Author: markt
Date: Wed Sep 4 10:14:40 2024
New Revision: 1920454
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1920454&view=rev
Log:
Update get involved section for translations
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/ci.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/conference.
diagram 1 to use PlantUML
---
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.png | Bin 73297 -> 45967 bytes
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.uml | 105 +++
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.vpd | 1 -
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
diagram 1 to use PlantUML
---
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.png | Bin 73297 -> 45967 bytes
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.uml | 105 +++
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.vpd | 1 -
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
diagram 1 to use PlantUML
---
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.png | Bin 73297 -> 45967 bytes
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.uml | 105 +++
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.vpd | 1 -
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
d
1 to use PlantUML
---
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.png | Bin 73297 -> 45967 bytes
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.uml | 105 +++
webapps/docs/architecture/startup/1_overview.vpd | 1 -
3 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --
g_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_
status=REOPENED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&a
08:27:06 2024 +0100
Merge pull request #9 from carehart/patch-1
correct typos
xdocs/ajp/ajpv13ext.xml | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 3 16:48:44 2024
New Revision: 1918886
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1918886&view=rev
Log:
Remove 8.5.x links (but NOT the actual docs) from the website
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/ci.html
tomcat/site/trunk
Author: markt
Date: Wed Jul 3 16:39:47 2024
New Revision: 1918885
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1918885&view=rev
Log:
Remove Tomcat 8 download page
Removed:
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-80.cgi
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/download-80.xml
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugrep
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57872
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 8|Tomcat 9
Version|8.5.x-trunk
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 5079f614dd maxTrailerSize can no longer be -1 after
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 922782e60e maxTrailerSize can no longer be -1
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
remm pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 90dcf26ddb maxTrailerSize can no longer be -1 after
Author: remm
Date: Wed Jun 19 11:42:14 2024
New Revision: 1918433
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1918433&view=rev
Log:
Site update for 9.0.90
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/build.properties.default
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/doap_Tomcat.rdf
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/download-10.html
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66196
Zetailz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zetailzt...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving
Author: markt
Date: Tue May 21 08:23:45 2024
New Revision: 1917847
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1917847&view=rev
Log:
Remove links to Tomcat Native 1.2.x
Removed:
tomcat/site/trunk/native-1.2-xdocs/
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/ci.htm
On 03/05/2024 11:01, Michael Osipov wrote:
On 2024/05/03 08:59:17 Mark Thomas wrote:
There have been discussions about a new tomcat-shaded JAR that would
provide all the shaded dependencies we use both internally and with the
migration tool. My general concern with that is the volume of code
On 2024/05/03 08:59:17 Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 03/05/2024 08:17, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > currenly we have a minimalistic ASN.1 parser in the code tree w/o any
> > testing
>
> The ASN.1 parsing is covered by the test suite.
My ba
On 03/05/2024 08:17, Michael Osipov wrote:
Hi folks,
currenly we have a minimalistic ASN.1 parser in the code tree w/o any
testing
The ASN.1 parsing is covered by the test suite.
since it assumes that the passed byte array is properly encoded.
Correct. For the Tomcat use case it is
Hi folks,
currenly we have a minimalistic ASN.1 parser in the code tree w/o any
testing since it assumes that the passed byte array is properly encoded.
Now, I do have some X.509 related improvements which I'd like to bring
upstream from my OSS project which I think will benefit eve
Commons File Upload 1.x and make @since tags project specific
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/fileupload/FileItem.java | 2 +-
.../tomcat/util/http/fileupload/FileItemHeaders.java | 2 +-
.../util/http/fileupload/FileItemHeadersSupport.java | 2 +-
java/org/apache/tomcat/util
info. FileUpload was manually synchronized with 1.x.
---
MERGE.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/MERGE.txt b/MERGE.txt
index 8404019433..c3e81ab842 100644
--- a/MERGE.txt
+++ b/MERGE.txt
@@ -51,10 +51,11 @@ Note: Only classes required for Base64 encoding
manually synchronized
with 1.x.
907906b83a is described below
commit 907906b83ad60eb7fc561f9d73e7b87445c18fd5
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 4 13:06:19 2024 +0100
Update merge info. FileUpload was manually synchronized with 1.x.
---
MERGE.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions
manually synchronized
with 1.x.
3c22524516 is described below
commit 3c225245161c5481aeb5eda4d1d77fa434bab3ac
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Thu Apr 4 13:06:19 2024 +0100
Update merge info. FileUpload was manually synchronized with 1.x.
---
MERGE.txt | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 047d00304b Align with Commons File Upload 1.x
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 6e0385bb59 Align with Commons File Upload 1.x and
Author: schultz
Date: Tue Mar 19 14:00:54 2024
New Revision: 68007
Log:
Upload v8.5.100 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.100/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.100/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.100/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.100/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
Bug ID: 68743
Summary: NIIM #1 Computer Training Institute Gorakhpur
Product: Tomcat 8
Version: 8.5.x-trunk
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Author: markt
Date: Mon Feb 19 09:00:21 2024
New Revision: 1915868
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915868&view=rev
Log:
Prepare old news pages for 2024
Added:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldnews-2023.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs/oldnews-2023.xml
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/oldn
Author: schultz
Date: Wed Feb 14 23:00:14 2024
New Revision: 67352
Log:
Upload v8.5.99 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.99/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.99/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.99/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.99/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.99/
Author: markt
Date: Tue Feb 13 08:33:54 2024
New Revision: 1915761
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1915761&view=rev
Log:
Add Tomcat Native 1.3 to navigation menu
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/ci.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/conference.html
2024 +
Merge pull request #1 from apache/pr/fix-readme-header
Update README.md
README.md | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For
Author: schultz
Date: Fri Jan 5 16:16:59 2024
New Revision: 66436
Log:
Upload x8.5.98 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.98/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #31 from Valentin Tyanov ---
Hey, is there a scheduled date for the January release?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
T
Author: markt
Date: Thu Dec 28 11:15:41 2023
New Revision: 1914965
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1914965&view=rev
Log:
Add some more ® symbols to pages that don't have them for the first reference
in the text
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #30 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #28)
> (In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #27)
> > The issue is not whether or not anyone is still using OpenSSL 1.0.2 today,
> > but whether or no
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
; lots of 1.0.2 generated keys and certs still in use.
>
> +1
>
> The issue is not whether or not anyone is still using OpenSSL 1.0.2 today,
> but whether or not anyone still have keys and certs when when they /were/
> using it in the past.
That would also mean that they are years ol
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #27 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #23)
> While 1.0.2 has been EOL for a while it would not surprise me at all to find
> lots of 1.0.2 generated keys and certs still in use.
+1
The issue
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas ---
Yes, this should be fixed for the next release round which is currently
scheduled for January.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #25 from Garo ---
That was fast! Does this mean that it will be fixed in an upcoming release? By
the way, thank you for being so responsive and reproducing this so quickly. (In
reply to Mark Thomas from comment #24)
> Confirmed. It
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas ---
Confirmed. It is a regression. OpenSSL 1.0.2 doesn't specify the PRF so the
default should apply.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas ---
Tomcat ships OpenSSL binaries are part of the Tomcat Native distribution. I
need to go back a bit but we have 1.0.2 binaries.
For now, this looks like a regression so I'm happy handling it here.
While 1.0.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #22 from ggar ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #21)
> The algorithm is being read as the pseudo random function and failing.
>
> I need to see if I can find (or build) an OpenSSL 1.0.2 binary.
Mark, there are several link
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #21 from Mark Thomas ---
The algorithm is being read as the pseudo random function and failing.
I need to see if I can find (or build) an OpenSSL 1.0.2 binary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
[2478]
> milliseconds
>
> The thrown error seems to have been added with this fix and that's why I'm
> writing here. That's my first post so I'm sorry if I should be opening a new
> report instead (couldn't find anything specific in the guidelines).
Likel
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #18 from ggar ---
Is it expected for PEM cert/key created with OpenSSL 1.0.2zh (or any 1.0.2) to
stop working after this change? It seems to work fine with items generated
through OpenSSL 1.1.1. Here's an example of the command we u
Author: markt
Date: Tue Dec 12 15:28:09 2023
New Revision: 1914598
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1914598&view=rev
Log:
Force a re-build to pick up any missing changes
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/bugreport.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/ci.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/conferen
Author: schultz
Date: Thu Dec 7 18:10:33 2023
New Revision: 65918
Log:
Upload Tomcat v8.5.97 for voting.
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.97/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.97/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.97/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.97/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/
cat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-9.0-doc/annotationapi/module-search-index.js
Wed Nov 15 10:57:51 2023
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+moduleSearchIndex = [];updateSearchResults();
\ No newline at end of file
Added:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/tomcat-9.0-doc/annotationapi/script-dir/jquery-3.6.1.min.js
URL:
http://svn.ap
Author: schultz
Date: Fri Nov 10 15:24:01 2023
New Revision: 65203
Log:
Upload 8.5.96 for voting
Added:
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.96/
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.96/KEYS
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.96/README.html
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.96/RELEASE-NOTES
dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.5.96/b
|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas ---
For 9.0.x and 8.5.x I think it makes sense to use 1.x in preference to 2.x
since 1.x supports the APR/Native connector. 10.1.x onwards are fine preferring
2.x.
Fixed in:
- 9.0.x for 9.0.83 onwards
- 8.5.x for 8.5.96 onwards
--
You
over 1.x
1e54fc0a91 is described below
commit 1e54fc0a918a032dc2be9159ba080d9cd71a26ca
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Fri Nov 3 14:07:11 2023 +
Add comment on preference for 2.x over 1.x
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/jni/Library.java | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 28763a2ec1 Add comment on preference for 2.x over 1
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
michael-o closed pull request #675: BZ 67926: PEMFile prints unidentifiable
string representation of ASN.1 OIDs
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
michael-o commented on PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#issuecomment-1787001486
Merged.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
unidentifiable string
representation of ASN.1 OIDs
40a1d14fd4 is described below
commit 40a1d14fd4717505f756f08d5b76abaf55b7778c
Author: Michael Osipov
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 30 11:43:36 2023 +0100
BZ 67926: PEMFile prints unidentifiable string representation of ASN.1 OIDs
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/util
unidentifiable string
representation of ASN.1 OIDs
60b68d8f2a is described below
commit 60b68d8f2a84e10e275fa8d7b83d1a2da99e35c2
Author: Michael Osipov
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 30 11:43:36 2023 +0100
BZ 67926: PEMFile prints unidentifiable string representation of ASN.1 OIDs
---
java/org/apache/tomcat
unidentifiable string
representation of ASN.1 OIDs
96688ea1ff is described below
commit 96688ea1ff1b622653dd9cc1c7cbe1a04ad5d81b
Author: Michael Osipov
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 30 11:43:36 2023 +0100
BZ 67926: PEMFile prints unidentifiable string representation of ASN.1 OIDs
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/util
unidentifiable string
representation of ASN.1 OIDs
3151ed38a6 is described below
commit 3151ed38a65a77f0bb2ef9668bd19ceb5f31c48a
Author: Michael Osipov
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 30 11:43:36 2023 +0100
BZ 67926: PEMFile prints unidentifiable string representation of ASN.1 OIDs
---
java/org/apache/tomcat/util
rmaucher commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377379112
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
import org.apache.tomcat.util.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.file.ConfigF
aooohan commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377275894
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ private byte[] fromHex(String hexString) {
}
return bytes;
michael-o commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377274168
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ private byte[] fromHex(String hexString) {
}
return bytes;
aooohan commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377262792
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ private byte[] fromHex(String hexString) {
}
return bytes;
michael-o commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377209435
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ private byte[] fromHex(String hexString) {
}
return bytes;
michael-o commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1377209435
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -624,6 +626,16 @@ private byte[] fromHex(String hexString) {
}
return bytes;
Comment:
I think this only needs to return a hex string of `oidBytes` if it does not
follow format as the message in GSSException only show a tip 'Improperly
formatted ASN.1 DER encoding for Oid' which will not help.
```suggestion
return HexUtils.toHexStrin
Comment:
I think this only needd to return a hex string of `oidBytes` if it does not
follow format as the message in GSSException only show a tip 'Improperly
formatted ASN.1 DER encoding for Oid' which will not help.
```suggestion
return HexUtils.toHexStrin
Comment:
I think this only need to return a hex string of `oidBytes` if it does not
follow format as the message in GSSException only show a tip 'Improperly
formatted ASN.1 DER encoding for Oid' which not help.
```suggestion
return HexUtils.toHexStrin
michael-o commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1376474963
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
import org.apache.tomcat.util.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.file.Config
michael-o commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1376474963
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
import org.apache.tomcat.util.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.file.Config
ChristopherSchultz commented on code in PR #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675#discussion_r1376435849
##
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse/PEMFile.java:
##
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
import org.apache.tomcat.util.codec.binary.Base64;
import org.apache.tomcat.util.fi
michael-o opened a new pull request, #675:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/675
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mai
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
Bug ID: 67934
Summary: APR connectors will fail to load when tcnative-1 and
tcnative-2 are installed in parallel
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67934
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #5 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #4)
> +1 - we are already using that class in the SPNEGO authenticator
I'll try prepare a PR for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #4 from Mark Thomas ---
+1 - we are already using that class in the SPNEGO authenticator
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #3 from Michael Osipov ---
I think the easiest solution is to use org.ietf.jgss.Oid.Oid(byte[]) and the
invoke #toString()
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Han Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||Beginner
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #1)
> Whether the user is provided with the OID in string or byte form doesn't
> change the fact that the PEM file isn't going to be usable.
>
&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Bug ID: 67926
Summary: PEMFile prints unidentifiable string representation of
ASN.1 OIDs
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.82
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
See https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/674
That should support any cert the current code supports plus the OpenSSL
defaults.
It is possible there are other combinations that need to be supported. It
sho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #15 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #14)
> I have this working with the current test cases and a default OpenSSL
> self-signed key as per the original report.
>
> The code needs to be cleaned up rather
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas ---
I have this working with the current test cases and a default OpenSSL
self-signed key as per the original report.
The code needs to be cleaned up rather so I am currently expecting to commit
the fix early n
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #13 from Remy Maucherat ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #12)
> I think some refactoring will be required
> for the ASN.1 parser to make it more robust.
I managed to do OCSP using it (
https://github.com/apache/
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #12 from Mark Thomas ---
My current assessment is that it is possible to handle this. We are going to
need to do a little more by hand. I think some refactoring will be required for
the ASN.1 parser to make it more robust.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ---
Yes. The steps to reproduce this worked perfectly. Thanks.
Currently working through the ASN.1 and relevant RFCs to see what we have and
if I can get Java to work with it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #10 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #9)
> I'm working on this now. I don't think I am as far forward as you. It would
> be useful if I could see that code you have so far.
>
> My current thinking is th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ---
I'm working on this now. I don't think I am as far forward as you. It would be
useful if I could see that code you have so far.
My current thinking is that the PKCS8 branch in PEMFile is going to need to
par
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz ---
I have uncommitted work locally which can read the ASN.1 and perform the
decryption, which does not fail (i.e. no exception is thrown).
But when interpreting the decrypted data as an ASN.1 stream
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
Is that in your pem-utils project?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz ---
It looks like handling OID 1.2.840.113549.3.7 is something I was working on a
while back in my project on GitHub. When running this through my own code, I
get some debug output saying something about
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #5 from Mark Thomas ---
We may end up supporting a subset of the OpenSSL functionality (and documenting
that).
For me the target is not to support everything OpenSSL does (although it would
be great if we could) but to support the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #4 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #3)
> It seems that very few (no?) users are creating keys with pass-phrases this
> way as this isn't an issue that has been reported previously and we went
> through
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67675
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas ---
It seems that very few (no?) users are creating keys with pass-phrases this way
as this isn't an issue that has been reported previously and we went through a
phase of getting reports of unsupported formats w
1 - 100 of 1069 matches
Mail list logo
