https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #11 from Gustavo Stachera ---
(In reply to Joshua Lipstone from comment #8)
> Can you please either undo this or change it so that the Jars are only
> scanned if they match the inclusion filter.
> As of 9.0.30, if you wanted to set
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #10 from quaff ---
(In reply to Joshua Lipstone from comment #8)
> Can you please either undo this or change it so that the Jars are only
> scanned if they match the inclusion filter.
> As of 9.0.30, if you wanted to set the logic s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Joshua Lipstone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Beginner
--
You are receiving t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #6 from Mark Tho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #5 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to Chuck Caldarale from comment #4)
> Could the standard jar scanner recognize the "*.jar" pattern and simply
> short-circuit all the directory scanning?
I can see benefit in that solution for users
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #4 from Chuck Caldarale ---
Could the standard jar scanner recognize the "*.jar" pattern and simply
short-circuit all the directory scanning?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
It is a balance. I'm on the fence as to whether this is worth adding or not. If
you think it adds value then I'm not going to object.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
--- Comment #2 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Why not just do
>
> System.setProperty("tomcat.util.scan.StandardJarScanFilter.jarsToSkip","*.
> jar") ?
IIRC then that still reads the directories and then filter
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
12 matches
Mail list logo