[Bug 63080] Support rfc7239 Forwarded header

2022-07-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080 --- Comment #3 from HanLi --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1) > I would recommend adding a new configuration option which specifies which > strategy to use: legacy, rfc7239, or "both" where both

[Bug 63080] Support rfc7239 Forwarded header

2022-07-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63080 --- Comment #2 from HanLi --- Hi all, I have implemented RFC7239 as I understand it, but as this is my first time implementing RFC functionality, I may not have a good understanding of RFC and may not have taken some things into account. I

[Bug 66134] TomcatAdminRoles ignored when using installer configuration file

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66134 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 66134] TomcatAdminRoles ignored when using installer configuration file

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66134 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas

[Bug 66150] Cannot load mod_jk.so into server: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 --- Comment #2 from Eric Covener --- Similarly unixd_set_global_mutex_perms is a Apache 2.2 symbol, so mod_jk is not built for Apache 2.4. Unfortunately when a native symbol is missing, we don't get far enough to directly report an error

[Bug 66150] Cannot load mod_jk.so into server: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 Rainer Jung changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66150] Cannot load mod_jk.so into server: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 Rainer Jung changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|while starting Apache |Cannot load mod_jk.so

[Bug 66150] while starting Apache server Httpd.conf file not loading and getting error at loading modules

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung --- "wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32" means you are likely trying to load a 32 Bit compilation of mod_jk into a 64 compilatoin of Apache httpd. This does not work. Make sure you are using a consis

[Bug 66150] while starting Apache server Httpd.conf file not loading and getting error at loading modules

2022-06-29 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66150 Rainer Jung changed: What|Removed |Added Component|mod_auth|mod_jk Product|Apache httpd

[Bug 65565] Tomcat responds with HTTP status code 503 with response body upstream connect error or disconnect/reset before headers. reset reason: remote refused stream reset

2022-06-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65565 Chaitanya kanagala changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chaitu56...@gmail.com -- You

[Bug 64848] WsSession objects in OUTPUT_CLOSED state are implicitly held by waitingProcessors and GC cannot purge them from the JVM heap

2022-06-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848 --- Comment #16 from Christopher Schultz --- (In reply to Vishwanath Karra from comment #15) > We are seeing this issue with 8.5.72 - is there some other patch needed for > the 8.5 codeline ? The fix is confirmed for 9.0.40. Are you sur

[Bug 64848] WsSession objects in OUTPUT_CLOSED state are implicitly held by waitingProcessors and GC cannot purge them from the JVM heap

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848 --- Comment #15 from Vishwanath Karra --- We are seeing this issue with 8.5.72 - is there some other patch needed for the 8.5 codeline ? The fix is confirmed for 9.0.40. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 10 [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2022/06/26]

2022-06-26 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66142] Encounter "ejectedExecutionException: Queue capacity is full" when #busy thread is less than minSpareThreads

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66141] useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 66142] New: Encounter "ejectedExecutionException: Queue capacity is full" when #busy thread is less than minSpareThreads

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142 Bug ID: 66142 Summary: Encounter "ejectedExecutionException: Queue capacity is full" when #busy thread is less than minSpareThreads Product: Tomcat 8

[Bug 66141] useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 --- Comment #1 from Jano John Akim Franke --- Example output of test-encoding.sh showing file transfer with retry resulting in modified file contents: Contents UTF-8: ...TEST 1. try: TEST(timeout waiting for 3 bytes) 2. try

[Bug 66141] useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Jano John Akim Franke changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||RFC -- You are receiving

[Bug 66141] useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Jano John Akim Franke changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows NT |Linux Hardware|PC

[Bug 66141] New: useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length

2022-06-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66141 Bug ID: 66141 Summary: useBomIfPresent removes UTF-BOM without modifying HTTP Content-Length Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.26 Hardware: PC OS: Windows

[Bug 66134] New: TomcatAdminRoles ignored when using installer configuration file

2022-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66134 Bug ID: 66134 Summary: TomcatAdminRoles ignored when using installer configuration file Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.64 Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 66120] j_security_check returns 408 if j_security_check request lands on different tomcat server from original server

2022-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66120 --- Comment #2 from psakkanan --- Please remember that this issue would pop as random login failure ( on Kubernetes or similar cloud infra) mostly on prod/deployed env. It took weeks for us to deduce this issue from random login error

[Bug 66120] j_security_check returns 408 if j_security_check request lands on different tomcat server from original server

2022-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66120 --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas --- Do we want to support this? It would mean finding a way to serialize: - the expected session ID (part of the CSRF protection) - the saved request This looks to be doable although it would some effort

[Bug 66129] ServletContainerInitializer ignored by Tomee because of jar name and web-fragment "ordering"

2022-06-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 --- Comment #2 from Simon --- Sorry for that. For tracking if someone ends here looking for an answer I created a bug in Tomee : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 62611] Compress log files after rotation

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62611 --- Comment #11 from HanLi --- (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #10) Hi Christopher, > The quality of this patch/PR is low. Several unresolved comments have been > made on the PR already. > > There isn't any pro

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 10 [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2022/06/19]

2022-06-19 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66129] ServletContainerInitializer ignored by Tomee because of jar name and web-fragment "ordering"

2022-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 66129] New: ServletContainerInitializer ignored by Tomee because of jar name and web-fragment "ordering"

2022-06-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66129 Bug ID: 66129 Summary: ServletContainerInitializer ignored by Tomee because of jar name and web-fragment "ordering" Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.63 Ha

[Bug 62611] Compress log files after rotation

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62611 --- Comment #10 from Christopher Schultz --- The quality of this patch/PR is low. Several unresolved comments have been made on the PR already. There isn't any proper resource-management. The CompressFileUtils class appears to be added twice

[Bug 62611] Compress log files after rotation

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62611 --- Comment #9 from HanLi --- hi all, Can I continue with this task based on PR#223? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66125] JMProxy - enhance security restrictions

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125 --- Comment #4 from Tim Funk --- True - if that is the case - there is this: /manager/status?XML=true which is xml, not JSON. I'd wonder what additional metrics users were interested that are missing. (As well as if its worth

[Bug 66125] JMProxy - enhance security restrictions

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125 --- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas --- If we want to support provision of metrics to unprivileged or minimally privileged users then I think we should consider a mechanism that doesn't involve those users providing the JMX query that gets

[Bug 66125] JMProxy - enhance security restrictions

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125 --- Comment #2 from Tim Funk --- 100% agreed. I definitely need to add more to the docs to call this out. For example - in manager-howto.xml - one tweak was the say WARNING instead of NOTE. I was hoping to hit the use case of people using

[Bug 66125] JMProxy - enhance security restrictions

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125 --- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat --- This enhancement is risky since if there's a problem somehow it will be an immediate RCE CVE (once people start assuming they can safely expose JMX to the world). -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug 66125] New: JMProxy - enhance security restrictions

2022-06-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66125 Bug ID: 66125 Summary: JMProxy - enhance security restrictions Product: Tomcat 10 Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity

[Bug 66120] j_security_check returns 408 if j_security_check request lands on different tomcat server from original server

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66120 psakkanan changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|j_security_check returns|j_security_check returns

[Bug 66120] New: j_security_check returns 408 if j_security_check request lands on different tomcat server from the original server

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66120 Bug ID: 66120 Summary: j_security_check returns 408 if j_security_check request lands on different tomcat server from the original server Product: Tomcat 9

[Bug 62245] [Documentation] Mention contextXsltFile in DefaultServlet configuration example

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62245 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 60597] Add ability to set cipher suites for websocket client connections

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 56448] Implement a robust solution for client initiated SSL renegotiation with NIO

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56448 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug 56522] jasper-el 8 does not comply to EL Spec 3.0 regarding null value handling

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 62723] Clarify "channelSendOptions" value in cluster documentation

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62723 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 56026] RemoteEndpoint.Async#sendText(String, SendHandler) not thread safe

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56026 --- Comment #17 from Remy Maucherat --- (In reply to Lukas Lieb from comment #16) > So my question is more is there anything planed or an open enhancement > request to change this? As Mark said: "You'll have to take up your co

[Bug 56026] RemoteEndpoint.Async#sendText(String, SendHandler) not thread safe

2022-06-14 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56026 --- Comment #16 from lukas.l...@axonivy.com --- Hi all I've run currently in the same problem with Tomcat 9.0.63. In my case there are not really concurrent calls but sometimes multiple calls shortly after each other, which also can result

[Bug 65401] do no silently fail on javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException "No appropriate protocol (protocol is disabled or cipher suites are inappropriate)"

2022-06-13 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65401 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 10 [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2022/06/12]

2022-06-12 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66104] Check for the existence of the log directory before executing the cleanup task at startup

2022-06-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66104 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66104] Check for the existence of the log directory before executing the cleanup task at startup

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66104 --- Comment #1 from HanLi --- the pr: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/521 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e

[Bug 66104] New: Check for the existence of the log directory before executing the cleanup task at startup

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66104 Bug ID: 66104 Summary: Check for the existence of the log directory before executing the cleanup task at startup Product: Tomcat 10 Version: unspecified Hardware: PC

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 10 [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2022/06/05]

2022-06-05 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 66103] MemoryRealm documentation needs to be reference file watching support

2022-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66103 Remy Maucherat changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug 66103] New: MemoryRealm documentation needs to be reference file watching support

2022-06-03 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66103 Bug ID: 66103 Summary: MemoryRealm documentation needs to be reference file watching support Product: Tomcat 8 Version: 8.5.79 Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 66101] Initial integration of tomcat into OSS-Fuzz

2022-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66101 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66101] Initial integration of tomcat into OSS-Fuzz

2022-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66101 --- Comment #2 from PatriceS --- (In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1) > I'll set up a Google account for the Tomcat security team's address. Perfect, thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 66101] Initial integration of tomcat into OSS-Fuzz

2022-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66101 --- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas --- I'll set up a Google account for the Tomcat security team's address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66101] New: Initial integration of tomcat into OSS-Fuzz

2022-06-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66101 Bug ID: 66101 Summary: Initial integration of tomcat into OSS-Fuzz Product: Tomcat 10 Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity

Bug report for Tomcat Native [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Connectors [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat Modules [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 10 [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 9 [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Tomcat 8 [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

Bug report for Taglibs [2022/05/29]

2022-05-29 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Bug 65118] Spurious null pointer exception in Http2UpgradeHandler when reloading web page

2022-05-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65118 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEEDINFO

[Bug 66068] Asynchronous request processing changes IP behind RemoteIpValve

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66068 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 65951] ant package with custom tomcat.output fails in add-osgi

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 --- Comment #6 from Mark Thomas --- Fixed in: - 9.0.x for 9.0.64 onwards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail

[Bug 65951] ant package with custom tomcat.output fails in add-osgi

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65951 --- Comment #5 from Matt M --- The fix for 9.0.x is missing a fix to this file: res/bnd/tomcat-embed-el.jar.tmp.bnd The fix for 10.0.x has it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66089] Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 65975] CLIENT-CERT authentication does not request cert from client and always denies access (401)

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65975 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|NEEDINFO

[Bug 66056] Enable Tomcat to support variables with spaces when defining environment variables _RUNJAVA and _RUNJDB (Windows)

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66056 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66076] Final block of encrypted response payload not being sent occasionally over TLS

2022-05-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66076 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug 66089] Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key

2022-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #3 from jfclere --- https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/517 should fix the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66076] Final block of encrypted response payload not being sent occasionally over TLS

2022-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66076 --- Comment #16 from Phil Clay --- Good news! The test has been running with no failures continuously since my last comment. I'll keep letting it run today. But I'm pretty confident that the problem is fixed since the test would normally

[Bug 66089] Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key

2022-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #2 from jfclere --- I think the logic looks for something like: -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY- Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED DEK-Info: AES-256-CBC,E9F2FB791E9BAAEC7BEE71DA73CA35F3 4LBH2H34b4BW0C2v8VYkp8/MCWPmW7iJnuqvH103DxnFV

[Bug 66089] Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key

2022-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat --- This change was part of the PR, and I don't see any reason for it ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 66089] New: Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key

2022-05-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Bug ID: 66089 Summary: Tomcat 9.0.63 won't start when used with a SSL certificate containing a RSA Private Key Product: Tomcat 9 Version: 9.0.63 Hardware: All

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >