https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #15 from Remy Maucherat ---
I still don't understand if this is caused by maxConnections or not. Can the
unlimited setting be tried and/or the connection count be monitored ?
Usually unplugging a network cable is
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #13 from Réda Housni Alaoui ---
The dump comes from a tomcat 8.0.38 with crashed http connector.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #12 from Réda Housni Alaoui ---
The dump is too big to be attached.
Here is a link to download it:
http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=00903516386387493654
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Réda Housni Alaoui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #10 from Remy Maucherat ---
Simply set maxConnections to unlimited (-1) in your configuration and you're
done.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #9 from Réda Housni Alaoui ---
Thank you for the fix.
When can we expect the 8.0.34 release?
Would it be wise to use the current 8.0.34 snapshot in production?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #7 from Mark Thomas ---
The problem is with the current connection count tracking. There are code paths
where this isn't being decremented when a connection closes in error. I'm
currently looking for a reliable
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #6 from Réda Housni Alaoui ---
I don't know if you can see this in the tdump but we are using the JSR356
websocket implementation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
reda.housniala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #5 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Remy Maucherat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
reda.housniala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
reda.housniala...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
--- Comment #2 from sl...@aceslash.net ---
I know it's difficult to debug like this, unfortunately I had to rollback the
production to 8.0.27 for now to restore our websocket services.
I'll see what I can do to give you relevant logs/thread
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58970
Julien Béti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jul...@beti.name
--
18 matches
Mail list logo