Re: svn commit: r1796186 - in /tomcat/trunk: java/javax/servlet/http/ java/org/apache/catalina/connector/ java/org/apache/coyote/ java/org/apache/coyote/http11/ java/org/apache/coyote/http11/filters/

2017-05-26 Thread Josh Soref
mark wrote: > - * Compare with superrclass that uses SocketWrapper > + * Compare with superclass that uses SocketWrapper Fwiw, I finally posted my spelling scripts at https://github.com/jsoref/spelling If you wanted to, you could have a script that did: ```sh mv

Re: [Bug 57129] Regression. Load WEB-INF/lib jarfiles in alphabetical order

2017-05-26 Thread Josh Soref
Hi Mark, re: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129 This change seems significant enough that it merits mention in: https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-8.html I've inherited a number of tomcat7 servers which host quite a few wars/exploded wars, and I'd love to move us forward to

Tomcat 6 EOL notice

2017-05-17 Thread Josh Soref
A client of my employers wanted to know how much life our chosen application hosting platform has left. I found Mark's email [1] which suggested tomcat 6 eol [2]. That page says: > The Apache Tomcat team announces that support for Apache Tomcat 6.0.x will > end on 31 December 2016. > Three

Re: HTTP response reason phrases

2017-01-29 Thread Josh Soref
Rainer Jung wrote: > the old spec states "The Reason-Phrase is intended to give a short textual > description of the Status-Code. > The ... Reason-Phrase is intended for the human user." "human user" should be a pretty big clue that a UA should not be using it to make any decisions. Any UA that

Re: HTTP response reason phrases

2017-01-24 Thread Josh Soref
Christopher Schultz wrote: > I'm wondering what the wider community thinks about this change and > whether or not we should consider reverting it for Tomcat 8.5.x. Mark Thomas wrote: > The root cause is non-specification compliant clients. I generally don't > view specification non-compliance in

Re: hello

2017-01-09 Thread Josh Soref
I can drop that, but please note that the spelling is listed as corrected in the MIT key server. I really wonder how tomcat managed to corrupt it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional

Re: hello

2017-01-09 Thread Josh Soref
‎https://github.com/jsoref/tomcat/commit/7c6bc40ac289ee7e7c9655c69a529f18afb5b92f - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Re: hello

2017-01-09 Thread Josh Soref
I can certainly squash. The reason I personally retain splits by misspelled word is that it's easier to ‎rebase / resolve conflicts when I can see what word was misspelled. Typically large projects prefer to have my changes split into a couple of patches/PRs instead of as a single commit. As

hello

2017-01-09 Thread Josh Soref
Hi, I have a series of spelling fixes for Apache Tomcat [1]. If someone could suggest a preferred way to receive them, I'm happy to split them up. Some changes are more interesting than others (the change to KEYS is interesting). [1] https://github.com/jsoref/tomcat/commits/spelling