Re: [VOTE] Private branches in the official Tomcat git repository

[guo xiong li]

> Hi,
>
> This vote is to regulate the use of branches in the official Tomcat
> repository beyond branches that are approved by the community such as
8.5.x
> and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly
in
> the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull
> requests.
>
> Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ?
> [ ] Yes
>  [X] No

In my opinion, I think the branches in Tomcat repo should correspond to the
current major maintenance version. Because this can be easily managed.
Some middle jobs when solving bug and adding feature should be done in
private fork.
I consider that the branch in Tomcat repo should be created by *project
committer* after a vote and can't be created by anybody casually.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:21 PM Rémy Maucherat  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> This vote is to regulate the use of branches in the official Tomcat
> repository beyond branches that are approved by the community such as 8.5.x
> and 7.0.x. It is possible to do development in private branches directly in
> the official Tomcat repository, as an alternative to using forks and pull
> requests.
>
> Should private branches be allowed in the official Tomcat git repository ?
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] No
>
> Rémy
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 7.0.97

[guo xiong li]

The BZ-63833 describes a NullPointerException in branch 7.0.x.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63833

It is better to solve it before release. I submit a patch to solve it just
now. Hope it  can help.

On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 9:04 PM Konstantin Kolinko 
wrote:

> вс, 6 окт. 2019 г. в 13:01, Violeta Georgieva :
> >
> > The proposed Apache Tomcat 7.0.97 release is now available for voting.
> >
>
> Thus far I ran the unit tests on Windows 10 with Java 6, 7, 8 and 13
> for all connectors.
> All is good except the following:
>
> 1. TestWebdavServletOptions fails with OutOfMemoryError on 32-bit Java
> and NIO connector (Java 6, 7, 8).
>
> It is not a regression and I do not consider it a showstopper.
>
> Filed into Bugzilla:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63836
>
> 2.TestAbstractAjpProcessor hangs with Java 13 and NIO.
>
> It would be better to fix this, if possible.
> It is also possible to release with this issue, but add a note to an
> announcement. I think that there exist a workaround by explicitly
> setting a timeout in server.xml.
>
> Filed into Bugzilla:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837
>
>
> 3. An Illegal reflective access warning for WebappClassLoaderBase with
> Java 13.
>
> Just a warning. I filed it as an enhancement request:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63838
>
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>