existed to implement some of these
changes in Tomcat trunk. The benefits of this are:
- we can see how feasible the API changes are to implement
-
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/source
(Will be visible after the server
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there is any date for 6.0.33 release ?
Any committer can roll a release. Last time I
On 07/27/2011 06:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 16:48, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/26/2011 07:30 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
1. Should tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk be RTC or CTR?
CTR
2. With tomcat/trunk becoming the basis for Tomcat 8, I would like to
see earlier and more frequent alpha/beta
On 07/27/2011 02:04 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 07/27/2011 11:20 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Win32/Win64 binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.21/binaries/
Think we should stop shipping anything that is not voted for.
You should have
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 and earlier versions it fixes some bugs.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http
On 07/28/2011 01:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:39, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/07/2011 10:04, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 07/28/2011 10:10 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 10:20, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.21 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21
On 07/28/2011 11:24 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 28.07.2011 21:23, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR
On 07/28/2011 09:23 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
So here's the vote.
It will be closed in about 72 hours
(or sooner if enough votes are encountered)
There is no configure available into jni/native this time ?
I mention that because buildconf require APR source directory whereas
I used to build it
On 07/29/2011 01:09 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Yep I will retagged and reroll the release tomorrow morning, my tests now
looks ok :D
I get the source from the tags and tried to build them on OS/X 10.7 Lion.
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 07/29/2011 11:41 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Does the JVM there supports the -d32 now?
Yes, Apple JVM support both 32 and 64bits (-d32 / -d64) :
xmac:~ henri$ java -d64 -version
java version 1.6.0_26
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03-384-10M3425)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.22/source
Win32/Win64 binaries
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging script.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from
On 08/05/2011 04:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 04/08/2011 23:32, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 08/04/2011 10:13 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 29/07/2011 11:06, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.22 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.21 it just fix typos in docs and the packaging
On 08/01/2011 03:06 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/8/1 Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de:
- Binaries build against old APR 1.3.12 (recent ist 1.4.5)
and OpenSSL 0.9.8r (recent ist 1.0.1d).
Is that intentional?
(I think you meant 1.0.0d. That is what the latest version is [1]. )
1.
On 07/31/2011 11:09 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
It is unclear to me, what the current state is. It looks like we support
the unsafe legacy reneg whenever the OpenSSL used during build time
supports it. There is no configuration option to switch it off during
runtime. Right?
Yep it needs a patch in
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.22 stable.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Thank you,
--
The
On 08/12/2011 03:23 PM, Petr Sumbera wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere-3 wrote:
On 07/27/2011 07:07 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/07/2011 17:31, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi guys,
We're stuck with Tomcat 6.0.32 with this bug
(https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189).
Did there is any
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.33/
According to the release process, the 6.0.33 build corresponding to the
tag TOMCAT_6_0_33 is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.33 stable.
Apache Tomcat 6.0.33 is primarily a security and bug fix release. All
users of older versions of the Tomcat 6.0 family should upgrade to 6.0.33.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 09/08/2011 11:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2011/9/9 Christopher Schultzch...@christopherschultz.net:
On 9/8/2011 11:47 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/09/2011 16:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All, https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51698
Mark's official report to the
On 10/01/2011 03:03 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 7.0.22
It seems the maven repo doesn't have it yet, is that normal?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
Hi,
Do we want to organize a Tomcat meetup during the ApacheCon?
See http://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ApacheMeetupsNa11 for space and
already used slots.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi,
that looks good, arrange the formatting and create a bugzilla so it is
not forgotten.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 10/11/2011 04:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Now that JavaOne is over and people are back to their homes, maybe it
is time to roll 6.0.34?
I plan to do that next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe,
On 10/13/2011 07:26 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Re-reading the security pages I have several notes
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
1) security-6.html and others have the following text:
Please send comments or corrections for these
On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing the Tomcat zips
to a maven repo in svn. Not the best idea to have them in svn, so we're trying
to get them
On 10/14/2011 09:17 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Oct 14, 2011, at 12:07 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 10/14/2011 02:01 AM, David Blevins wrote:
We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the OpenEJB maven
build for a while now. So far that has been done by publishing
On 10/21/2011 05:30 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
On 10/20/2011 4:32 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
I'm arriving at 12:47 local time on Tuesday and I've got nothing to do
until the next morning besides check-into the hotel.
If anyone is interested in getting together for some drinks or
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using :: will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address= (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address=0.0.0.0 : bind on all IPv4 addresses.
address=:: : bind all IPv6
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests.
Actual using :: will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make
sense to have the following:
address= (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4).
address=0.0.0.0 : bind on all IPv4
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
there is a required patch in STATUS.txt before I can actually move this,
right now its failing TCK tests
Filip
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
How about cutting a release candidate on Monday, Aug 18th and if all
is well, have a release towards end of next week?
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fix wrong default in doc.
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/config/http.xml?rev=689758r1=689757r2=689758view=diff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
-1: If won't work if the there is only one IPv6 address and I don't see
how that could be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Sat Aug 30 15:52:33 2008
New Revision: 690600
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690600view=rev
Log:
Fix JVM crash on Tomcat start when IPv6 is enabled
Well, I was too fast in my comment...
In case we don't find an IPv6 returning sa is probably
Mladen Turk wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to release a new version of native so that it works
on my setup ?
Sure. Jean-Frederic was RM for the last one.
I can do it if he doesn't have the time.
I am on it ;-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Regards
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tcnative/v1.1.15/
According to the release process, the 1.1.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.15 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.14.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 16:23 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
The draft is here:
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=315
I though you were on the Servlet EG or am I mistaken?
I was not aware of that file for whatever reason. I now remember the
language that was discussed, and I
Mladen Turk wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
There are few issues and questions, I'm not sure its as simple as it
looks
:-)
For new development - are you going to make changes in both branches ? I
assume there will be
features that can only be done in 1.3.
Right.
1.1.x will be in bug fixing
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I'd like for us to start using the changelog for trunk, we're losing a
lot of changes being documented, not everything gets ported to 6.0 etc
do you guys have any thoughts on this?
+1.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
I never understood the use of the manual changelog - as opposed to svn log
and good commit messages.
Could we just use that ?
that would be nice if we then could
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Let's get a feel for what we think we should do.
Based on
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46038
I believe (pick only one):
a. [ ] It doesn't belong here, take it elsewhere
b. [ ] Bring it here, we'll ship it with next major version of Tomcat
Mark Thomas wrote:
Quick question. How do I figure out which APR and openSSL versions were
used to built the binary downloads of the native connectors?
For APR it should what is in the jnirelease.sh: apr-1.2.8 for openssl
there are no clear recommendations.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Cheers,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build), and one API typo.
Since we are in the release mania any objections to that?
Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 11:23 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I plan to tag the TOMCAT_NATIVE_1_1_16 later today.
The current trunk has few fixes over released 1.1.15
Improved IPV6 checking, building against APR 1.3
(not mandatory, but allows to build),
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
now that we do have a module directory, I'd like to propose to take the
bayeux impl out of tomcat core, and put it into an individual module
reasons
1. It's built on top of Tomcat, but its not core tomcat
2. We can release it more frequently to fix bugs
3. If
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello to the Tomcat team,
JK 1.2.27 has been available for testing for two weeks as a svn
snapshot. Several bugs have been found and fixed. So I would like
to proceed with the release vote.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
please help promote the ApacheCon live video streaming by forwarding
the email below to your PMC user and dev mailing lists, ASAP!
Thank you
Lars Eilebrecht
-
Subject: ApacheCon live video streaming available; keynotes and
Mladen Turk wrote:
sebb wrote:
I happened to spot the following in ssl.c:
static int jbs_gets(BIO *b, char *out, int outl)
...
int l = (int)strlen(J2S(o));
if (l outl) {
strcpy(out, J2S(o));
ret = outl;
}
...
return ret;
It looks a bit odd to me - I would have expected it to return l
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
r718796 seems to work fine for me
in r718819 tomcat wont even startup
Well r719198 works on my machine F9 Sun JVM.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I think we need to roll back the mass checkins done lately, please don't
roll my checkins back, they are simple but
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain it)?
See
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
Mark Thomas wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
In the tc-(trunk and 6.0.x) there are reference to a defaultcontext
concept that doesn't exist (well web.xml sets the default values of
contexts).
Should I fix the docs (by putting back the 5.5.x explanations) or is
there another way to explain
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I am planning on tagging the Tomcat JDBC pool for a first release.
First alpha? B-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hi,
A new tutorial has been added to the ApacheCon Web site:
Everything Tomcat - Administering, Tuning, Troubleshooting and Develop.
That is a 2 day tutorial given by Mark Thomas who is one of the greatest
tomcat developers. Getting a tutorial during the ApacheCon is the
oportunity to get more
Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Henri Gomez henri.go...@gmail.com wrote:
If you look at my message, my favourite is *not* a JK3. I'm in favor of
jk
1.3. The difference for me is that 1.3 will be very close to 1.2 without
any
bug architectural changes like migrating
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hello,
I'm thinking about branching JK, so adding
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/branches/jk1.2.x
and initially populate the branch with the contents of the 1.2.28 tag.
The motivation is to stabilize 1.2 and restrict further changes on
Oliver Schoenwald wrote:
Dear developers,
I have developed an SSL-based SessionManagement for our university's
e-learning system because I was unsuccessful to find any ability of
Tomcat 5
to create and manage an SSLSession as in the JSSE-Specification.
Several weeks of googling after such a
Jeff Turner wrote:
Hi,
For the last few months, issues.apache.org/jira has been running out of
memory about once a week. We've finally got it running in a profiler, and
are seeing most of the memory (eg. 486 of 572Mb) used up by char[]
buffers in BodyContentImpl. Here is a sample GC Root -
Jeff Turner wrote:
Hi,
For the last few months, issues.apache.org/jira has been running out of
memory about once a week. We've finally got it running in a profiler, and
are seeing most of the memory (eg. 486 of 572Mb) used up by char[]
buffers in BodyContentImpl. Here is a sample GC Root -
Hi,
Where are the old TC version archived? - I am not able to find TC4.1.2
in archive.apache.org -
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the sources -
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Yoav
On 5/22/06, Jean-frederic Clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Where are the old TC version archived? - I am not able to find TC4.1.2
in archive.apache.org -
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Ortwin Glück wrote:
Hi,
I am talking about this page:
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/howto/apache.html
(second hit in Google when you search for mod_jk)
1. It says There is actually two version of Apache, 1.3 and 2.0.
That's outdated information:
http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is not a user problem, for the moment I don't want to use
mod_jk, I
only want to modify it and thus understand the mod_jk code before. So I
think
my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Jean-frederic Clere [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My problem is not a user problem, for the moment I don't want to use
Hi,
I have been reading rfc2109 it gives an examples of cooky like (as the
spec's states):
+++
Cookie: $Version=1; Part_Number=Rocket_Launcher_0001; $Path=/acme
+++
But TC sends:
+++
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/apache-tomcat-5.5.15$ telnet localhost 8080
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Hi,
I have been reading rfc2109 it gives an examples of cooky like (as
the spec's states):
+++
Cookie: $Version=1; Part_Number=Rocket_Launcher_0001; $Path=/acme
+++
not sure where that syntax comes from, from what I read it looks
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
The Tomcat 4 build structure is slightly different to TC5. The main
build.xml is in the container sub-folder.
What is the reason for this move? In tomcat 5.0 and tomact5.5 (even in
4.1.31 as i remember) build is created very smoothly when I run ant
from the
on my machine ab tells:
+++
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 3
66% 3
75% 3
80% 4
90% 7
95% 17
98% 40
99%176
100%919 (longest request)
+++
For NIO.
And:
+++
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time
Darryl Miles wrote:
If my research is correct this the commons-daemon package ?
jakarta-commons (See http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/daemon/)
I'm looking to find out if a patch to add network support to the
'jsvc' program would be a welcome enhancement. I would like to be
able to
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
I would like to start releasing mod_jk 1.2.16 this week.
Since our last release was done from CVS and there are several updates
to the tool chain (autoconf/automake/m4/libtool), there is some risk
of breaking the release (additionally to mod_jk code bugs).
For that
Rainer Jung wrote:
I think it's time to rename jakarta-tomcat-connectors to
tomcat-connectors. I'll try to handle the remaining jakarta-tomcat
artefacts inside the connectors module and concerning the download.
Does anyone know about external references we might break?
The web pages
Hi,
Try to prevent CR/LF conversion when you commit... Hard to find what was
changed in MemberImpl.java :-(
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: fhanik
Date: Thu Jun 29 01:33:29 2006
New Revision: 417959
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=417959view=rev
Log:
Added
Costin Manolache wrote:
What's the status with mod_proxy ?
I think Mladen idea is to make the same enhancements in mod_proxy (and I
will try to help him :-)
It seems this kind of change would break backward compatibility, and
if this
happens - maybe it's better to fix the protocol
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well there was some provision in mind in AJP 1.4 :
Context informations forwarding for Servlet engine to Web Server
With this kind of information requested by webserver, we could
determine the version of Servlet AJP implementation and as such use
32/64k buffers.
the jk
Henri Gomez wrote:
I don't know if we could called it a regression but the API spec is to
used a socklen_t not an int or unsigned int.
iSeries compiler is very strict on such 'cast' and probably some
others. gcc is a little more conciliant :)
BTW, I think next major version of mod_jk (1.3 /
Rainer Jung wrote:
It's called once a minute (at least if a request comes in) to be able to
clean up things not directly related to the actual request, like closing
idle connections.
Something to add to mod_proxy probably.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
I'm
Please tell: TC ignores the chunk-extension instead ignore this data.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Here is the promised patch for the ChunkedInputFilter, please review
and comment,
Filip
Mladen Turk wrote:
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
It's called once a minute (at least if a request comes in) to be
able to
clean up things not directly related to the actual request, like
closing
idle connections.
Something to add to mod_proxy probably.
If you finish
Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, I suppose it should be neither int nor unsigned int,
but rather size_t, at least that's the retval from sizeof, right?
Of course its used by getsockopt that OTOH requires socklen_t.
Since it's only use is putting it into getsockopt(), I would
101 - 200 of 728 matches
Mail list logo
