Hi,
2015-07-16 12:57 GMT+03:00 Andrei Ivanov :
>
> Hi,
> Maybe you can take a look at bug 58143 with this occasion :-)
I'll check it.
Regards,
Violeta
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #26 from Violeta Georgieva ---
The feature is backported to 7.0.x for 7.0.64 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
Hi,
Maybe you can take a look at bug 58143 with this occasion :-)
On 15 July 2015 21:52:45 CEST, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>2015-07-15 20:06 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>>
>> On 15 July 2015 16:28:59 CEST, Violeta Georgieva
>wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >2013-09-27 2:16 GMT+03:00 :
>> >>
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>> >>
>> >> --- Commen
2015-07-15 20:06 GMT+03:00 Mark Thomas :
>
> On 15 July 2015 16:28:59 CEST, Violeta Georgieva
wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >2013-09-27 2:16 GMT+03:00 :
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
> >>
> >> --- Comment #25 from Nick Williams
> >---
> >> *** At the very least, it shou
On 15 July 2015 16:28:59 CEST, Violeta Georgieva wrote:
>Hi,
>
>2013-09-27 2:16 GMT+03:00 :
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>>
>> --- Comment #25 from Nick Williams
>---
>> *** At the very least, it should say "@since 8.0, 7.0.46."
>
>While I was looking at this fea
Hi,
2013-09-27 2:16 GMT+03:00 :
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>
> --- Comment #25 from Nick Williams ---
> *** At the very least, it should say "@since 8.0, 7.0.46."
While I was looking at this feature which was marked as available in
7.0.46, I did not find neither
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #26 from Jackie Rosen ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #25 from Nick Williams ---
*** At the very least, it should say "@since 8.0, 7.0.46."
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #24 from Nick Williams ---
Excellent. Thanks! Two things:
1) InstrumentableClassLoader, as committed, says "@since 8.0, 7.0.44." At the
time I submitted my most recent patch, 7.0.44 was "next." As you know, due to
several recen
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas ---
The patch has been applied with a few minor tweaks to fix the various warnings
Eclipse threw up. It will be included in 8.0.0-RC4 onwards. I anticipate the
next 8.0.0-RCx release around (maybe even befor
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #22 from Juergen Hoeller ---
The patch looks fine to me. Would be great to merge it into Tomcat proper as
soon as possible.
Fortunately, since we're reflectively discovering those methods, we don't need
to wait for Tomcat binar
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Nick Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30825|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Nick Williams from comment #19)
> (In reply to Jeremy Boynes from comment #18)
> > 1) CopyOnWriteArrayList would simplify managing added transformers and is
> > intended for this use-case.
>
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #19 from Nick Williams ---
(In reply to Jeremy Boynes from comment #18)
> 1) CopyOnWriteArrayList would simplify managing added transformers and is
> intended for this use-case.
How have I never heard of this class before? Cert
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #18 from Jeremy Boynes ---
1) CopyOnWriteArrayList would simplify managing added transformers and is
intended for this use-case.
2) I would not try to de-dupe the list at all. There's no contract around
equals() for transformer
On Aug 29, 2013, at 4:28 AM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>
> --- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
> (In reply to Nick Williams from comment #15)
>> Created attachment 30749 [details]
>> Proposed implementation of this feature
>
> 1. Why
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Nick Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30749|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Nick Williams from comment #15)
> Created attachment 30749 [details]
> Proposed implementation of this feature
1. Why loop over list rather than using contains() in addTransformer() ?
2. S
On Aug 28, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 28/08/2013 13:36, Nick Williams wrote:
>>
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>>>
>>> Nick Williams changed:
>>>
>>> What|Removed
On 28/08/2013 13:36, Nick Williams wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>>
>> Nick Williams changed:
>>
>> What|Removed |Added
>>
On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:21 PM, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
>
> Nick Williams changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
>
> Attachment #
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Nick Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30748|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Nick Williams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30678|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Boynes ---
Created attachment 30678
--> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30678&action=edit
Proposal for transformer registration API
(In reply to Nick Williams from comment #11)
> Okeydokey
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #12 from Nick Williams ---
I noticed WebappClassLoader's toString() method includes a lot of information
about the ClassLoader, such as the parent ClassLoader, context name, delegation
setting, and repository. Should I also chan
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #11 from Nick Williams ---
Okeydokey. addTransformer() and removeTransformer() is my preference and also
what's easiest on the Spring folks (it will require no code change on their
part to work), so that's the direction we'll go
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Nick Williams from comment #9)
> Mark, what do you think?
My primary concern has already been articulated in comment #1.
> If you don't have a preference, I'll probably go
> Rainer's rout
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #9 from Nick Williams ---
I've received some guidance from the folks over at SpringSource
(https://jira.springsource.org/browse/SPR-10788) and I'd like to get started on
a patch for this now. However, I've yet to hear from Mark
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
--- Comment #8 from Nick Williams ---
To address Jeremy's concerns/questions:
1) I don't see a security issue. JBoss, GlassFish, WebLogic, and WebSphere, for
example, all "automatically enable this for all applications." You say,
"Currentl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317
Jeremy Boynes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Make|Facilitate weaving by
32 matches
Mail list logo
