https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|Tomcat 7|Tomcat 8
Target Milestone|---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #15 from Michael Orr ---
Again, can someone please review this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #14 from Michael Orr ---
Is there any feedback on the attached patch please? Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Michael Orr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michaelomich...@gmail.com
--
You are re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #13 from Michael Orr ---
I've added three new patches for the various versions. You can now pass an
SSL_ENGINE property in the user properties when calling
WebSocketContainer.connectToServer().
I've marked the other properties (
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Michael Orr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34639|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Michael Orr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34638|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Michael Orr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34637|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
--
You are receiving this m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #9 from Michael Orr ---
Ok, thanks for the feedback. I'll work on a patch to pass in an SSLEngine
instance and deprecate/remove the old constants.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas ---
I think an SSLEngine is required rather than a socket factory but apart from
that I think that is the way to go. The code already started down that route
with SSLContext but I think SSLEngine is the right way
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
--- Comment #7 from Michael Orr ---
Yes, SSLSocketFactory would enable you to set all of these in one fell swoop
(with the exception of the hostname verifier, which I think is applied after
the socket factory has produced the initial socket, bu
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60597
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add ability to set cipher |Add ability to set cipher
15 matches
Mail list logo