Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/134
@ljader, why? This is a static change, not a dynamic one.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/134
> How I can get the "Date" header without reloading the page when the
DevTools are closed (by default)?
As far as I can see, you can't
> Doesn't the "Modifi
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/134
I agree with @rmaucher, I see little benefit here. This not static content,
but dynamic. We have browser info and the {{Date}} header. For those who want
to checksum the response, this change
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/119
Please have a look what @ChristopherSchultz has proposed on the ticket.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/119
I'd really like to go with listeners as proposed just like the Spring
Secutiry framework does. You will be able to do whatever your want with that
information
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/119
Oh hell, this will break the public API in a patch release. Especially for
custom components. They won't retrain backward compat. Isn't there a better way
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/eb195bebac8239b994fa921aeedb136a93e4ccaf#commitcomment-29778594
In java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContext.java:
In java/org/apache/catalina/core/ApplicationContext.java on line
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@rainerjung My question simply was that if `Expires: 0` denotes a value in
the past (expired already), why should I explicitly use a valid header in the
past which requires more code to create
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Here is the reference commit:
https://github.com/apache/httpd/commit/60087a708b051c3c987b80abdfdc3f2e046ebc4d
@rainerjung How is `APR_DATE_BAD` defined? Unparsable? Or before Unix
epoch
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
Thanks for the explanation. I hardly believe that Chrome does not implement
`Expires: 0`. At best, we inquire with the Chromium project
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
@pandareen, how do you know that Chrome does not understand it?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
I'd rather use `0` according to the spec. Moreover, it has less bytes to
transfer.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Github user michael-o commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/98#discussion_r195838254
--- Diff: java/org/apache/catalina/manager/host/HTMLHostManagerServlet.java
---
@@ -173,6 +177,36 @@ protected String add(HttpServletRequest request,String
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/115
The format is described here:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.1
Why not the stuff altogether and store the preformatted string in a static
final? We can also use the value
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/96
Alright, did not notice that. Mark has to tell wether he is willing to
change this in 9.0. The other version likely won't change
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/96
@kdombeck Correct.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/96
Why is `POST` not part of the writable commands?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
Github user michael-o commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/96
@markt-asf I'd second the 405 instead of 403.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
Github user michael-o commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/d46012cb159c3384303eeceffc54eb78e6a62671#commitcomment-21548024
In java/org/apache/el/Messages.properties:
In java/org/apache/el/Messages.properties on line 32:
Shall it really output
Am 2013-02-14 00:43, schrieb bugzi...@apache.org:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54559
Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Am 2013-02-12 20:32, schrieb Mark Thomas:
On 12/02/2013 19:27, Michael-O wrote:
Hi dev,
by Konstantin's request I am asking the devs to consider synchronizing
Tomcat 6 conf/web.xml mime mappings with Tomcat 7.
In my opinion it would be very benificial for the entire user base when
both mime
Hi dev,
by Konstantin's request I am asking the devs to consider synchronizing
Tomcat 6 conf/web.xml mime mappings with Tomcat 7.
In my opinion it would be very benificial for the entire user base when
both mime mappings sections would be in sync inspite the growth in size.
I recently had
22 matches
Mail list logo
